Indexed in Journament

japanese journal of ophthalmology

ISSN 0021-5155· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
39.0 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #12,453 of 33,995 indexed journals
9 Articles
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name japanese journal of ophthalmology
Abbreviated Name japanese journal of ophthalmology
ISSN 0021-5155

Publications Per Year

Articles (9)

2018
Effect of spectacle lenses designed to reduce relative peripheral hyperopia on myopia progression in Japanese children: a 2-year multicenter randomized controlled trial
Vol. 62 , No. 5 , pp. -
506 views Abstract
2019
Evaluation of deep convolutional neural networks for glaucoma detection
Vol. 63 , No. 3 , pp. -
446 views Abstract
1990
New wound-healing model using cultured corneal endothelial cells. 1. Quantitative study of healing process
Vol. 34 , No. 3 , pp. -
376 views Abstract
2019
1991
Corneal endothelial cell damage in penetrating keratoplasty
Vol. 35 , No. 4 , pp. -
352 views Abstract
2015
Indications for and effects of Nunchaku-style silicone tube intubation for primary acquired lacrimal drainage obstruction
Vol. 59 , No. 4 , pp. 266-272
304 views DOI Abstract
2009
Dacryoendoscopic surgery and tube insertion in patients with common canalicular obstruction and ductal stenosis as a frequent complication
Vol. 53 , No. 2 , pp. 145-150
273 views DOI Abstract
2025
Neuro-ophthalmic findings of Visual Snow Syndrome in Korea.
101 views DOI Abstract
2025
Neuro-ophthalmic findings of Visual Snow Syndrome in Korea.
101 views DOI Abstract
2019
Evaluation of deep convolutional neural networks for glaucoma detection
Vol. 63 , No. 3 , pp. -
446 views Abstract
2019
2018
Effect of spectacle lenses designed to reduce relative peripheral hyperopia on myopia progression in Japanese children: a 2-year multicenter randomized controlled trial
Vol. 62 , No. 5 , pp. -
506 views Abstract
2015
Indications for and effects of Nunchaku-style silicone tube intubation for primary acquired lacrimal drainage obstruction
Vol. 59 , No. 4 , pp. 266-272
304 views DOI Abstract
2009
Dacryoendoscopic surgery and tube insertion in patients with common canalicular obstruction and ductal stenosis as a frequent complication
Vol. 53 , No. 2 , pp. 145-150
273 views DOI Abstract
1991
Corneal endothelial cell damage in penetrating keratoplasty
Vol. 35 , No. 4 , pp. -
352 views Abstract
1990
New wound-healing model using cultured corneal endothelial cells. 1. Quantitative study of healing process
Vol. 34 , No. 3 , pp. -
376 views Abstract
Journament Score
39.0/100 · Poor
Ranked #12,453 of 33,995
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

39.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

75.2/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.