Indexed in Journament

Neural regeneration research

ISSN 1673-5374· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
46.4 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #266 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
24 Articles
Scores higher than 99% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Neural Regen Res
Abbreviated Name neural regeneration research
ISSN 1673-5374

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.7
Timeliness 0.0
Diversity 81.8
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 10.0
Content Distribution 74.8
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.7 30.4
Accessibility — 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 81.8 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 10.0 7.8
Content Distribution 74.8 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (24)

2020
Evidence and explanation for the involvement of the nucleus accumbens in pain processing.
Harris, Haley N;Peng, Yuan B;
Vol. 15 , No. 4 , pp. 597-605
457 views DOI Abstract
2020
Modified constraint-induced movement therapy alters synaptic plasticity of rat contralateral hippocampus following middle cerebral artery occlusion.
Gao, Bei-Yao;Xu, Dong-Sheng;Liu, Pei-Le;Li, Ce;Du, Liang;Hua, Yan;Hu, Jian;Hou, Jia-Yun;Bai, Yu-Long;
Vol. 15 , No. 6 , pp. 1045-1057
444 views DOI Abstract
2020
Axon regeneration induced by environmental enrichment- epigenetic mechanisms.
Tang, Bor Luen;
Vol. 15 , No. 1 , pp. 10-15
439 views DOI Abstract
2020
Glial cells in intracerebral transplantation for Parkinson's disease.
Tomov, Nikola;
Vol. 15 , No. 7 , pp. 1173-1178
421 views DOI Abstract
2020
Effect of stromal cell-derived factor-1/CXCR4 axis in neural stem cell transplantation for Parkinson's disease.
Xu, Jiao-Tian;Qian, Yuan;Wang, Wei;Chen, Xiao-Xiang;Li, Yang;Li, Yu;Yang, Zhi-Yong;Song, Xiao-Bin;Lu, Di;Deng, Xing-Li;
Vol. 15 , No. 1 , pp. 112-119
389 views DOI Abstract
2020
tRNA cleavage: a new insight.
Rashad, Sherif;Niizuma, Kuniyasu;Tominaga, Teiji;
Vol. 15 , No. 1 , pp. 47-52
356 views DOI Abstract
2019
Optogenetics-induced activation of glutamate receptors improves memory function in mice with Alzheimer's disease
Wang, K.
Vol. 14 , pp. 2147-2155
347 views DOI
2019
Differentiating between Alzheimer's disease, amnestic mild cognitive impairment, and normal aging via diffusion kurtosis imaging
Song, G.
Vol. 14 , pp. 2141-2146
336 views DOI
2015
Therapeutic effects of different durations of acupuncture on rats with middle cerebral artery occlusion
Zhang, Chao;Wen, Yan;Fan, Xiao-nong;Tian, Guang;Zhou, Xue-yi;Deng, Shi-zhe;Meng, Zhi-hong;
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 159-164
331 views Abstract
2019
Turning to myelin turnover
Buscham, T.
Vol. 14 , pp. 2063-2066
325 views DOI
2021
Low-dose lipopolysaccharide as an immune regulator for homeostasis maintenance in the central nervous system through transformation to neuroprotective microglia
Mizobuchi;Haruka Mizobuchi;Gen-Ichiro Soma;
Vol. 16 , No. 10 , pp. 1928-
163 views DOI Abstract
2021
Evaluation of the combined activity of benzimidazole arylhydrazones as new anti-Parkinsonian agents: monoamine oxidase-B inhibition, neuroprotection and oxidative stress modulation.
Anastassova, Neda;Aluani, Denitsa;Kostadinov, Anton;Rangelov, Miroslav;Todorova, Nadezhda;Hristova-Avakumova, Nadya;Argirova, Maria;Lumov, Nikolay;Kondeva-Burdina, Magdalena;Tzankova, Virginia;Yancheva, Denitsa;
Vol. 16 , No. 11 , pp. 2299-2309
324 views DOI Abstract
2021
Insights into stem cell therapy for diabetic retinopathy: A bibliometric and visual analysis
Li, X.J.
Vol. 16 , pp. 172-178
191 views DOI
2020
Fast-tracking regenerative medicine for traumatic brain injury
Bonsack, B.
Vol. 15 , pp. 1179-1190
218 views DOI
2020
Efficacy of cattle encephalon glycoside and ignotin in patients with acute cerebral infarction: A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study
Zhang, H.
Vol. 15 , pp. 1266-1273
202 views DOI
2020
Effects of miR-219/miR-338 on microglia and astrocyte behaviors and astrocyte-oligodendrocyte precursor cell interactions
Nguyen, L.
Vol. 15 , pp. 739-747
266 views DOI
2020
Exosome-mediated crosstalk between microglia and neural stem cells in the repair of brain injury
Hou, B.
Vol. 15 , pp. 1023-1024
224 views DOI
2020
Shifting equilibriums in Alzheimer's disease: The complex roles of microglia in neuroinflammation, neuronal survival and neurogenesis
Gray, S.
Vol. 15 , pp. 1208-1219
241 views DOI
2020
Evidence and explanation for the involvement of the nucleus accumbens in pain processing.
Harris, Haley N;Peng, Yuan B;
Vol. 15 , No. 4 , pp. 597-605
457 views DOI Abstract
2020
Applications of advanced signal processing and machine learning in the neonatal hypoxic-ischemic electroencephalogram
Abbasi, H.
Vol. 15 , pp. 222-231
242 views DOI
Journament Score
46.4/100 · Below Average
Ranked #266 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

46.4/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

81.8/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

74.8/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.