Indexed in Journament

Bioinformatics

ISSN 1367-4811· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
38.8/100
Journament Score
#8,312
Journament Rank
456
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name Bioinformatics
Abbreviated Name bioinformatics
ISSN 1367-4811
URL http://bioinformatics.oxfordjournals.org

Indexings

scopus ncbi ulakbim sci

Publications Per Year

Articles (456)

2018
comparison between ropivacaine and bupivacaine in deep topical fornix nerve block anesthesia in patients undergoing cataract surgery by phacoemulsification
Vol. 66 , No. 9 , pp. 1268-1271
620 views DOI Abstract
2014
spectral domain optical coherence tomography morphology in optic disc pit associated maculopathy
Vol. 62 , No. 7 , pp. 777-781
553 views DOI Abstract
2014
optical coherence tomography findings and retinal changes after vitrectomy for optic disc pit maculopathy
Vol. 62 , No. 3 , pp. 287-290
524 views DOI Abstract
2014
comparison of clinical outcomes, patient, and surgeon satisfaction following topical versus peribulbar anesthesia for phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation: a randomized, controlled trial
Vol. 62 , No. 9 , pp. 927-930
519 views DOI Abstract
2013
Quantifying the complexity of medical research.
Vol. 29 , No. 22 , pp. 2918-24
519 views DOI Abstract
2013
Computational phosphorylation site prediction in plants using random forests and organism-specific instance weights.
Vol. 29 , No. 6 , pp. 686-94
513 views DOI Abstract
2020
OpenBioLink: A benchmarking framework for large-scale biomedical link prediction.
490 views DOI Abstract
2011
MixupMapper: correcting sample mix-ups in genome-wide datasets increases power to detect small genetic effects.
Vol. 27 , No. 15 , pp. 2104-11
490 views DOI Abstract
2004
macular ischaemia as a marker for nephropathy in diabetic retinopathy.
Vol. 52 , No. 3 , pp. 205-10
490 views Abstract
2013
long-term change in central corneal thickness from a glaucoma perspective
Vol. 61 , No. 10 , pp. 580-584
475 views DOI Abstract
2024
scCancer2: data-driven in-depth annotations of the tumor microenvironment at single-level resolution.
Vol. 40 , No. 2
126 views DOI Abstract
2024
ViTAL: Vision TrAnsformer based Low coverage SARS-CoV-2 lineage assignment.
Vol. 40 , No. 3
47 views DOI Abstract
2024
Optimizing representations for integrative structural modeling using Bayesian model selection.
Vol. 40 , No. 3
96 views DOI Abstract
2024
GPro: generative AI-empowered toolkit for promoter design.
Vol. 40 , No. 3
116 views DOI Abstract
2024
Uncertainty-aware single-cell annotation with a hierarchical reject option.
68 views DOI Abstract
2024
SpatialView: an interactive web application for visualization of multiple samples in spatial transcriptomics experiments.
80 views DOI Abstract
2024
Incorporating temporal information during feature engineering bolsters emulation of spatio-temporal emergence.
64 views DOI Abstract
2020
all india ophthalmological society members' survey: practice pattern of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injection
Vol. 68 , No. 6 , pp. 1095-1098
368 views DOI Abstract
2020
DELPHI: accurate deep ensemble model for protein interaction sites prediction.
285 views DOI Abstract
39
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

38.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.