Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR | Journament

Journal Ranking

#242 / 33,939
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
42.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name J Clin Diagn Res
Abbreviated Name j clin diagn res
ISSN 2249-782X
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.jcdr.net
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (25 total)

2017
Fungal Opportunistic Pneumonias in HIV/AIDS Patients: An Indian Tertiary Care Experience.
Kaur, Ravinder;Mehra, Bhanu;Dhakad, Megh Singh;Goyal, Ritu;Bhalla, Preena;Dewan, Richa;
Vol. 11 , No. 2 , pp. DC14-DC19
330 views DOI Abstract
2016
Vitamin Supplementation as an Adjuvant Treatment for Alzheimer's Disease.
Bhatti, Adnan Bashir;Usman, Muhammad;Ali, Farhan;Satti, Siddique Akbar;
Vol. 10 , No. 8 , pp. OE07-11
320 views DOI Abstract
2016
Epithelial - Mesenchymal Interactions in Tooth Development and the Significant Role of Growth Factors and Genes with Emphasis on Mesenchyme - A Review.
Puthiyaveetil, Jaya Sekharan Vannadil;Kota, Kasim;Chakkarayan, Roopesh;Chakkarayan, Jithesh;Thodiyil, Abdul Kabeer Padinhare;
Vol. 10 , No. 9 , pp. ZE05-ZE09
302 views DOI Abstract
2011
manfaat workshop penelitian tindakan kelas dan penulisan karya ilmiah bagi kelompok kerja guru gugus sekolah satriyo utomo kecamatan ngawen blora tahun 2010
;Nur Khoiri;Ngurah Ayu N. M.;Didik Ariyanto;Rinawati Ariesta
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 78-86
280 views DOI Abstract
2017
ibm peternak lele semarang barat
;Mudzanatun Mudzanatun;Ryky Mandarsari;Dwi Prasetyo Hadi
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. 184-190
259 views DOI Abstract
2016
Evaluation of Antibiotic Residues in Pasteurized and Raw Milk Distributed in the South of Khorasan-e Razavi Province, Iran.
Moghadam, Mortez Mohammadzadeh;Amiri, Mostafa;Riabi, Hamed Ramezani Awal;Riabi, Hamid Ramezani Awal;
Vol. 10 , No. 12 , pp. FC31-FC35
248 views DOI Abstract
2015
How can Doctors Improve their Communication Skills?
Ranjan P;Kumari A;Chakrawarty A;;
Vol. 9 , No. 3 , pp. -
244 views Abstract
2017
Indian Soldiers Need Eye Protection.
Jha, Kirti Nath;
Vol. 11 , No. 2 , pp. NE01-NE03
232 views DOI Abstract
2016
ibm batik kendal sebagai upaya peningkatan kualitas produk batik kendal
;Oktaviani Adhi Suciptaningsih;Intan Rahmawati;Eka Sari Setianingsih
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 39-51
226 views DOI Abstract
2012
pembuatan media pembelajaran berbasis multimedia interaktif dan video menggunakan program camtasia oleh kelompok guru-guru sdit
;Harto Nuroso;Joko Saefan;Choirul Huda
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 11-16
223 views DOI Abstract
View All 25 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.4/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.