Indexed in Journament

journal of experimental psychology animal learning and cognition

ISSN 2329-8464· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
37.8 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #3,845 of 29,297 scored journals (34,015 indexed)
63 Articles
Scores higher than 86.8% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name j exp psychol anim learn cogn
Abbreviated Name j exp psychol anim learn cogn
ISSN 2329-8464
URL http://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/xan/index.aspx

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 23.1
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 72.2 26.3
Innovation 45.0 24.1
Community Impact 5.7 4.3
Content Distribution 76.9 89.2
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (63)

2019
The effect of tDCS on recognition depends on stimulus generalization: Neuro-stimulation can predictably enhance or reduce the face inversion effect.
Civile, Ciro;Cooke, Anna;Liu, Xin;McLaren, Rossy;Elchlepp, Heike;Lavric, Aureliu;Milton, Fraser;McLaren, I P L;
427 views DOI Abstract
2014
attitudes and aggressive actions. inter-ethnic tensions among german, turkish and resettler adolescents
;Joachim Bruess
, No. 13 , pp. 209-240
360 views Abstract
2017
a new spanish generation in germany. analysis of the motivations to leave under the veil of the crisis
;Antía Pérez-Caramés
, No. 43 , pp. 91-116
346 views DOI Abstract
2013
la evolución de la opinión pública andaluza ante la inmigración: indicios de estabilidad y cambio en época de crisis económica
;Sebastián Rinken;Saúl Saúl Velasco Dujo
, No. 28 , pp. 58-86
341 views Abstract
2014
the united nations convention on migrant workers’ rights. obstacles, opportunities and perspectives
;Paul de Guchteneire;Antoine Pécoud
, No. 24 , pp. 9-55
334 views Abstract
2014
recent evolution and characteristics of the foreign population in madrid
;Gloria Lora Tamayo D’ocón
, No. 13 , pp. 7-59
330 views Abstract
2015
inmigración en tiempos de crisis: dinámicas de movilidad emergentes y nuevos impactos sociales
;Ana López-Sala;Laura Oso
, No. 37 , pp. 9-27
322 views DOI Abstract
2016
contradicciones de la globalización: migraciones y convivencia interétnica tras el 11 de septiembre
;Luis V. Abad Márquez
, No. 11 , pp. 225-268
314 views Abstract
2019
Pigeon category learning: Revisiting the Shepard, Hovland, and Jenkins (1961) tasks.
Navarro, Victor M;Jani, Ridhi;Wasserman, Edward A;
Vol. 45 , No. 2 , pp. 174-184
308 views DOI Abstract
2012
towards a european immigration policy:hacia una política europea de inmigración
;Cristina J. Gortázar Rotaeche
, pp. -
301 views Abstract
2020
segmentación en el ingreso por trabajo según condición migratoria, género y ascendencia étnico-racial en uruguay
;Clara Márquez Scotti;Victoria Prieto Rosas;Ana Escoto Castillo
, No. 49 , pp. 85-118
226 views DOI Abstract
2019
The effect of tDCS on recognition depends on stimulus generalization: Neuro-stimulation can predictably enhance or reduce the face inversion effect.
Civile, Ciro;Cooke, Anna;Liu, Xin;McLaren, Rossy;Elchlepp, Heike;Lavric, Aureliu;Milton, Fraser;McLaren, I P L;
427 views DOI Abstract
2019
Pigeon category learning: Revisiting the Shepard, Hovland, and Jenkins (1961) tasks.
Navarro, Victor M;Jani, Ridhi;Wasserman, Edward A;
Vol. 45 , No. 2 , pp. 174-184
308 views DOI Abstract
2017
presentación
;Mercedes Fernández García
, No. 40 , pp. 1-2
89 views
2017
new maids and caretakers in paris?: the reactivation of transnational social fields of spanish emigration following the economic crisis
;Laura Oso
, No. 43 , pp. 39-63
249 views DOI Abstract
2017
berganza setién, i. (2016). ciudadanía migrante. rutas, costos y dinámicas de los flujos mixtos en tránsito por perú
;Daniel Izuzquiza, SJ
, No. 41 , pp. 178-181
186 views
2017
international migration and living conditions: exploring the colombian case
;María Teresa Victoria Paredes;Luis Miguel Tovar Cuevas;Johann Alexis Ospina Galindez;Diego Alejandro Tovar Ríos;Mercedes Andrade Bejarano
, No. 40 , pp. 153-181
253 views DOI Abstract
2017
mariama on the move. migration capital and second generations in spanish youth emigration
;Laia Narciso Pedro;Sílvia Carrasco Pons
, No. 43 , pp. 147-174
219 views DOI Abstract
2017
a new spanish generation in germany. analysis of the motivations to leave under the veil of the crisis
;Antía Pérez-Caramés
, No. 43 , pp. 91-116
346 views DOI Abstract
2016
the roles of actors in the host society in the integration of inmigrants associations: a social networks analysis approach
;José Manuel Gaete Fiscella;Luis Mena Martínez
, No. 39 , pp. 149-181
209 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
37.8/100 · Poor
Ranked #3,845 of 29,297 scored
(34,015 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

72.2/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

45.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

76.9/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.