Indexed in Journament

sistemasi: jurnal sistem informasi

ISSN 0000-0000· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
38.3/100
Journament Score
#11,499
Journament Rank
25
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name sistemasi: jurnal sistem informasi
Abbreviated Name sistemasi: jurnal sistem informasi
ISSN 0000-0000

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (25)

2016
autosomal dominant polycystic disease is associated with depressed levels of soluble tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand
Vol. 33 , No. 5 , pp. 512-516
514 views DOI Abstract
2016
school board policies on prevention and management of anaphylaxis in İstanbul: where do we stand?
Vol. 33 , No. 5 , pp. 539-542
446 views DOI Abstract
2016
langerhans cell histiocytosis with atypical intervertebral disc and sacroiliac joint involvement mimicking osteoarticular tuberculosis in an adult
Vol. 33 , No. 5 , pp. 573-577
354 views DOI Abstract
2016
does short message service increase adherence to smoking cessation clinic appointments and quitting smoking?
Vol. 33 , No. 5 , pp. 525-531
353 views DOI Abstract
2017
evaluation of the diagnostic role of bedside lung ultrasonography in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism in the emergency department
Vol. 34 , No. 4 , pp. 356-361
347 views DOI Abstract
2018
premature coronary artery disease due to homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia in a 12-year-old girl
Vol. 35 , No. 2 , pp. 208-211
287 views DOI Abstract
2018
are hiv, hbv and hcv voluntary counseling and testing programs needed in balkans?
Vol. 35 , No. 2 , pp. 229-220
281 views DOI Abstract
2017
the role of follow-up in monitoring the outcomes of prematurity in a cohort of romanian infants
Vol. 34 , No. 1 , pp. 21-27
279 views DOI Abstract
2011
dandy-walker variant in a fetus of an icsi twin gestation: a case report
Vol. 28 , No. 02 , pp. 219-221
251 views Abstract
2012
comparison of shr mode ipl system with alexandrite and nd: yag lasers for leg hair reduction
Vol. 29 , No. 4 , pp. 401-405
244 views Abstract
2018
are hiv, hbv and hcv voluntary counseling and testing programs needed in balkans?
Vol. 35 , No. 2 , pp. 229-220
281 views DOI Abstract
2018
premature coronary artery disease due to homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia in a 12-year-old girl
Vol. 35 , No. 2 , pp. 208-211
287 views DOI Abstract
2018
SISTEM INFORMASI EVALUASI SISWA SMP NEGERI SATU ATAP KUALA SEBATU
Vol. 2 , No. 3 , pp. -
171 views Abstract
2017
brucella melitensis as causative agent for neck abscess in an endemic area
Vol. 34 , No. 1 , pp. 78-80
183 views DOI Abstract
2017
primary sinonasal malignant melanoma: effect of clinical and histopathologic prognostic factors on survival
Vol. 34 , No. 3 , pp. 255-262
231 views DOI Abstract
2017
evaluation of the diagnostic role of bedside lung ultrasonography in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism in the emergency department
Vol. 34 , No. 4 , pp. 356-361
347 views DOI Abstract
2017
retrograde gastric intussusception
Vol. 34 , No. 2 , pp. 182-184
82 views DOI
2017
amoxycillin and metronidazole therapy for helicobacter pylori eradication: a 10-year trend in turin, italy
Vol. 34 , No. 3 , pp. 290-291
193 views DOI
2017
the role of follow-up in monitoring the outcomes of prematurity in a cohort of romanian infants
Vol. 34 , No. 1 , pp. 21-27
279 views DOI Abstract
2017
rare giant angiokeratoma of the vulva: a case report
Vol. 34 , No. 2 , pp. 163-164
177 views DOI Abstract
38
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

38.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.