reviews on recent clinical trials | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1321 / 33,940
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

reviews on recent clinical trials

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name rev recent clin trials
Abbreviated Name rev recent clin trials
ISSN 1876-1038
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (46 total)

2019
Clinical Trial Data Management Software: A Review of the Technical Features.
Nourani, Aynaz;Ayatollahi, Haleh;Dodaran, Masoud Solaymani;
299 views DOI Abstract
2010
cytology of nasal mucosa, olfactometry and rhinomanometry in patients after co2 laser mucotomy in inferior turbinate hypertrophy.
;Jolanta Soroczyńska;Marlena Zukowska;Marek Rogowski;Irena Kasacka;Andrzej Sieskiewicz;Ewa Olszewska;Justyna Rutkowska
Vol. 48 , No. 2 , pp. 217-221
289 views DOI Abstract
2011
p21<sup>waf1</sup> and hypoxia/reoxygenation-induced premature senescence of h9c2 cardiomyocytes
;Ming-Yong Cao;Feng-Xiang Zhang;Bing Yang;Yu-Zhen Zhang;Dan Wang;Cheng Wang;Ming-Long Chen
Vol. 49 , No. 3 , pp. 445-451
266 views DOI Abstract
2012
testis morphology in rats chronically treated with letrozole, an aromatase inhibitor
;Lidia Wenda-Różewicka;Mariola Marchlewicz;Irena Baranowska-Bosiacka;Bartosz Zawiślak;Agnieszka Kolasa;Anna Kondarewicz;Barbara Wiszniewska
Vol. 49 , No. 4 , pp. 677-684
257 views DOI Abstract
2004
immunolocalization of estrogen receptor beta in the epididymis of mature and immature pigs.
;M Maggiolini;L Siciliano;B Bilinska;A Carpino;V Rago
Vol. 42 , No. 1 , pp. 13-17
250 views DOI Abstract
2011
characterization of human pituitary adenomas in cell cultures by light and electron microscopic morphology and immunolabeling
;Emil Pásztor;Katalin Bálint;Feliícia Slowik;Edit Kerekes;Ernő Bácsy;Balázs Hegedűs;Ilona Fazekas
Vol. 43 , No. 2 , pp. 81-90
248 views DOI Abstract
2009
age-related changes in the expression of 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 in rat leydig cells.
;Katerina Georgieva;Nina Atanassova;Mariana Bakalska;Yvetta Koeva;Michail Davidoff
Vol. 47 , No. 2 , pp. 281-287
243 views DOI Abstract
2012
evaluation of peritoneal tissue by means of differential scanning calorimetry (dsc)
;Łukasz Pietrzyk;Andrzej Chrościcki;Hanna Trębacz;Kamil Torres;Anna Torres
Vol. 49 , No. 4 , pp. 700-705
242 views DOI Abstract
2011
comparative analysis of biological profiles of benign prostate hyperplasia and prostate cancer as potential diagnostic, prognostic and predictive indicators
;Hanna Andrusewicz;Agnieszka Zyromska;Roman Makarewicz
Vol. 49 , No. 3 , pp. 452-457
233 views DOI Abstract
2010
new automated image analysis method for the assessment of ki-67 labeling index in meningiomas.
;Wielisław Papierz;Janina Słodkowska;Stanisław Osowski;Wojciech Kozłowski;Tomasz Markiewicz;Bartłomiej Grala
Vol. 47 , No. 4 , pp. 587-592
232 views DOI Abstract
View All 46 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.