cytotechnology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3176 / 33,956
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 weeks ago

cytotechnology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim
Short Name cytotechnology
Abbreviated Name cytotechnology
ISSN 0920-9069
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.springer.com/journal/10616
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (30 total)

2020
Assessment of proliferation, migration and differentiation potentials of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells labeling with silica-coated and amine-modified superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles.
Yao, Dong;Liu, Na-Na;Mo, Bi-Wen;
368 views DOI Abstract
2019
Apoptosis-inducing activities of Halopteris scoparia L. Sauvageau (Brown algae) on cancer cells and its biosafety and antioxidant properties.
Güner, Adem;Nalbantsoy, Ayşe;Sukatar, Atakan;Karabay Yavaşoğlu, Nefise Ülkü;
Vol. 71 , No. 3 , pp. 687-704
328 views DOI Abstract
2018
A comparative study of biotechnological approaches for producing valuable flavonoids in Prosopis farcta.
Zafari, Somaieh;Sharifi, Mohsen;Chashmi, Najmeh Ahmadian;
Vol. 70 , No. 2 , pp. 603-614
312 views DOI Abstract
2012
psychosocial aspects of managing of interpersonal relations with disabled customers
;Tomasz Kruszewski
Vol. 11 , No. 11 , pp. 349-362
296 views Abstract
2011
Comparison of tetrahydrofuran, fetal calf serum, and Tween 40 for the delivery of astaxanthin and canthaxanthin to HepG2 cells
Boesch-Saadatmandi, C.
Vol. 63 , pp. 89-97
290 views DOI
2020
Photobiomodulation effects on osteogenic differentiation of adipose-derived stem cells.
Bölükbaşı Ateş, Gamze;Ak, Ayşe;Garipcan, Bora;Gülsoy, Murat;
284 views DOI Abstract
2019
Cytotoxic and antioxidant properties of essential oil of Centaurea behen L. in vitro.
Çelikezen, Fatih Çağlar;Hayta, Şükrü;Özdemir, Özlem;Türkez, Hasan;
Vol. 71 , No. 1 , pp. 345-350
267 views DOI Abstract
2016
actions of financial institutions in poland in the context of socially responsible management of human resources
;Justyna Kłobukowska
Vol. 15 , No. 4 , pp. 31-40
249 views DOI Abstract
2016
macroeconomic, legal, administrative and cultural factors of technological innovations1 in polish industrial enterprises
;Stanisław Sudoł
Vol. 15 , No. 4 , pp. 5-16
234 views DOI Abstract
2011
model of the naval base logistic interoperability within the multinational operations
;Bohdan Pac
Vol. 10 , No. 10 , pp. 301-320
218 views Abstract
View All 30 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
30
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.