proceedings of the 2017 14th international joint conference on computer science and software engineering, jcsse 2017 | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3818 / 33,959
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 4 weeks ago

proceedings of the 2017 14th international joint conference on computer science and software engineering, jcsse 2017

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name proceedings of the 2017 14th international joint conference on computer science and software engineering, jcsse 2017
Abbreviated Name proceedings of the 2017 14th international joint conference on computer science and software engineering, jcsse 2017
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (10 total)

2016
a single legionella pneumophila genotype in the freshwater system in a ship experiencing three separate outbreaks of legionellosis in 6 years
;Catrine Ahlen;Marianne Aas;Jadwiga Krusnell;Ole-Jan Iversen
Vol. 27 , pp. 1-7
453 views DOI Abstract
2016
neuromodulatory effects and targets of the scfas and gasotransmitters produced by the human symbiotic microbiota
;Alexander V. Oleskin;Boris A. Shenderov
Vol. 27 , pp. 1-12
322 views DOI Abstract
2017
Development of a MySQL Sandbox for processing SQL statements: Case of DML and DDL statements
Atchariyachanvanich K.
, pp. 0-0
304 views DOI
2015
anaerobically cultivated human intestinal microbiota as first-line treatment for clostridium difficile infection
;Kjetil Garborg
Vol. 26 , pp. 1-2
240 views DOI
2011
morris pollard, 1916–2011
;
Vol. 22 , pp. 1-1
235 views DOI
2015
immune modulation by non-digestible and non-absorbable beta-1,3/1,6-glucan
;Jan Raa
Vol. 26 , pp. 1-4
214 views DOI
2015
host microbiota modulates development of social preference in mice
;Tim Arentsen;Henrike Raith;Yu Qian;Hans Forssberg;Rochellys Diaz Heijtz
Vol. 26 , pp. 1-8
181 views DOI Abstract
2015
we all need friends
;Jørgen Valeur
Vol. 26 , pp. 1-1
176 views DOI
2012
peptides’ role in autism with emphasis on exorphins
;Karl L. Reichelt;Dag Tveiten;Anne-Mari Knivsberg;Gunnar Brønstad
Vol. 23 , pp. 1-9
173 views DOI Abstract
2011
position paper
;
Vol. 22 , pp. 1-1
170 views DOI
39
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.