Indexed in Journament

journal of pediatric endocrinology & metabolism : jpem

ISSN 2191-0251· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
39.1 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #11,445 of 33,995 indexed journals
13 Articles
Accessibility 15
Engagement 31
The Journament Score combines content quality, publication ethics and transparency, editorial standards, publication regularity, accessibility and reader engagement into a single 0–100 figure. It is recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed.

About This Journal

Short Name j pediatr endocrinol metab
Abbreviated Name j pediatr endocrinol metab
ISSN 2191-0251

Publications Per Year

Articles (13)

2020
Identification of two novel variants in GAA underlying infantile-onset Pompe disease in two Pakistani families.
612 views DOI Abstract
2020
The effect of celiac disease and gluten-free diet on pubertal development: a two-center study.
433 views DOI Abstract
2020
Prevalence of obesity and overweight in Iranian students: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
427 views DOI Abstract
2019
Nutrition and medical support during pregnancy and lactation in women with inborn errors of intermediary metabolism disorders (IEMDs).
423 views DOI Abstract
2020
The decision-making levels of urine tetrasaccharide for the diagnosis of Pompe disease in the Turkish population.
413 views DOI Abstract
2019
Clinical findings in five Turkish patients with citrin deficiency and identification of a novel mutation on SLC25A13.
411 views DOI Abstract
2020
Two different missense mutations of PEX genes in two similar patients with severe Zellweger syndrome: an argument on the genotype-phenotype correlation.
392 views DOI Abstract
2019
Adiposity and attained height in adolescents: a longitudinal analysis from the LabMed Physical Activity Study.
391 views DOI Abstract
2019
Can preimplantation genetic diagnosis be used for monogenic endocrine diseases?
, pp. 0-0
301 views DOI Abstract
2021
Growth hormone treatment and bone mineral density in pediatric patients with Prader-Willi syndrome
Vol. 34 , No. 9 , pp. -
170 views Abstract
2021
Retrospective evaluation of patients with X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy with a wide range of clinical presentations: a single center experience
, pp. -
136 views Abstract
2020
Prevalence of obesity and overweight in Iranian students: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
427 views DOI Abstract
2020
Two different missense mutations of PEX genes in two similar patients with severe Zellweger syndrome: an argument on the genotype-phenotype correlation.
392 views DOI Abstract
2020
The effect of celiac disease and gluten-free diet on pubertal development: a two-center study.
433 views DOI Abstract
2020
The decision-making levels of urine tetrasaccharide for the diagnosis of Pompe disease in the Turkish population.
413 views DOI Abstract
2020
Identification of two novel variants in GAA underlying infantile-onset Pompe disease in two Pakistani families.
612 views DOI Abstract
2019
Nutrition and medical support during pregnancy and lactation in women with inborn errors of intermediary metabolism disorders (IEMDs).
423 views DOI Abstract
2019
Clinical findings in five Turkish patients with citrin deficiency and identification of a novel mutation on SLC25A13.
411 views DOI Abstract
2019
Can preimplantation genetic diagnosis be used for monogenic endocrine diseases?
, pp. 0-0
301 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
39.1/100 · Poor
Ranked #11,445 of 33,995

Overall Quality Score

39.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.