Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association | Journament

Journal Ranking

#5952 / 33,986
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name Arthroscopy
Abbreviated Name arthroscopy
ISSN 1526-3231
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (15 total)

2017
Patellofemoral Osteoarthritis Progression and Alignment Changes after Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy Do Not Affect Clinical Outcomes at Mid-term Follow-up
Goshima K;Sawaguchi T;Shigemoto K;Iwai S;Nakanishi A;Ueoka K;;
Vol. 33 , No. 10 , pp. -
410 views Abstract
2019
Editorial Commentary: Network Geometry of Nonoperative Management of Patellar Tendinopathy-Can the Shape of the Evidence Inform Practice?
Cote, Mark P;
Vol. 35 , No. 11 , pp. 3132-3134
357 views DOI Abstract
2020
Inside-Out Repair of the Meniscus in Concomitant Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Absorbable Versus Nonabsorbable Sutures.
Yoon, Kyoung Ho;Park, Jae-Young;Kwon, Yoo Beom;Lee, Yeon Jae;Kim, Eung Ju;Kim, Sang-Gyun;
335 views DOI Abstract
2019
Outcome Trends After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement: When Do Patients Improve?
Wolfson, Theodore S;Ryan, Michael K;Begly, John P;Youm, Thomas;
Vol. 35 , No. 12 , pp. 3261-3270
335 views DOI Abstract
2019
Graft Choice for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With a Concomitant Non-surgically Treated Medial Collateral Ligament Injury Does Not Influence the Risk of Revision.
Svantesson, Eleonor;Hamrin Senorski, Eric;Östergaard, Matilda;Grassi, Alberto;Krupic, Ferid;Westin, Olof;Samuelsson, Kristian;
311 views DOI Abstract
2020
The Dancer's Hip: The Hyperflexible Athlete: Anatomy and Mean 3-Year Arthroscopic Clinical Outcomes.
Larson, Christopher M;Ross, James R;Giveans, M Russell;McGaver, Rebecca Stone;Weed, Katelyn N;Bedi, Asheesh;
309 views DOI Abstract
2019
High Risk of Further ACL Injury in a 10-Year Follow-up Study of ACL-Reconstructed Soccer Players in the Swedish National Knee Ligament Registry.
Sandon, Alexander;Engström, Björn;Forssblad, Magnus;
307 views DOI Abstract
2012
Outcome of arthroscopic debridement and microfracture as the primary treatment for osteochondral lesions of the talar dome
Donnenwerth MP;Roukis TS;;
Vol. 28 , No. 12 , pp. -
305 views Abstract
2020
Editorial Commentary: Aim High or Go Low? Outcomes Are Equivalent for Arthroscopic Suprapectoral and Mini-open Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis.
Gowd, Anirudh K;Beck, Edward C;Waterman, Brian R;
Vol. 36 , No. 1 , pp. 33-35
295 views DOI Abstract
2020
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Platelet-Rich Plasma: A Systematic Review of Randomized Control Trials.
Davey, Martin S;Hurley, Eoghan T;Withers, Dan;Moran, Ray;Moran, Cathal J;
266 views DOI Abstract
View All 15 Articles
40
Overall
Below Average
31
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.1/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.