Psychological medicine | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1358 / 33,943
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.5/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
38
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

Psychological medicine

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci soc
Short Name Psychol Med
Abbreviated Name psychol med
ISSN 1469-8978
Aim and Scope
URL http://journals.cambridge.org/psm
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (60 total)

2017
Problematic alcohol use and reduced hippocampal volume: a meta-analytic review
Wilson S;Bair JL;Thomas KM;Iacono WG;;
Vol. 47 , No. 13 , pp. -
463 views Abstract
2019
Risk and protective factors for offending among UK Armed Forces personnel after they leave service: a data linkage study.
MacManus, Deirdre;Dickson, Hannah;Short, Roxanna;Burdett, Howard;Kwan, Jamie;Jones, Margaret;Hull, Lisa;Wessely, Simon;Fear, Nicola T;
, pp. 1-8
396 views DOI Abstract
2019
Toward incorporating genetic risk scores into symptom networks of psychosis.
Isvoranu, Adela-Maria;Guloksuz, Sinan;Epskamp, Sacha;van Os, Jim;Borsboom, Denny;, ;
, pp. 1-8
368 views DOI Abstract
2020
A network analysis of post-traumatic stress and psychosis symptoms.
Hardy, Amy;O'Driscoll, Ciaran;Steel, Craig;van der Gaag, Mark;van den Berg, David;
, pp. 1-8
357 views DOI Abstract
2019
Optimizing the clinical utility of four proposed criteria for a persistent and impairing grief disorder by emphasizing core, rather than associated symptoms.
Cozza, Stephen J;Shear, M Katherine;Reynolds, Charles F;Fisher, Joscelyn E;Zhou, Jing;Maercker, Andreas;Simon, Naomi;Mauro, Christine;Skritskaya, Natalia;Zisook, Sidney;Lebowitz, Barry;Bloom, Colleen Gribbin;Fullerton, Carol S;Ursano, Robert J;
, pp. 1-8
350 views DOI Abstract
2019
Integrating mental health and disaster preparedness in intervention: A randomized controlled trial with earthquake and flood-affected communities in Haiti
James, L.
, pp. 0-0
339 views DOI
2014
The 5% difference: early sensory processing predicts sarcasm perception in schizophrenia and schizo-affective disorder.
Kantrowitz, J T;Hoptman, M J;Leitman, D I;Silipo, G;Javitt, D C;
Vol. 44 , No. 1 , pp. 25-36
335 views DOI Abstract
2019
Do neighborhood social processes moderate the etiology of youth conduct problems?
Burt, S Alexandra;Clark, D Angus;Pearson, Amber L;Klump, Kelly L;Neiderhiser, Jenae M;
, pp. 1-11
328 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effect of behavior therapy for Tourette's disorder on psychiatric symptoms and functioning in adults.
McGuire, Joseph F;Ricketts, Emily J;Scahill, Lawrence;Wilhelm, Sabine;Woods, Douglas W;Piacentini, John;Walkup, John T;Peterson, Alan L;
, pp. 1-11
319 views DOI Abstract
2019
Psychological interventions using virtual reality for pain associated with medical procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Georgescu, Raluca;Fodor, Liviu A;Dobrean, Anca;Cristea, Ioana A;
, pp. 1-13
308 views DOI Abstract
View All 60 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
38
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.