Indexed in Journament

industrial health

ISSN 1880-8026· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
36.1 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #6,117 of 29,297 scored journals (34,015 indexed)
10 Articles
Scores higher than 79.1% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name ind health
Abbreviated Name ind health
ISSN 1880-8026
URL https://www.jniosh.johas.go.jp/en/indu_hel

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.9 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 23.1
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 66.7 26.3
Innovation 24.0 24.1
Community Impact 5.7 4.3
Content Distribution 89.7 89.2
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (10)

2019
SOS - Appreciation overboard! Illegitimacy and psychologists' job satisfaction.
Kottwitz, Maria U;Pfister, Isabel B;Elfering, Achim;Schummer, Steffen E;Igic, Ivana;Otto, Kathleen;
459 views DOI Abstract
2017
Healthcare use for communicable diseases among migrant workers in comparison with Thai workers.
Rakprasit, Jutarat;Nakamura, Keiko;Seino, Kaoruko;Morita, Ayako;
Vol. 55 , No. 1 , pp. 67-75
364 views DOI Abstract
2003
Clinical study of asbestos-related lung cancer.
Kishimoto, Takumi;Ohnishi, Kazuo;Saito, Yoshiaki;
Vol. 41 , No. 2 , pp. 94-100
350 views Abstract
2016
a mathematical modeling technique with network flows for social welfare maximization in deregulated electricity markets
;Ryo Hase;Norihiko Shinomiya
Vol. 3 , No. C , pp. 59-66
346 views DOI Abstract
2019
Intensified job demands and job performance: does SOC strategy use make a difference?
Mauno, Saija;Kubicek, Bettina;Feldt, Taru;Minkkinen, Jaana;
327 views DOI Abstract
2008
Organizational work factors among workers and supervisors in export processing zones which support global markets.
Del Prado-Lu, Jinky Leilanie;
Vol. 46 , No. 5 , pp. 435-42
317 views Abstract
2016
path dependence in operational research—how the modeling process can influence the results
;Raimo P. Hämäläinen;Tuomas J. Lahtinen
Vol. 3 , No. C , pp. 14-20
315 views DOI Abstract
2009
Body mass index as an indicator of metabolic disorders in annual health checkups among Japanese male workers.
Ohwaki, Kazuhiro;Yano, Eiji;
Vol. 47 , No. 6 , pp. 611-6
311 views Abstract
2019
metaheuristics for rich portfolio optimisation and risk management: current state and future trends
;Jana Doering;Renatas Kizys;Angel A. Juan;Àngels Fitó;Onur Polat
Vol. 6 , pp. -
297 views Abstract
2015
robust quadratic assignment problem with budgeted uncertain flows
;Mohammad Javad Feizollahi;Hadi Feyzollahi
Vol. 2 , No. C , pp. 114-123
271 views DOI Abstract
2019
metaheuristics for rich portfolio optimisation and risk management: current state and future trends
;Jana Doering;Renatas Kizys;Angel A. Juan;Àngels Fitó;Onur Polat
Vol. 6 , pp. -
297 views Abstract
2019
Intensified job demands and job performance: does SOC strategy use make a difference?
Mauno, Saija;Kubicek, Bettina;Feldt, Taru;Minkkinen, Jaana;
327 views DOI Abstract
2019
SOS - Appreciation overboard! Illegitimacy and psychologists' job satisfaction.
Kottwitz, Maria U;Pfister, Isabel B;Elfering, Achim;Schummer, Steffen E;Igic, Ivana;Otto, Kathleen;
459 views DOI Abstract
2017
Healthcare use for communicable diseases among migrant workers in comparison with Thai workers.
Rakprasit, Jutarat;Nakamura, Keiko;Seino, Kaoruko;Morita, Ayako;
Vol. 55 , No. 1 , pp. 67-75
364 views DOI Abstract
2016
path dependence in operational research—how the modeling process can influence the results
;Raimo P. Hämäläinen;Tuomas J. Lahtinen
Vol. 3 , No. C , pp. 14-20
315 views DOI Abstract
2016
a mathematical modeling technique with network flows for social welfare maximization in deregulated electricity markets
;Ryo Hase;Norihiko Shinomiya
Vol. 3 , No. C , pp. 59-66
346 views DOI Abstract
2015
robust quadratic assignment problem with budgeted uncertain flows
;Mohammad Javad Feizollahi;Hadi Feyzollahi
Vol. 2 , No. C , pp. 114-123
271 views DOI Abstract
2009
Body mass index as an indicator of metabolic disorders in annual health checkups among Japanese male workers.
Ohwaki, Kazuhiro;Yano, Eiji;
Vol. 47 , No. 6 , pp. 611-6
311 views Abstract
2008
Organizational work factors among workers and supervisors in export processing zones which support global markets.
Del Prado-Lu, Jinky Leilanie;
Vol. 46 , No. 5 , pp. 435-42
317 views Abstract
2003
Clinical study of asbestos-related lung cancer.
Kishimoto, Takumi;Ohnishi, Kazuo;Saito, Yoshiaki;
Vol. 41 , No. 2 , pp. 94-100
350 views Abstract
Journament Score
36.1/100 · Poor
Ranked #6,117 of 29,297 scored
(34,015 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

36.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

66.7/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

24.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

89.7/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.