Indexed in Journament

Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making

ISSN 1552-681X· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
31.3 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #20,482 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
63 Articles
Scores higher than 30.1% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Med Decis Making
Abbreviated Name med decis making
ISSN 1552-681X
URL http://journals.sagepub.com/home/mdm

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 20.0 19.2
Diversity 5.6 28.8
Innovation 70.0 31.2
Community Impact 7.9 13.4
Content Distribution 63.0 88.4
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (63)

2019
Additive Multicriteria Decision Analysis Models Are Not Misleading Aids for Life-Critical Shared Decision Making.
Dolan, James G;
Vol. 39 , No. 7 , pp. 721
538 views DOI
2019
Response to "Additive Multicriteria Decision Analysis Models Are Not Misleading Aids for Life-Critical Shared Decision Making" (by J. Dolan).
Kujawski, Edouard;Triantaphyllou, Evangelos;Yanase, Juri;
Vol. 39 , No. 7 , pp. 722
408 views DOI
2010
ventricular dyssynchrony patterns in left bundle branch block, with and without heart failure
;Hygriv B Rao;Raghu Krishnaswami;Sharada Kalavakolanu;Narasimhan Calambur
Vol. 10 , No. 3 , pp. 115-121
393 views Abstract
2008
risk of death and recurrent ventricular arrhythmias in survivors of cardiac arrest concurrent with acute myocardial infarction
;Ish Singla;Haitham Hreybe;Samir Saba
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 5-13
381 views Abstract
2013
Evidence synthesis for decision making 6: embedding evidence synthesis in probabilistic cost-effectiveness analysis.
Dias, Sofia;Sutton, Alex J;Welton, Nicky J;Ades, A E;
Vol. 33 , No. 5 , pp. 671-8
370 views DOI Abstract
2019
Use of Lotteries for the Promotion of Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision Service: A Discrete-Choice Experiment among Adult Men in Tanzania.
Ong, Jason J;Neke, Nyasule;Wambura, Mwita;Kuringe, Evodius;Grund, Jonathan M;Plotkin, Marya;d'Elbée, Marc;Torres-Rueda, Sergio;Mahler, Hally R;Weiss, Helen A;Terris-Prestholt, Fern;
Vol. 39 , No. 4 , pp. 474-485
361 views DOI Abstract
2020
The Role of Social Circle Perceptions in "False Consensus" about Population Statistics: Evidence from a National Flu Survey.
Bruine de Bruin, Wändi;Galesic, Mirta;Parker, Andrew M;Vardavas, Raffaele;
, pp. 272989X20904960
348 views DOI Abstract
2009
isthmus dependent atrial flutter cycle length correlates with right atrial cross-sectional area
;Kousik Krishnan;Akshay Gupta;Sean M. Halleran;Dave Chawla;Elizabeth F. Avery;Julia L. Bienias;Richard G. Trohman
Vol. 9 , No. 3 , pp. 167-173
338 views Abstract
2017
how much do we need to provoke? challenges and opportunities in refining the pharmacological tests to unmask brugada syndrome
;Syamkumar Divakara Menon
Vol. 17 , No. 4 , pp. 100-101
329 views DOI
2005
role of biatrial pacing in prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery
;Massoud Eslami;Hamid Mirkhani;Mehdi Sanatkar;Homeira Bayat;Roya Sattarzadeh;Mahmood Mirhoseini
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 5-11
325 views Abstract
2023
Method for Calculating the Simultaneous Maximum Acceptable Risk Threshold (SMART) from Discrete-Choice Experiment Benefit-Risk Studies.
Fairchild, Angelyn Otteson;Reed, Shelby D;Gonzalez, Juan Marcos;
Vol. 43 , No. 2 , pp. 227-238
116 views DOI Abstract
2020
Exploring the Impact of Quality of Life on Survival: A Case Study in Total Knee Replacement Surgery.
Tew, Michelle;Dalziel, Kim;Dowsey, Michelle;Choong, Peter F;Clarke, Philip;
, pp. 272989X20913266
294 views DOI Abstract
2020
The Role of Social Circle Perceptions in "False Consensus" about Population Statistics: Evidence from a National Flu Survey.
Bruine de Bruin, Wändi;Galesic, Mirta;Parker, Andrew M;Vardavas, Raffaele;
, pp. 272989X20904960
348 views DOI Abstract
2019
Use of Lotteries for the Promotion of Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision Service: A Discrete-Choice Experiment among Adult Men in Tanzania.
Ong, Jason J;Neke, Nyasule;Wambura, Mwita;Kuringe, Evodius;Grund, Jonathan M;Plotkin, Marya;d'Elbée, Marc;Torres-Rueda, Sergio;Mahler, Hally R;Weiss, Helen A;Terris-Prestholt, Fern;
Vol. 39 , No. 4 , pp. 474-485
361 views DOI Abstract
2019
Additive Multicriteria Decision Analysis Models Are Not Misleading Aids for Life-Critical Shared Decision Making.
Dolan, James G;
Vol. 39 , No. 7 , pp. 721
538 views DOI
2019
Response to "Additive Multicriteria Decision Analysis Models Are Not Misleading Aids for Life-Critical Shared Decision Making" (by J. Dolan).
Kujawski, Edouard;Triantaphyllou, Evangelos;Yanase, Juri;
Vol. 39 , No. 7 , pp. 722
408 views DOI
2018
retrospective review of 65 atrioesophageal fistulas post atrial fibrillation ablation
;Ameena Jehaludi, MD;E. Kevin Heist, MD;M. Russell Giveans, PhD;Rishi Anand, MD
Vol. 18 , No. 3 , pp. 100-107
198 views DOI Abstract
2018
programming an icd: it’s time to change the defaults
;A. Thachil
Vol. 18 , No. 2 , pp. 54-55
135 views
2018
editorial board
;
Vol. 18 , No. 3 , pp. IFC-
44 views DOI
2018
electrocardiographic patterns in biventricular pacing delivered by second-generation cardiac resynchronization devices
;Amirfarjam Fazelifar;Fatemeh Jorfi;Majid Haghjoo
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 13-19
257 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
31.3/100 · Poor
Ranked #20,482 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

31.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

63.0/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.