EMBO reports | Journament

Journal Ranking

#6665 / 33,986
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
33
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 5 days ago

EMBO reports

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name EMBO reports
Abbreviated Name embo rep
ISSN 1469-3178
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (8 total)

2020
Bio-informational futures: The convergence of artificial intelligence and synthetic biology.
A Dixon, Thom;C Curach, Natalie;Pretorius, Isak S;
, pp. e50036
360 views DOI Abstract
2019
The limits of machine intelligence: Despite progress in machine intelligence, artificial general intelligence is still a major challenge.
Shevlin, Henry;Vold, Karina;Crosby, Matthew;Halina, Marta;
, pp. e49177
353 views DOI Abstract
2019
CSI wildlife: How science is helping detectives to track down poaching and illegal trade in wildlife.
Gristwood, Adam;
Vol. 20 , No. 1
347 views DOI
2020
Long non-coding RNA uc.291 controls epithelial differentiation by interfering with the ACTL6A/BAF complex.
Panatta, Emanuele;Lena, Anna Maria;Mancini, Mara;Smirnov, Artem;Marini, Alberto;Delli Ponti, Riccardo;Botta-Orfila, Teresa;Tartaglia, Gian Gaetano;Mauriello, Alessandro;Zhang, Xinna;Calin, George A;Melino, Gerry;Candi, Eleonora;
, pp. e46734
321 views DOI Abstract
2008
The nature and character of the transition state for the ADP-ribosyltransferase reaction
Jørgensen R;Wang Y;Visschedyk D;Merrill AR;;
Vol. 9 , No. 8 , pp. -
318 views Abstract
2019
Robotic platform for microinjection into single cells in brain tissue.
Shull, Gabriella;Haffner, Christiane;Huttner, Wieland B;Kodandaramaiah, Suhasa B;Taverna, Elena;
, pp. e47880
293 views DOI Abstract
2020
SMC5/6 acts jointly with Fanconi anemia factors to support DNA repair and genome stability
Rossi, F.
Vol. 21 , pp. 0-0
254 views DOI
2014
Laboratory without walls
Jacobs, Howy;
Vol. 15 , No. 7 , pp. 731-731
72 views DOI
40
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.