Indexed in Journament

Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making

ISSN 1552-681X· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
40.2/100
Journament Score
#7,934
Journament Rank
63
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name Med Decis Making
Abbreviated Name med decis making
ISSN 1552-681X
URL http://journals.sagepub.com/home/mdm

Indexings

ncbi

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (63)

2019
Response to "Additive Multicriteria Decision Analysis Models Are Not Misleading Aids for Life-Critical Shared Decision Making" (by J. Dolan).
Vol. 39 , No. 7 , pp. 722
398 views DOI
2010
ventricular dyssynchrony patterns in left bundle branch block, with and without heart failure
Vol. 10 , No. 3 , pp. 115-121
384 views Abstract
2008
2013
Evidence synthesis for decision making 6: embedding evidence synthesis in probabilistic cost-effectiveness analysis.
Vol. 33 , No. 5 , pp. 671-8
359 views DOI Abstract
2019
Use of Lotteries for the Promotion of Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision Service: A Discrete-Choice Experiment among Adult Men in Tanzania.
Vol. 39 , No. 4 , pp. 474-485
349 views DOI Abstract
2020
The Role of Social Circle Perceptions in "False Consensus" about Population Statistics: Evidence from a National Flu Survey.
, pp. 272989X20904960
334 views DOI Abstract
2009
isthmus dependent atrial flutter cycle length correlates with right atrial cross-sectional area
Vol. 9 , No. 3 , pp. 167-173
321 views Abstract
A real options approach to watchful waiting: theory and an illustration.
Vol. 27 , No. 2 , pp. 178-88
315 views Abstract
2023
Method for Calculating the Simultaneous Maximum Acceptable Risk Threshold (SMART) from Discrete-Choice Experiment Benefit-Risk Studies.
Vol. 43 , No. 2 , pp. 227-238
103 views DOI Abstract
2020
Exploring the Impact of Quality of Life on Survival: A Case Study in Total Knee Replacement Surgery.
, pp. 272989X20913266
285 views DOI Abstract
2020
The Role of Social Circle Perceptions in "False Consensus" about Population Statistics: Evidence from a National Flu Survey.
, pp. 272989X20904960
334 views DOI Abstract
2019
Use of Lotteries for the Promotion of Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision Service: A Discrete-Choice Experiment among Adult Men in Tanzania.
Vol. 39 , No. 4 , pp. 474-485
349 views DOI Abstract
2019
Response to "Additive Multicriteria Decision Analysis Models Are Not Misleading Aids for Life-Critical Shared Decision Making" (by J. Dolan).
Vol. 39 , No. 7 , pp. 722
398 views DOI
2018
retrospective review of 65 atrioesophageal fistulas post atrial fibrillation ablation
Vol. 18 , No. 3 , pp. 100-107
186 views DOI Abstract
2018
programming an icd: it’s time to change the defaults
Vol. 18 , No. 2 , pp. 54-55
123 views
2018
editorial board
Vol. 18 , No. 3 , pp. IFC-
35 views DOI
2018
electrocardiographic patterns in biventricular pacing delivered by second-generation cardiac resynchronization devices
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 13-19
249 views DOI Abstract
40
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

40.2/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.