Indexed in Journament

journal of advanced oxidation technologies

EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
21.1 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #28,818 of 29,339 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
48 Articles
Scores higher than 1.7% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name journal of advanced oxidation technologies
Abbreviated Name journal of advanced oxidation technologies
URL https://www.degruyter.com/journal/key/jaots/html

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.3 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity 0.0 28.9
Innovation 24.0 31.2
Community Impact 2.1 13.4
Content Distribution 63.9 88.4
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (48)

2013
improved compliance and patient satisfaction with estradiol vaginal tablets in postmenopausal women previously treated with another local estrogen therapy
;Minkin MJ;Maamari R;Reiter S
Vol. 2013 , No. default , pp. 133-139
305 views Abstract
2018
Usage of computational linguistics in English teaching in the background of big data
Zhong, Y.
Vol. 21 , pp. 0-0
303 views DOI
2014
fear, guilt, and debt: an exploration of women’s experience and perception of cesarean birth in burkina faso, west africa
;Richard F;Zongo S;Ouattara F
Vol. 2014 , No. default , pp. 469-478
290 views Abstract
2018
The embody and phenomenon of English language ambiguity in computational linguistics
Xu, B.
Vol. 21 , pp. 0-0
289 views DOI Abstract
2018
The application of modern educational technology in primary school English teaching based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation theory
Liu, F.
Vol. 21 , pp. 0-0
283 views DOI
2018
self- versus physician-collected samples for the follow-up of human papillomavirus-positive women in sub-saharan africa
;Viviano M;Tran PL;Kenfack B;Catarino R;Akaaboune M;Temogne L;Tincho Foguem E;Vassilakos P;Petignat P
Vol. Volume 10 , pp. 187-194
281 views Abstract
2017
sexual autonomy and contraceptive use among women in nigeria: findings from the demographic and health survey data
;Viswan SP;Ravindran TKS;Kandala NB;Petzold MG;Fonn S
Vol. Volume 9 , pp. 581-590
281 views Abstract
2013
agreement between patient-reported and provider-reported choice of contraceptive method among family planning patients in new york city: implications for public health
;Ventura A;Garbers S;Meserve A;Chiasson MA
Vol. 2013 , No. default , pp. 533-540
281 views Abstract
2015
safety and tolerability of dienogest in endometriosis: pooled analysis from the european clinical study program
;Strowitzki T;Faustmann T;Gerlinger C;Schumacher U;Ahlers C;Seitz C
Vol. 2015 , No. default , pp. 393-401
279 views Abstract
2013
intrauterine contraception after cesarean section and during lactation: a systematic review
;Goldstuck ND;Steyn PS
Vol. 2013 , No. default , pp. 811-818
269 views Abstract
2018
side effect experiences of south korean women in their twenties and thirties after facial plastic surgery
;Kim YA;Cho Chung HI
Vol. Volume 10 , pp. 309-316
169 views Abstract
2018
self- versus physician-collected samples for the follow-up of human papillomavirus-positive women in sub-saharan africa
;Viviano M;Tran PL;Kenfack B;Catarino R;Akaaboune M;Temogne L;Tincho Foguem E;Vassilakos P;Petignat P
Vol. Volume 10 , pp. 187-194
281 views Abstract
2018
Optimization and operation mechanism of agriculture products electricity supplier logistics distribution based on supply chain strategic coordination
Li, J.
Vol. 21 , pp. 0-0
146 views DOI
2018
Intelligent system for image based behavior detection in optical sensor security network
Liu, Z.
Vol. 21 , pp. 0-0
157 views DOI
2018
Research on software development process optimization design based on Java EE
Yi, Y.
Vol. 21 , pp. 0-0
184 views DOI
2018
Practice of college English reading teaching based on e-learning network teaching platform
Dan, L.
Vol. 21 , pp. 0-0
126 views DOI
2018
Research and practice of computer assisted Japanese intensive reading teaching
Juanjuan, D.
Vol. 21 , pp. 0-0
79 views DOI
2018
The application of modern educational technology in primary school English teaching based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation theory
Liu, F.
Vol. 21 , pp. 0-0
283 views DOI
2018
Construction of ESP English teaching mode of applied technical university
Rui, S.
Vol. 21 , pp. 0-0
34 views DOI
2018
Scaffolding teaching model application in English ESP course in colleges and universities
Wei, H.
Vol. 21 , pp. 0-0
236 views DOI
Journament Score
21.1/100 · Poor
Ranked #28,818 of 29,339 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

21.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

0.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

24.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

2.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

63.9/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.