jurnal tam | Journament

Journal Ranking

#815 / 33,938
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 6 days ago

jurnal tam

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name jurnal tam
Abbreviated Name jurnal tam
ISSN 0000-0000
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (171 total)

2016
clinical utility of her2 assessed by immunohistochemistry in patients undergoing curative resection for gastric cancer
;Liu X;Xu P;Qiu H;Liu J;Chen S;Xu D;Li W;Zhan Y;Li Y;Chen Y;Zhou Z;Sun X
Vol. 2016 , No. Issue 1 , pp. 949-958
379 views Abstract
2016
a new prognostic score based on the systemic inflammatory response in patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer
;Zhu L;Li X;Shen Y;Cao Y;Fang X;Chen J;Yuan Y
Vol. 2016 , No. Issue 1 , pp. 4879-4886
379 views Abstract
2017
long noncoding rna linc01296 is associated with poor prognosis in prostate cancer and promotes cancer-cell proliferation and metastasis
;Wu J;Cheng G;Zhang C;Zheng Y;Xu H;Yang H;Hua L
Vol. Volume 10 , pp. 1843-1852
365 views Abstract
2018
association of vdr gene taqi polymorphism with the susceptibility to prostate cancer in asian population evaluated by an updated systematic meta-analysis
;Chen L;Wei J;Zhang S;Lou Z;Wang X;Ren Y;Qi H;Xie Z;Chen Y;Chen F;Wu Q;Fan X;Xu H;Huang S;Weng G
Vol. Volume 11 , pp. 3267-3280
359 views Abstract
2015
sox2 expression is associated with fgfr fusion genes and predicts favorable outcome in lung squamous cell carcinomas
;Zheng S;Pan Y;Wang R;Li Y;Cheng C;Shen X;Li B;Zheng D;Sun Y;Chen H
Vol. 2015 , No. default , pp. 3009-3016
357 views Abstract
2017
fibronectin 1 promotes migration and invasion of papillary thyroid cancer and predicts papillary thyroid cancer lymph node metastasis
;Xia S;Wang C;Postma EL;Yang Y;Ni X;Zhan W
Vol. Volume 10 , pp. 1743-1755
356 views Abstract
2016
lead identification for the k-ras protein: virtual screening and combinatorial fragment-based approaches
;Pathan AAK;Panthi B;Khan Z;Koppula PR;Alanazi MS;Sachchidanand;Parine NR;Chourasia M
Vol. 2016 , No. Issue 1 , pp. 2575-2584
353 views Abstract
2016
feasibility, tolerability, and efficacy of the concurrent addition of erlotinib to thoracic radiotherapy in locally advanced unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase ii trial
;Martínez E;Martínez M;Rico M;Hernández B;Casas F;Viñolas N;Pérez-Casas A;Dómine M;Mínguez J
Vol. 2016 , No. Issue 1 , pp. 1057-1066
349 views Abstract
2016
docetaxel-loaded lipid microbubbles combined with ultrasound-triggered microbubble destruction for targeted tumor therapy in mhcc-h cells
;Zhang Y;Chang R;Li MQ;Zhao K;Zheng HZ;Zhou XD
Vol. 2016 , No. Issue 1 , pp. 4763-4771
343 views Abstract
2015
adipose tissue-secreted mir-27a promotes liver cancer by targeting foxo1 in obese individuals
;Sun B;Li J;Shao D;Pan Y;Chen Y;Li S;Yao X;Li H;Liu W;Zhang M;Zhang X;Chen L
Vol. 2015 , No. default , pp. 735-744
334 views Abstract
View All 171 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.