Indexed in Journament

avian diseases

ISSN 0005-2086· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
34.5 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #13,392 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
14 Articles
Scores higher than 54.3% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name avian dis
Abbreviated Name avian dis
ISSN 0005-2086

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.5
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 39.0
Community Impact 8.6
Content Distribution 85.9
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for avian diseases
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.4
Accessibility 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 25.8
Innovation 39.0 27.4
Community Impact 8.6 7.8
Content Distribution 85.9 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (14)

2019
Identification of Areas at Increased Risk of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Occurrence in Commercial Poultry in Poland.
Vol. 63 , No. sp1 , pp. 257-262
377 views DOI Abstract
2019
Characterization of Virulent Strains from Necrotic Enteritis-Affected Broiler Chicken Farms.
Vol. 63 , No. 3 , pp. 461-467
358 views DOI Abstract
2018
Phylogenomics and Infectious Potential of Avian Avulaviruses Species-Type 1 Isolated from Healthy Green-Winged Teal () from a Wetland Sanctuary of Indus River.
Vol. 62 , No. 4 , pp. 404-415
339 views DOI Abstract
The effects of ts-11 strain Mycoplasma gallisepticum vaccination in commercial layers on egg production and selected egg quality parameters.
Vol. 44 , No. 3 , pp. 618-23
327 views Abstract
Isolation and characterization of a 6/85-like Mycoplasma gallisepticum from commercial laying hens.
Vol. 47 , No. 2 , pp. 499-505
319 views Abstract
2012
A comparative study of live attenuated F strain-derived Mycoplasma gallisepticum vaccines.
Vol. 56 , No. 2 , pp. 396-401
304 views Abstract
2019
Health of Commercial Egg Laying Chickens in Different Housing Systems.
Vol. 63 , No. 3 , pp. 420-426
299 views DOI Abstract
2019
Experimental Infection and Transmission of Newcastle Disease Vaccine Virus in Four Wild Passerines.
Vol. 63 , No. 3 , pp. 389-399
292 views DOI Abstract
Complicated infectious coryza outbreaks in Argentina.
Vol. 38 , No. 3 , pp. 672-8
260 views Abstract
Effects of an S6 strain of Mycoplasma gallisepticum inoculation before beginning of lay on the leukocytic characteristics of commercial layers.
Vol. 48 , No. 1 , pp. 196-201
250 views Abstract
2020
imposing legality: hegemony and resistance under the eu forest law enforcement, governance, and trade (flegt) initiative
Vol. 27 , No. 1 , pp. 125-149
195 views DOI Abstract
2019
Health of Commercial Egg Laying Chickens in Different Housing Systems.
Vol. 63 , No. 3 , pp. 420-426
299 views DOI Abstract
2019
Characterization of Virulent Strains from Necrotic Enteritis-Affected Broiler Chicken Farms.
Vol. 63 , No. 3 , pp. 461-467
358 views DOI Abstract
2019
Identification of Areas at Increased Risk of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Occurrence in Commercial Poultry in Poland.
Vol. 63 , No. sp1 , pp. 257-262
377 views DOI Abstract
2019
Experimental Infection and Transmission of Newcastle Disease Vaccine Virus in Four Wild Passerines.
Vol. 63 , No. 3 , pp. 389-399
292 views DOI Abstract
2018
Phylogenomics and Infectious Potential of Avian Avulaviruses Species-Type 1 Isolated from Healthy Green-Winged Teal () from a Wetland Sanctuary of Indus River.
Vol. 62 , No. 4 , pp. 404-415
339 views DOI Abstract
2012
A comparative study of live attenuated F strain-derived Mycoplasma gallisepticum vaccines.
Vol. 56 , No. 2 , pp. 396-401
304 views Abstract
2005
Comparison of culture, PCR, and different serologic tests for detection of Mycoplasma gallisepticum and Mycoplasma synoviae infections.
Vol. 49 , No. 2 , pp. 260-8
245 views Abstract
Influence of F strain Mycoplasma gallisepticum infection on response of commercial layers to heat exposure.
Vol. 32 , No. 2 , pp. 232-4
209 views Abstract
Journament Score
34.5/100 · Poor
Ranked #13,392 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

34.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

39.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

8.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

85.9/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.