Indexed in Journament

european urology

ISSN 1873-7560· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
24.5 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #27,227 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
15 Articles
Scores higher than 7.1% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name eur urol
Abbreviated Name eur urol
ISSN 1873-7560

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.4
Timeliness 0.0
Diversity 5.6
Innovation 25.5
Community Impact 7.9
Content Distribution 71.1
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.4
Accessibility — 20.4
Timeliness 0.0 5.8
Diversity 5.6 24.4
Innovation 25.5 25.7
Community Impact 7.9 5.8
Content Distribution 71.1 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (15)

2013
Words of wisdom: re: high-throughput lensfree 3D tracking of human sperms reveals rare statistics of helical trajectories.
Cardona-Maya, Walter;
Vol. 63 , No. 4 , pp. 768-9
454 views DOI
2016
The Effect of Salvage Radiotherapy and its Timing on the Health-related Quality of Life of Prostate Cancer Patients.
van Stam, Marie-Anne;Aaronson, Neil K;Pos, Floris J;Bosch, J L H Ruud;Kieffer, Jacobien M;Tillier, Corinne N;van der Poel, Henk G;
Vol. 70 , No. 5 , pp. 751-757
443 views DOI Abstract
2013
Words of wisdom. Re: Increased pregnancy after reduced male abstinence.
Mayorga-Torres, B Jose Manuel;Cardona-Maya, Walter;
Vol. 64 , No. 5 , pp. 860-1
431 views DOI
2020
Re: Aurélie De Bruycker, Elise De Bleser, Karel Decaestecker, et al. Nodal Oligorecurrent Prostate Cancer: Anatomic Pattern of Possible Treatment Failure in Relation to Elective Surgical and Radiotherapy Treatment Templates. Eur Urol 2019;75:826-33: Nodal Recurrence of Prostate Cancer in Patients Treated with Radical Intent: Tailoring the Best Salvage Treatment.
Montorsi, Francesco;Fossati, Nicola;Gandaglia, Giorgio;Briganti, Alberto;
408 views DOI
2018
Re: Nicolas Mottet, Joaquim Bellmunt, Erik Briers, et al. EAU-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. European Association of Urology; 2017. http://uroweb.org/guideline/prostate-cancer: How to Assess the Efficacy of Medical Castration.
Morote, Juan;Comas, Imma;Planas, Jacques;
Vol. 73 , No. 5 , pp. e134-e135
393 views DOI
2019
Challenges and Prospects of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell Therapy for Metastatic Prostate Cancer.
Gorchakov, Andrey A;Kulemzin, Sergey V;Kochneva, Galina V;Taranin, Aleksandr V;
356 views DOI Abstract
2020
Surgical Safety of Radical Cystectomy and Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection Following Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab in Patients with Bladder Cancer: Prospective Assessment of Perioperative Outcomes from the PURE-01 Trial
Briganti, A.
, pp. 0-0
344 views DOI
2019
Reply to Xueliang Zhou and Xinwei Han's Letter to the Editor re: Thomas Van den Broeck, Roderick C.N. van den Bergh, Nicolas Arfi, et al. Prognostic Value of Biochemical Recurrence Following Treatment with Curative Intent for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review. Eur Urol 2019;75:967–87
Van, den Broeck T.
Vol. 76 , pp. e16
340 views DOI
2019
The European Prostate Cancer Centres of Excellence: A Novel Proposal from the European Association of Urology Prostate Cancer Centre Consensus Meeting
Wirth, M.
Vol. 76 , pp. 179-186
334 views DOI
2019
Re: Paternal Lifestyle Factors in Relation to Semen Quality and In Vitro Reproductive Outcomes.
Gutiérrez, Alejandra María Gómez;Cardona Maya, Walter D;
Vol. 75 , No. 2 , pp. 343-344
329 views DOI
2020
Re: The Association Between In-Utero Exposure to Stressful Life Events During Pregnancy and Male Reproductive Function in a Cohort of 20-year-old Offspring: The Raine Study.
Gómez Gutiérrez, Alejandra María;Cardona Maya, Walter D;
Vol. 77 , No. 1 , pp. 133-134
230 views DOI
2020
Re: Aurélie De Bruycker, Elise De Bleser, Karel Decaestecker, et al. Nodal Oligorecurrent Prostate Cancer: Anatomic Pattern of Possible Treatment Failure in Relation to Elective Surgical and Radiotherapy Treatment Templates. Eur Urol 2019;75:826-33: Nodal Recurrence of Prostate Cancer in Patients Treated with Radical Intent: Tailoring the Best Salvage Treatment.
Montorsi, Francesco;Fossati, Nicola;Gandaglia, Giorgio;Briganti, Alberto;
408 views DOI
2020
Surgical Safety of Radical Cystectomy and Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection Following Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab in Patients with Bladder Cancer: Prospective Assessment of Perioperative Outcomes from the PURE-01 Trial
Briganti, A.
, pp. 0-0
344 views DOI
2019
Re: Baris Turkbey, Andrew B. Rosenkrantz, Masoom A. Haider, et al. Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.1: 2019 Update of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2. Eur Urol 2019;76:340–51
Park, B.K.
Vol. 76 , pp. e78
39 views DOI
2019
Reply to Byung Kwan Park's Letter to the Editor re: Baris Turkbey, Andrew B. Rosenkrantz, Masoom A. Haider, et al. Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.1: 2019 Update of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2. Eur Urol 2019;76:329–40
Rosenkrantz, A.B.
Vol. 76 , pp. e79
68 views DOI
2019
The European Prostate Cancer Centres of Excellence: A Novel Proposal from the European Association of Urology Prostate Cancer Centre Consensus Meeting
Wirth, M.
Vol. 76 , pp. 179-186
334 views DOI
2019
Centers of Excellence: What are Realistic Goals?
Albertsen, P.
Vol. 76 , pp. 187-188
223 views DOI
2019
Reply to Xueliang Zhou and Xinwei Han's Letter to the Editor re: Thomas Van den Broeck, Roderick C.N. van den Bergh, Nicolas Arfi, et al. Prognostic Value of Biochemical Recurrence Following Treatment with Curative Intent for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review. Eur Urol 2019;75:967–87
Van, den Broeck T.
Vol. 76 , pp. e16
340 views DOI
2019
Re: Paternal Lifestyle Factors in Relation to Semen Quality and In Vitro Reproductive Outcomes.
Gutiérrez, Alejandra María Gómez;Cardona Maya, Walter D;
Vol. 75 , No. 2 , pp. 343-344
329 views DOI
2019
Somatic to Autonomic Nerve Grafting for the Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction: It Seems to Work, But How?
Dovey, Z.
Vol. 76 , pp. 197-199
242 views DOI
Journament Score
24.5/100 · Poor
Ranked #27,227 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

24.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

25.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

71.1/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.