proceedings of the acm on human-computer interaction | Journament

Journal Ranking

#4509 / 33,958
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 4 weeks ago

proceedings of the acm on human-computer interaction

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name proceedings of the acm on human-computer interaction
Abbreviated Name proceedings of the acm on human-computer interaction
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (13 total)

2017
co2 emissions, health expenditures and economic growth in iran: apply dynamic simultaneous-equations models
;Naghmeh Ghorashi;Abbas Alavi Rad
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 109-116
299 views Abstract
2017
Tuiofx - A JavaFX Toolkit for shared interactive surfaces
Fetter M.
Vol. 1 , pp. 0-0
261 views DOI
2016
study of contamination and risk assessment of heavy metal in fish (otolithes ruber) and sediments from persian gulf
;Habib Janadeleh;Sadigheh Jahangiri
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. 159-181
237 views Abstract
2015
mixed zno-tio2 suspended solution as an efficient photocatalyst for decolonization of a textile dye from waste water
;Mohammad Ali Mooji;Masoumeh Tabatabaee;
Vol. 3 , No. 4 , pp. 261-269
221 views Abstract
2018
many moving parts: evaluating the implementation of the kin keepersm cancer prevention intervention
;Sabrina Ford;Costellia Talley;Cristian Meghea;Karen Patricia Williams
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 32-41
215 views Abstract
2015
effect of satureja hortensis powder supplementation on pain and tnf-α in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a double-blind randomized clinical trial
;Hassan Mozaffari-Khosravi;Maryam Asadi;Ali Dehghan;Hossein Soleimani Salehabadi;Mohammad Reza Sobhan Ardakani;Mohammad Hossein Fallahzadeh Abarghoui
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 148-158
203 views Abstract
2014
comparison predominant oral micro-flora in subjects with and without complete denture referred to yazd dentistry department
;Abbas Ali Jafari;Abbas Fallah Tafti;Ali Fattahi bafghi;Benafshah Arzy
Vol. 3 , No. 3 , pp. 195-203
196 views Abstract
2014
physicians’ awareness in yazd province about biological effects of ionizing radiation applied in radiological imaging procedures
;Ali Chaparian;Hosain Hekmati moghadam;Mahsa Mansourian
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 0-0
177 views Abstract
2013
attitude of supervisors of yazd educational hospitals towards the role of personnel element on the market share of hospital services
;Mohammad Zare Zadeh;Mohammad Reza Vafaei Nasab;Nadjme Hajian
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 131-137
144 views Abstract
2017
an approach to management of health care and medical diagnosis using of a hybrid disease diagnosis system
;Hodjat Hamidi;Maryam Jahanshhi
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 18-33
137 views Abstract
View All 13 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.