Indexed in Journament

Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES

ISSN 1306-696X· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
25.4 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #26,736 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
10 Articles
Scores higher than 8.7% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg
Abbreviated Name ulus travma acil cerrahi derg
ISSN 1306-696X

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 31.1
Timeliness 0.0
Diversity 5.6
Innovation 27.0
Community Impact 13.6
Content Distribution 69.9
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.1 30.4
Accessibility 20.4
Timeliness 0.0 5.8
Diversity 5.6 24.4
Innovation 27.0 25.7
Community Impact 13.6 5.8
Content Distribution 69.9 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (10)

2018
Antivenom use in bite and sting cases presenting to a public hospital.
Vol. 24 , No. 4 , pp. 343-350
422 views DOI Abstract
2020
Predictive and prognostic value of L-lactate, D-dimer, leukocyte, C-reactive protein and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio in patients with acute mesenteric ischemia.
Vol. 26 , No. 1 , pp. 86-94
400 views DOI Abstract
2020
Factors predicting reoperation after hand flexor tendon repair.
Vol. 26 , No. 1 , pp. 115-122
376 views DOI Abstract
2019
An anatomical examination of iatrogenic nerve injury during inside out meniscus repair with flexion and extension of the knee.
Vol. 25 , No. 6 , pp. 555-560
306 views DOI Abstract
2012
[Necrotizing fasciitis: diagnosis, treatment and review of the literature].
Vol. 18 , No. 6 , pp. 507-13
298 views DOI Abstract
2013
The functional results of acute nerve grafting in traumatic sciatic nerve injuries.
Vol. 19 , No. 2 , pp. 109-14
286 views DOI Abstract
2019
Fournier's gangrene: Review of 36 cases.
Vol. 25 , No. 5 , pp. 479-483
277 views DOI Abstract
2022
The assessment of risk factors associated with difficult intubation as endocrine, musculoskeletal diseases and intraoral cavity mass: A nested case control study.
Vol. 28 , No. 9 , pp. 1270-1276
139 views DOI Abstract
2009
[Pulsatile thoracal mass: a rare case of large left ventricular pseudoaneurysm].
Vol. 15 , No. 2 , pp. 198-200
117 views Abstract
2009
Peripheral vascular injury-related deaths.
Vol. 15 , pp. 357-61
107 views Abstract
2022
The assessment of risk factors associated with difficult intubation as endocrine, musculoskeletal diseases and intraoral cavity mass: A nested case control study.
Vol. 28 , No. 9 , pp. 1270-1276
139 views DOI Abstract
2020
Factors predicting reoperation after hand flexor tendon repair.
Vol. 26 , No. 1 , pp. 115-122
376 views DOI Abstract
2020
Predictive and prognostic value of L-lactate, D-dimer, leukocyte, C-reactive protein and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio in patients with acute mesenteric ischemia.
Vol. 26 , No. 1 , pp. 86-94
400 views DOI Abstract
2019
An anatomical examination of iatrogenic nerve injury during inside out meniscus repair with flexion and extension of the knee.
Vol. 25 , No. 6 , pp. 555-560
306 views DOI Abstract
2019
Fournier's gangrene: Review of 36 cases.
Vol. 25 , No. 5 , pp. 479-483
277 views DOI Abstract
2018
Antivenom use in bite and sting cases presenting to a public hospital.
Vol. 24 , No. 4 , pp. 343-350
422 views DOI Abstract
2013
The functional results of acute nerve grafting in traumatic sciatic nerve injuries.
Vol. 19 , No. 2 , pp. 109-14
286 views DOI Abstract
2012
[Necrotizing fasciitis: diagnosis, treatment and review of the literature].
Vol. 18 , No. 6 , pp. 507-13
298 views DOI Abstract
2009
Peripheral vascular injury-related deaths.
Vol. 15 , pp. 357-61
107 views Abstract
2009
[Pulsatile thoracal mass: a rare case of large left ventricular pseudoaneurysm].
Vol. 15 , No. 2 , pp. 198-200
117 views Abstract
Journament Score
25.4/100 · Poor
Ranked #26,736 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

25.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

27.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

13.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

69.9/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.