nutrition and cancer | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2067 / 33,952
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

nutrition and cancer

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name nutr cancer
Abbreviated Name nutr cancer
ISSN 1532-7914
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/authors/hnucauth.asp
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (15 total)

2019
The Impact of the Disease Trend on the Macro and Micro-Nutrients Intake in Patients with Gastric Cancer.
Vahid, Farhad;Faghfoori, Zeinab;Davoodi, Sayed Hossein;
, pp. 1-7
466 views DOI Abstract
2017
Piperine Triggers Apoptosis of Human Oral Squamous Carcinoma Through Cell Cycle Arrest and Mitochondrial Oxidative Stress.
Siddiqui, Sahabjada;Ahamad, Md Sultan;Jafri, Asif;Afzal, Mohd;Arshad, Md;
Vol. 69 , No. 5 , pp. 791-799
325 views DOI Abstract
2019
Propolis Potentiates Methotrexate Anticancer Mechanism and Reduces its Toxic Effects.
Salem, Maha M;Donia, Thoria;Abu-Khudir, Rasha;Ramadan, Haitham;Ali, Ehab M M;Mohamed, Tarek M;
, pp. 1-21
307 views DOI Abstract
2015
dionisismo y culto prehelÉnico a la “madre”
;Marcello Tozza
Vol. 67 , pp. 59-81
278 views Abstract
2019
Antitumor Effect of Methanol Extract: and Study.
Ben Abdessamad, Imen;Bouhlel, Ines;Chekir-Ghedira, Leila;Krifa, Mounira;
, pp. 1-10
270 views DOI Abstract
2015
beato amadeu, nova apocalipse, d. lucas dias introdução, tradução e notas; d. lucas dias, a. espírito santo, s. tavares de pinho ed. crítica e fixação do texto latino, portugaliae monumenta neolatina vol. xiv, imprensa da universidade de coimbra
;Paula Barata Dias
Vol. 67 , pp. 230-234
246 views Abstract
2016
jesus, carlos a. martins de , pseudo-aristotle. epitaphs for the heroes. pepli epitaphia (appendix planudea). introduction, text, and commentary, 106 pp., logos verlag berlin, 2015, isbn 978-3-8325-4143-9
;Elisabete Cação
Vol. 68 , pp. 257-258
218 views Abstract
2015
pinto, antónio guimarães, apostilas a antónio luís. 1.antónio luís e joão de barros, 2.antónio luís, antónio pinheiro e rodrigo sánchez, cátedra de estudos sefarditas “alberto benveniste”, centro de línguas e culturas da universidade de aveiro, 2013.
;Carlota Miranda Urbano
Vol. 67 , pp. 304-307
212 views Abstract
2014
rogério sousa, m. c. fialho, m. haggag, n. s. rodrigues (eds.) alexandrea ad aegyptum. the legacy of multiculturalism in antiquity, porto, afrontamento/citcem/cech, 2013. 395 pp.
;José Luís Brandão
Vol. 66 , pp. 480-484
208 views Abstract
2016
lópez, a., pociña, a., silva, m. f. (coords.), de ayer a hoy. influencias clásicas en la literatura
;Marta Várzeas
Vol. 65 , No. 1 , pp. 327-332
200 views
View All 15 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.