Indexed in Journament

clinical gastroenterology and hepatology

ISSN 1542-3565· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
41.8/100
Journament Score
#4,042
Journament Rank
8
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name clinical gastroenterology and hepatology
Abbreviated Name clinical gastroenterology and hepatology
ISSN 1542-3565

Indexings

scopus ulakbim sci

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (8)

2017
Faculty Opinions Recommended Article: Efficacy of vedolizumab induction and maintenance therapy in patients with ulcerative colitis, regardless of prior exposure to tumor necrosis factor antagonists.
Feagan BG, Rubin DT, Danese S, Vermeire S, Abhyankar B, Sankoh S, James A, Smyth M.;Feagan BG;Rubin DT;Danese S;Vermeire S;Abhyankar B;Sankoh S;James A;Smyth M;
Vol. 15 , No. 2 , pp. -
238 views Abstract
2019
Validation Study of Elastographies in Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease for Detecting Liver Fibrosis
Kawada, T.
Vol. 17 , pp. 2139-2140
237 views DOI
2019
Association Between Intake of Red and Processed Meat and Survival in Patients With Colorectal Cancer in a Pooled Analysis
Carr, P.
Vol. 17 , pp. 1561-1570.e3
231 views DOI
2013
Internet liability for gastroenterologists: Select issues from social networking to doctor rating sites
Belle, J.
Vol. 11 , pp. 883-886
230 views DOI
2019
Exam 1: Association Between Intake of Red and Processed Meat and Survival in Patients With Colorectal Cancer in a Pooled Analysis
not, found
Vol. 17 , pp. e96-e97
218 views DOI
2019
Benefits From and Barriers to Portable Detection of Gluten, Based on a Randomized Pilot Trial of Patients With Celiac Disease
Wolf, R.
Vol. 17 , pp. 2605-2607
214 views DOI
2019
Lack of Follow-up of Pediatric Patients With Celiac Disease
Blansky, B.
Vol. 17 , pp. 2603-2604
211 views DOI
2019
Is Screening for Pancreatic Cancer in High-Risk Individuals One Step Closer or a Fool's Errand?
Hart, P.
Vol. 17 , pp. 36-38
199 views DOI
2019
Benefits From and Barriers to Portable Detection of Gluten, Based on a Randomized Pilot Trial of Patients With Celiac Disease
Wolf, R.
Vol. 17 , pp. 2605-2607
214 views DOI
2019
Lack of Follow-up of Pediatric Patients With Celiac Disease
Blansky, B.
Vol. 17 , pp. 2603-2604
211 views DOI
2019
Is Screening for Pancreatic Cancer in High-Risk Individuals One Step Closer or a Fool's Errand?
Hart, P.
Vol. 17 , pp. 36-38
199 views DOI
2019
Exam 1: Association Between Intake of Red and Processed Meat and Survival in Patients With Colorectal Cancer in a Pooled Analysis
not, found
Vol. 17 , pp. e96-e97
218 views DOI
2019
Association Between Intake of Red and Processed Meat and Survival in Patients With Colorectal Cancer in a Pooled Analysis
Carr, P.
Vol. 17 , pp. 1561-1570.e3
231 views DOI
2019
Validation Study of Elastographies in Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease for Detecting Liver Fibrosis
Kawada, T.
Vol. 17 , pp. 2139-2140
237 views DOI
2017
Faculty Opinions Recommended Article: Efficacy of vedolizumab induction and maintenance therapy in patients with ulcerative colitis, regardless of prior exposure to tumor necrosis factor antagonists.
Feagan BG, Rubin DT, Danese S, Vermeire S, Abhyankar B, Sankoh S, James A, Smyth M.;Feagan BG;Rubin DT;Danese S;Vermeire S;Abhyankar B;Sankoh S;James A;Smyth M;
Vol. 15 , No. 2 , pp. -
238 views Abstract
2013
Internet liability for gastroenterologists: Select issues from social networking to doctor rating sites
Belle, J.
Vol. 11 , pp. 883-886
230 views DOI
42
Overall
Below Average
30
15
30
40
31
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.8/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

31.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.