Indexed in Journament

journal of anesthesia

ISSN 1438-8359· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
40.6/100
Journament Score
#5,863
Journament Rank
8
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name j anesth
Abbreviated Name journal of anesthesia
ISSN 1438-8359

Indexings

scopus ncbi ulakbim

Publications Per Year

Articles (8)

2020
Effects of intravenous injection of indocyanine green on the oxygen reserve index (ORi™).
Kondo, Hiroshi;Nakamura, Ryuji;Kobatake, Ayako;Nao, Yukiko;Hashimoto, Ken;Nakatani, Keio;
197 views DOI Abstract
2018
Pecs II block for intractable postherpetic neuralgia
Oh, D.
Vol. 32 , pp. 460
201 views DOI
2017
Paravertebral block catheter breakage by electrocautery during thoracic surgery
Saeki, N.
Vol. 31 , pp. 463-466
234 views DOI
2016
Comparison of general anesthesia and monitored anesthesia care in patients undergoing breast cancer surgery using a combination of ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral block and local infiltration anesthesia: a retrospective study
Sato, M.
Vol. 30 , pp. 244-251
288 views DOI
2015
History of T-cain: a local anesthetic developed and manufactured in Japan.
Tobe, Masaru;Saito, Shigeru;
Vol. 29 , No. 5 , pp. 763-8
222 views DOI Abstract
2015
Ultrasound-guided continuous thoracic paravertebral block provides comparable analgesia and fewer episodes of hypotension than continuous epidural block after lung surgery
Okajima, H.
Vol. 29 , pp. 373-378
273 views DOI
2014
Does the addition of magnesium to bupivacaine improve postoperative analgesia of ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral block in patients undergoing thoracic surgery?
Ammar, A.
Vol. 28 , pp. 58-63
338 views DOI
2013
Effects of epidural analgesia on labor length, instrumental delivery, and neonatal short-term outcome
Hasegawa, J.
Vol. 27 , pp. 43-47
211 views DOI
41
Overall
Below Average
30
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.6/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.