jurnal informatika upgris | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1138 / 33,930
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 days ago

jurnal informatika upgris

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name jurnal informatika upgris
Abbreviated Name jurnal informatika upgris
ISSN 0000-0000
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (18 total)

2015
Rancang Bangun Sistem Informasi Penghitungan Pajak Penghasilan (PPh) Pegawai UPGRIS Berbasis Web
Harjanta, aris tri Jaka;Dewanto, Febrian Murti;
Vol. 1 , No. 2 Desember , pp. -
280 views Abstract
2016
allelopathic tolerance of pea cultivars to sorghum halepense l. (pers.) extracts
;Georgieva Natalia;Nikolova Ivelina
Vol. 31 , No. 1-2 , pp. 59-67
240 views Abstract
2011
botrytis cinerea control and the problem of fungicide resistance
;Brankica Tanović;Goran Delibašić;Mila Grahovac;Milica Mihajlović;Jovana Hrustić;Petar Vukša
Vol. 26 , No. 2 , pp. 99-110
238 views Abstract
2006
effects of atrazine on soil microorganisms
;Ljiljana Radivojević;Ljiljana Šantrić;Radmila Stanković-Kalezić
Vol. 21 , No. 3 , pp. 215-221
235 views Abstract
2010
transmission of different nucleopolyhedroviruses by two ectoparasitoids – bracon hebetor say (hymenoptera: braconidae) and euplectrus plathypenae (howard) (hymenoptera: eulophidae)
;Emanouela E. Stoianova;Nikolay A. Balevski
Vol. 25 , No. 2 , pp. 133-137
214 views Abstract
2007
determination of copper-based fungicides by flame atomic absorption spectrometry using digestion procedure with sulfuric and nitric acid
;Jelena Milinović;Rada Đurović
Vol. 22 , No. 4 , pp. 317-321
208 views Abstract
2013
dispersion of the mediterranean fruit fly ceratitis capitata wiedem. (diptera: tephritidae) in mandarin orchards on montenegrin seacoast
;Sanja Radonjić
Vol. 28 , No. 1 , pp. 31-38
203 views DOI Abstract
2011
oil dispersion with abamectin as active ingredient
;Slavica Gašić;Dragica Brkić;Anđelka Tomašević
Vol. 26 , No. 4 , pp. 409-413
191 views Abstract
2014
possibility of environmentally-safe casing soil disinfection for control of cobwebdisease of button mushroom
;Ivana Potočnik;Emil Rekanović;Miloš Stepanović;Svetlana Milijašević-Marčić;Biljana Todorović;Ljiljana Nikolić-Bujanović;Milan Čekerevac
Vol. 29 , No. 4 , pp. 283-289
183 views DOI Abstract
2009
acute oral toxicity study of gal-57 (bentazon + dicamba) herbicide in rats
;Dragica Brkić;Slavica Gašić;Neško Nešković
Vol. 24 , No. 3 , pp. 221-225
173 views Abstract
View All 18 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.