combinatorial chemistry and high throughput screening | Journament

Journal Ranking

#577 / 33,944
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
33
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

combinatorial chemistry and high throughput screening

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name combinatorial chemistry and high throughput screening
Abbreviated Name combinatorial chemistry and high throughput screening
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL https://benthamscience.com/journals/combinatorial-chemistry-and-high-throughput-screening
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (22 total)

2017
design for limit stresses of orange fruits (citrus sinensis) under axial and radial compression as related to transportation and storage design
;Christopher Chukwutoo Ihueze;Chika Edith Mgbemena
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. 72-81
458 views DOI Abstract
2015
evidence for the microbial degradation of imidacloprid in soils of cameron highlands
;Nasrin Sabourmoghaddam;Mohamad Pauzi Zakaria;Dzolkhifli Omar
Vol. 14 , No. 2 , pp. 182-188
320 views DOI Abstract
2012
growth, biochemical components and ion content of chamomile (matricaria chamomilla l.) under salinity stress and iron deficiency
;Mostafa Heidari;Semin Sarani
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 37-42
312 views DOI Abstract
2015
production of “peanut milk” based beverages enriched with umbu and guava pulps
;Esther Maria Barros de Albuquerque;Francisco de Assis Cardoso Almeida;Josivanda Palmeira Gomes;Niédja Marizze Cezar Alves;Wilton Pereira da Silva
Vol. 14 , No. 1 , pp. 61-67
275 views DOI Abstract
2012
effects of pesticides on plant growth promoting traits of mesorhizobium strain mrc4
;Munees Ahemad;Mohammad Saghir Khan
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 63-71
252 views DOI Abstract
2015
effects of cover crops and weed management on corn yield
;Farhood Yeganehpoor;Saeed Zehtab Salmasi;Ghassem Abedi;Farideh Samadiyan;Vahid Beyginiya
Vol. 14 , No. 2 , pp. 178-181
246 views DOI Abstract
2012
do grain reserves necessarily contribute to prices stability and food security in sudan? an assessment
;Adam E. Ahmed;Sawsan M. Abdelsalam;Khalid H.A. Siddig
Vol. 11 , No. 2 , pp. 143-148
246 views DOI Abstract
2017
hyperaccumulation activity and metabolic responses of solanum nigrum in two differentially polluted growth habitats
;Khalil M. Saad-Allah;M.A. Elhaak
Vol. 16 , No. 3 , pp. 227-235
244 views DOI Abstract
2013
cross talk between arsenic and cold on the regulation of inorganic phosphate level in peripheral tissues of fresh water fishes (channa punctata)
;Md. Shahidul Haque;Swapan Kumar Roy
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 1-7
242 views DOI Abstract
2013
effect of breed, age and storage period on egg weight, egg weight loss and chick weight of commercial broiler breeders raised in saudi arabia
;A.A. Alsobayel;M.A. Almarshade;M.A. Albadry
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 53-57
222 views DOI Abstract
View All 22 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.3/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

32.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.