proceedings of 2019 international conference on innovative trends in computer engineering, itce 2019 | Journament

Journal Ranking

#6419 / 33,982
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

proceedings of 2019 international conference on innovative trends in computer engineering, itce 2019

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name proceedings of 2019 international conference on innovative trends in computer engineering, itce 2019
Abbreviated Name proceedings of 2019 international conference on innovative trends in computer engineering, itce 2019
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (15 total)

2011
development of a questionnaire to assess experience and preference of intranasal corticosteroids in patients with allergic rhinitis
;Crawford B;Stanford R;Wong AY;Dalal A;Bayliss M
Vol. 2011 , No. default , pp. 119-126
300 views Abstract
2016
validation of the oxford participation and activities questionnaire
;Morley D;Dummett S;Kelly L;Dawson J;Fitzpatrick R;Jenkinson C
Vol. 2016 , No. Issue 1 , pp. 73-80
294 views Abstract
2020
the role of attachment styles and communication skills in predicting nursing and medical students’ perception of elder abuse
;Salehi A;Gholamzadeh S;Javadi M
Vol. Volume 11 , pp. 11-19
288 views Abstract
2017
two-year follow-up study of a group-based diabetes medical nutrition therapy and motivational interviewing intervention among african american women
;Miller ST;Akohoue SA
Vol. Volume 8 , pp. 57-61
266 views Abstract
2019
MQL: Mixed Query Language for Querying MySQL and HBase Databases
Mershad K.
, pp. 124-129
265 views DOI
2015
the feasibility of using electronic clinical outcome assessments in people with schizophrenia and their informal caregivers
;Tolley C;Rofail D;Gater A;Lalonde JK
Vol. 2015 , No. default , pp. 91-101
251 views Abstract
2018
health-related quality of life in patients with iron deficiency anemia: impact of treatment with intravenous iron
;Strauss WE;Auerbach M
Vol. Volume 9 , pp. 285-298
235 views Abstract
2015
observational longitudinal study of symptom burden and time for recovery from community-acquired pneumonia reported by older adults surveyed nationwide using the cap burden of illness questionnaire
;Wyrwich KW;Yu H;Sato R;Powers JH
Vol. 2015 , No. default , pp. 215-223
232 views Abstract
2015
a systematic literature review to compare quality of life in psoriasis with other chronic diseases using eq-5d-derived utility values
;Møller AH;Erntoft S;Vinding GR;Jemec GB
Vol. 2015 , No. default , pp. 167-177
215 views Abstract
2011
angiotensin ii type 1 receptor antagonists in the treatment of hypertension in elderly patients: focus on patient outcomes
;Artavazd Tadevosyan;Eric J MacLaughlin;Vardan T Karamyan
Vol. 2011 , No. default , pp. 27-39
212 views Abstract
View All 15 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.