journal of materials chemistry b | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3372 / 33,982
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 days ago

journal of materials chemistry b

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ulakbim
Short Name journal of materials chemistry b
Abbreviated Name journal of materials chemistry b
ISSN 2050-750X
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (8 total)

2015
Rational design and fabrication of a cancer-targeted chitosan nanocarrier to enhance selective cellular uptake and anticancer efficacy of selenocystine
Yu, B.
Vol. 3 , pp. 2497-2504
296 views DOI
2016
Biocompatible polymer-metal-organic framework composite patches for cutaneous administration of cosmetic molecules
Márquez, A.
Vol. 4 , pp. 7031-7040
262 views DOI
2015
Ordered assemblies of silver nanoparticles on carbon nitride sheets and their application in the non-enzymatic sensing of hydrogen peroxide and glucose
Kundu, M.
Vol. 3 , pp. 1289-1300
256 views DOI
2014
Ti<sup>4+</sup>-immobilized multilayer polysaccharide coated magnetic nanoparticles for highly selective enrichment of phosphopeptides
Xiong, Z.
Vol. 2 , pp. 4473-4480
254 views DOI
2019
The long-term behaviors and differences in bone reconstruction of three polymer-based scaffolds with different degradability.
Yubao Li,Xue Xia,Qin Zou,JingQi Ma,Shue Jin,Jidong Li,Yi Zuo,Yubao Li;Yubao Li;Xue Xia;Qin Zou;JingQi Ma;Shue Jin;Jidong Li;Yi Zuo;Yubao Li;
Vol. 7 , No. 48 , pp. 7690-7703
250 views DOI
2016
Peptide nanofiber–CaCO3 composite microparticles as adjuvant-free oral vaccine delivery vehicles
Joshua D. Snook;Joshua D. Snook;Charles B. Chesson;Charles B. Chesson;Alex G. Peniche;Alex G. Peniche;Sara M. Dann;Sara M. Dann;Adriana Paulucci;Adriana Paulucci;Iryna V. Pinchuk;Iryna V. Pinchuk;Jai S. Rudra;Jai S. Rudra;
Vol. 4 , No. 9 , pp. 1640-1649
229 views DOI Abstract
2019
The long-term behaviors and differences in bone reconstruction of three polymer-based scaffolds with different degradability
Jinhui Huang;Jinhui Huang;Xue Xia;Xue Xia;Qin Zou;Qin Zou;Jingqi Ma;Jingqi Ma;Shue Jin;Shue Jin;Jidong Li;Jidong Li;Yi Zuo;Yi Zuo;Yubao Li;Yubao Li;
Vol. 7 , No. 48 , pp. 7690-7703
226 views DOI Abstract
2014
Magnetically guided survivin-siRNA delivery and simultaneous dual-modal imaging visualization based on Fe<inf>3</inf>O<inf>4</inf>@mTiO<inf>2</inf> nanospheres for breast cancer
Wu, J.
Vol. 2 , pp. 7756-7764
217 views DOI
42
Overall
Below Average
30
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.7/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.