Indexed in Journament

Indian journal of ophthalmology

ISSN 1998-3689· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
37.4 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #10,709 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
18 Articles
Scores higher than 63.5% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Indian J Ophthalmol
Abbreviated Name indian journal of ophthalmology
ISSN 1998-3689

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Indian journal of ophthalmology
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.1
Accessibility 15.0 17.9
Timeliness 50.0 19.2
Diversity 30.0 28.8
Innovation 40.0 31.2
Community Impact 36.5 13.4
Content Distribution 61.0 88.4
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (18)

2016
Prevalent practice patterns in glaucoma: Poll of Indian ophthalmologists at a national conference
Vol. 64 , No. 10 , pp. 715-721
535 views Abstract
2009
Analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms of <i> CRYGA</i> and <i> CRYGB</i> genes in control population of western Indian origin
Vol. 57 , No. 3 , pp. 197-201
468 views Abstract
2016
Burden and depression in primary caregivers of persons with visual impairment
Vol. 64 , No. 8 , pp. 572-577
414 views Abstract
2012
Changing trends in the prevalence of blindness and visual impairment in a rural district of India: Systematic observations over a decade
Vol. 60 , No. 5 , pp. 492-497
384 views Abstract
2018
Quality indicators for eye bank
Vol. 66 , No. 3 , pp. 389-393
361 views Abstract
2012
2020
A scientometric analysis of literature published in Indian Journal of Ophthalmology from 2005 to 2017.
Vol. 68 , No. 5 , pp. 738-744
341 views DOI Abstract
2020
Primary eye care in India - The vision center model.
Vol. 68 , No. 2 , pp. 333-339
314 views DOI Abstract
1983
Static perimetry in glaucoma-an evaluation
Vol. 31 , No. 2 , pp. 57-60
259 views
2021
Epidemiology, clinical profile, management, and outcome of COVID-19-associated rhino-orbital-cerebral mucormycosis in 2826 patients in India – Collaborative OPAI-IJO Study on Mucormycosis in COVID-19 (COSMIC), Report 1
Vol. 69 , No. 7 , pp. 1670-1692
89 views Abstract
2021
Specular microscopy in clinical practice
Vol. 69 , No. 3 , pp. 517-
25 views DOI Abstract
2021
Specular microscopy in clinical practice
Vol. 69 , No. 3 , pp. -
242 views Abstract
2021
keratitis: Clinical profile, laboratory diagnosis, treatment, and histopathology features post-treatment at a tertiary eye care center in Eastern India.
Vol. 69 , No. 6 , pp. 1544-1552
246 views DOI Abstract
2020
Corneal ulcer and germinated paddy seed in the superior fornix.
Vol. 68 , No. 8 , pp. 1661
203 views DOI
2020
A scientometric analysis of literature published in Indian Journal of Ophthalmology from 2005 to 2017.
Vol. 68 , No. 5 , pp. 738-744
341 views DOI Abstract
2020
Primary eye care in India - The vision center model.
Vol. 68 , No. 2 , pp. 333-339
314 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
37.4/100 · Poor
Ranked #10,709 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

37.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

61.0/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.