Indexed in Journament

the british journal of educational psychology

ISSN 2044-8279· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
38.5/100
Journament Score
#9,463
Journament Rank
44
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name br j educ psychol
Abbreviated Name br j educ psychol
ISSN 2044-8279
URL http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)2044-8279

Indexings

ncbi

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (44)

2018
What makes a good teacher? The relative importance of mathematics teachers' cognitive ability, personality, knowledge, beliefs, and motivation for instructional quality.
Baier, Franziska;Decker, Anna-Theresia;Voss, Thamar;Kleickmann, Thilo;Klusmann, Uta;Kunter, Mareike;
538 views DOI Abstract
2017
Achievement goal profiles and developments in effort and achievement in upper elementary school.
Hornstra, Lisette;Majoor, Marieke;Peetsma, Thea;
Vol. 87 , No. 4 , pp. 606-629
406 views DOI Abstract
2019
Bullying by siblings and peers: Poly-setting victimization and the association with problem behaviours and depression.
Foody, Mairéad;Samara, Muthanna;O'Higgins Norman, James;
402 views DOI Abstract
2019
Examining the multidimensional role of self-efficacy for writing on student writing self-regulation and grades in elementary and high school.
Zumbrunn, Sharon;Broda, Michael;Varier, Divya;Conklin, Sarah;
390 views DOI Abstract
2016
Cultural invariance of goal orientation and self-efficacy in New Zealand: Relations with achievement.
Meissel, Kane;Rubie-Davies, Christine M;
Vol. 86 , No. 1 , pp. 92-111
387 views DOI Abstract
2019
Performance assessment to investigate the domain specificity of instructional skills among pre-service and in-service teachers of mathematics and economics.
Jeschke, Colin;Kuhn, Christiane;Lindmeier, Anke;Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, Olga;Saas, Hannes;Heinze, Aiso;
386 views DOI Abstract
2020
The mathematical flexibility of college students: The role of cognitive and affective factors.
Shaw, Stacy T;Pogossian, Anahit A;Ramirez, Gerardo;
374 views DOI Abstract
2019
Why have I failed? Why have I passed? A comparison of students' causal attributions in second language acquisition (A1-B2 levels).
Soriano-Ferrer, Manuel;Alonso-Blanco, Elena;
352 views DOI Abstract
2019
What role do comprehension-oriented learning strategies have in solving math calculation and word problems at the end of middle school?
Kikas, Eve;Mädamürk, Kaja;Palu, Anu;
350 views DOI Abstract
2018
Significant predictors of mathematical literacy for top-tiered countries/economies, Canada, and the United States on PISA 2012: Case for the sparse regression model.
Brow, Mark V;
315 views DOI Abstract
2020
The mathematical flexibility of college students: The role of cognitive and affective factors.
Shaw, Stacy T;Pogossian, Anahit A;Ramirez, Gerardo;
374 views DOI Abstract
2019
Why have I failed? Why have I passed? A comparison of students' causal attributions in second language acquisition (A1-B2 levels).
Soriano-Ferrer, Manuel;Alonso-Blanco, Elena;
352 views DOI Abstract
2019
What role do comprehension-oriented learning strategies have in solving math calculation and word problems at the end of middle school?
Kikas, Eve;Mädamürk, Kaja;Palu, Anu;
350 views DOI Abstract
2019
Bullying by siblings and peers: Poly-setting victimization and the association with problem behaviours and depression.
Foody, Mairéad;Samara, Muthanna;O'Higgins Norman, James;
402 views DOI Abstract
2019
Examining the multidimensional role of self-efficacy for writing on student writing self-regulation and grades in elementary and high school.
Zumbrunn, Sharon;Broda, Michael;Varier, Divya;Conklin, Sarah;
390 views DOI Abstract
2019
Performance assessment to investigate the domain specificity of instructional skills among pre-service and in-service teachers of mathematics and economics.
Jeschke, Colin;Kuhn, Christiane;Lindmeier, Anke;Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, Olga;Saas, Hannes;Heinze, Aiso;
386 views DOI Abstract
2018
penerapan spatial mask untuk pembentukan efek sepia pada citra digital dengan modifikasi nilai piksel
;faruk alfiyan
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. -
125 views Abstract
2018
inovasi layanan lapor kehilangan (e-report) dengan metode rapid application development
;Ahmad Chusyairi;Bintar Rudiawan;Eko Sasongko
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 52-64
20 views Abstract
2018
What makes a good teacher? The relative importance of mathematics teachers' cognitive ability, personality, knowledge, beliefs, and motivation for instructional quality.
Baier, Franziska;Decker, Anna-Theresia;Voss, Thamar;Kleickmann, Thilo;Klusmann, Uta;Kunter, Mareike;
538 views DOI Abstract
2018
Significant predictors of mathematical literacy for top-tiered countries/economies, Canada, and the United States on PISA 2012: Case for the sparse regression model.
Brow, Mark V;
315 views DOI Abstract
39
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
38
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.