Indexed in Journament

journal of korean academy of nursing

ISSN 2093-758X· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
19.3 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #29,082 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
67 Articles
Scores higher than 0.7% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name j korean acad nurs
Abbreviated Name j korean acad nurs
ISSN 2093-758X

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.7
Timeliness 0.0
Diversity 5.6
Innovation 39.0
Community Impact 4.3
Content Distribution 30.0
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for journal of korean academy of nursing
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.7 30.4
Accessibility 20.4
Timeliness 0.0 5.8
Diversity 5.6 24.4
Innovation 39.0 25.7
Community Impact 4.3 5.8
Content Distribution 30.0 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (67)

2019
[Validity and Reliability of the Clinical Teaching Behavior Inventory (CTBI) for Nurse Preceptors in Korea].
Vol. 49 , No. 5 , pp. 526-537
462 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Identification of Knowledge Structure of Pain Management Nursing Research Applying Text Network Analysis].
Vol. 49 , No. 5 , pp. 538-549
447 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Development of a Quantitative Model on Adolescent Cyberbullying Victims in Korea: A System Dynamics Approach].
Vol. 49 , No. 4 , pp. 398-410
374 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Development and Validation of the Communication Behavior Scale for Nurses Caring for People with Dementia].
Vol. 49 , No. 1 , pp. 1-13
370 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Factors Affecting Clinical Practicum Stress of Nursing Students: Using the Lazarus and Folkman's Stress-Coping Model].
Vol. 49 , No. 4 , pp. 437-448
336 views DOI Abstract
2018
[Effects of Communication Empowerment Program Based on Situated Learning Theory for Nursing Students].
Vol. 48 , No. 6 , pp. 708-719
327 views DOI Abstract
2013
keragaman genotip dan jarak genetik sapi madura berdasarkan restriction fragment length polymorphism-dna (rflp-dna)
Vol. 36 , No. 2 , pp. 66-74
325 views DOI Abstract
2012
produksi, kualitas, dan kecernaan in vitro tanaman rumput benggala (panicum maximum) pada lahan salin
Vol. 35 , No. 1 , pp. 30-37
320 views DOI Abstract
2012
aktivitas enzim carboxy methil cellulase dan produksi volatile fatty acid pada fermentasi selulosa oleh mikrobia rumen secara in vitro
Vol. 30 , No. 2 , pp. 60-68
302 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Validity and Reliability of the Clinical Teaching Behavior Inventory (CTBI) for Nurse Preceptors in Korea].
Vol. 49 , No. 5 , pp. 526-537
462 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Identification of Knowledge Structure of Pain Management Nursing Research Applying Text Network Analysis].
Vol. 49 , No. 5 , pp. 538-549
447 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Development of a Quantitative Model on Adolescent Cyberbullying Victims in Korea: A System Dynamics Approach].
Vol. 49 , No. 4 , pp. 398-410
374 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Factors Affecting Clinical Practicum Stress of Nursing Students: Using the Lazarus and Folkman's Stress-Coping Model].
Vol. 49 , No. 4 , pp. 437-448
336 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Development and Validation of the Communication Behavior Scale for Nurses Caring for People with Dementia].
Vol. 49 , No. 1 , pp. 1-13
370 views DOI Abstract
2018
[Effects of Communication Empowerment Program Based on Situated Learning Theory for Nursing Students].
Vol. 48 , No. 6 , pp. 708-719
327 views DOI Abstract
2017
the performance of milk production, total milk revenue and reproduction indicators on dairy smallholders in yogyakarta and east java, indonesia
Vol. 41 , No. 2 , pp. 212-218
271 views DOI Abstract
2017
farmer's knowledge and economic analysis of using of chloris gayana grass as buffalo feed in pastoral land
Vol. 41 , No. 2 , pp. 219-229
251 views DOI Abstract
2016
dinamika ovarium pada kuda hasil persilangan pejantan thoroughbred dengan induk lokal indonesia
Vol. 40 , No. 3 , pp. -
145 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
19.3/100 · Poor
Ranked #29,082 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

19.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

39.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

4.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

30.0/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.