Indexed in Journament

experimental gerontology

ISSN 1873-6815· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
29.4 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #20,765 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
25 Articles
Scores higher than 29.1% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name exp gerontol
Abbreviated Name exp gerontol
ISSN 1873-6815
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/experimental-gerontology

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.7
Accessibility 20.0
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 37.5
Community Impact 7.9
Content Distribution 71.3
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.7 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 20.4
Timeliness 0.0 5.8
Diversity — 24.4
Innovation 37.5 25.7
Community Impact 7.9 5.8
Content Distribution 71.3 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (25)

2019
Effects of resistance training concentric velocity on older adults' functional capacity: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials.
da Rosa Orssatto, Lucas Bet;de la Rocha Freitas, Cintia;Shield, Anthony J;Silveira Pinto, Ronei;Trajano, Gabriel Siqueira;
, pp. 110731
593 views DOI Abstract
2020
Optimal lighting levels for stair safety: Influence of lightbulb type and brightness on confidence, dynamic balance and stepping characteristics.
Thomas, Neil M;Skervin, Timmion;Foster, Richard J;O'Brien, Thomas D;Carpenter, Mark G;Maganaris, Constantinos N;Baltzopoulos, Vasilious;Lees, Carolyn;Hollands, Mark A;
, pp. 110839
442 views DOI Abstract
2019
Pharmacological investigation of 'HIM-CHX': A herbal combination in the experimental muscle wasting condition.
Mukhram, Mohammed Azeemuddin;Rao, Chamallamudi Mallikarjuna;Rafiq, Mohamed;Babu, Uddagiri Venkanna;Paramesh, Rangesh;
, pp. 110663
424 views DOI Abstract
2019
Circulating amino acid signature in older people with Parkinson's disease: A metabolic complement to the EXosomes in PArkiNson Disease (EXPAND) study
Picca, A.
Vol. 128 , pp. 0-0
371 views DOI
2014
constraining the stream power law: a novel approach combining a landscape evolution model and an inversion method
;T. Croissant;J. Braun
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 155-166
334 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effects of a diabetes-specific care model for hip fractured older patients with diabetes: A randomized controlled trial.
Tseng, Ming-Yueh;Liang, Jersey;Wang, Jong-Shyan;Yang, Ching-Tzu;Wu, Chi-Chuan;Cheng, Huey-Shinn;Chen, Ching-Yen;Lin, Yueh-E;Wang, Woan-Shyuan;Shyu, Yea-Ing L;
Vol. 126 , pp. 110689
312 views DOI Abstract
2014
preservation of terrestrial organic carbon in marine sediments offshore taiwan: mountain building and atmospheric carbon dioxide sequestration
;S.-J. Kao;R. G. Hilton;K. Selvaraj;M. Dai;F. Zehetner;J.-C. Huang;S.-C. Hsu;R. Sparkes;J. T. Liu;T.-Y. Lee;J.-Y. T. Yang;A. Galy;X. Xu;N. Hovius
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 127-139
311 views DOI Abstract
2020
Difference in sarcopenia prevalence and associated factors according to 2010 and 2018 European consensus (EWGSOP) in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
de, Freitas M.
Vol. 132 , pp. 0-0
308 views DOI
2017
coupling slope–area analysis, integral approach and statistic tests to steady-state bedrock river profile analysis
;Y. Wang;H. Zhang;D. Zheng;J. Yu;J. Pang;Y. Ma
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 145-160
292 views DOI Abstract
2020
PON1 status and homocysteine levels as potential biomarkers for cardiovascular disease
N. Ponce-Ruiz,F.E. Murillo-González,A.E. Rojas-García,B.S. Barrón-Vivanco,Y.Y. Bernal-Hernández,C.A. González-Arias,L. Ortega-Cervantes,J. Ponce-Gallegos,O. López-Guarnido,I.M. Medina-Díaz;N. Ponce-Ruiz;F.E. Murillo-González;A.E. Rojas-García;B.S. Barrón-Vivanco;Y.Y. Bernal-Hernández;C.A. González-Arias;L. Ortega-Cervantes;J. Ponce-Gallegos;O. López-Guarnido;I.M. Medina-Díaz;
Vol. 140 , pp. 111062-
289 views DOI
2020
PON1 status and homocysteine levels as potential biomarkers for cardiovascular disease
N. Ponce-Ruiz,F.E. Murillo-González,A.E. Rojas-García,B.S. Barrón-Vivanco,Y.Y. Bernal-Hernández,C.A. González-Arias,L. Ortega-Cervantes,J. Ponce-Gallegos,O. López-Guarnido,I.M. Medina-Díaz;N. Ponce-Ruiz;F.E. Murillo-González;A.E. Rojas-García;B.S. Barrón-Vivanco;Y.Y. Bernal-Hernández;C.A. González-Arias;L. Ortega-Cervantes;J. Ponce-Gallegos;O. López-Guarnido;I.M. Medina-Díaz;
Vol. 140 , pp. 111062-
289 views DOI
2020
Difference in sarcopenia prevalence and associated factors according to 2010 and 2018 European consensus (EWGSOP) in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
de, Freitas M.
Vol. 132 , pp. 0-0
308 views DOI
2020
Optimal lighting levels for stair safety: Influence of lightbulb type and brightness on confidence, dynamic balance and stepping characteristics.
Thomas, Neil M;Skervin, Timmion;Foster, Richard J;O'Brien, Thomas D;Carpenter, Mark G;Maganaris, Constantinos N;Baltzopoulos, Vasilious;Lees, Carolyn;Hollands, Mark A;
, pp. 110839
442 views DOI Abstract
2019
Circulating amino acid signature in older people with Parkinson's disease: A metabolic complement to the EXosomes in PArkiNson Disease (EXPAND) study
Picca, A.
Vol. 128 , pp. 0-0
371 views DOI
2019
Effects of resistance training concentric velocity on older adults' functional capacity: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials.
da Rosa Orssatto, Lucas Bet;de la Rocha Freitas, Cintia;Shield, Anthony J;Silveira Pinto, Ronei;Trajano, Gabriel Siqueira;
, pp. 110731
593 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effects of a diabetes-specific care model for hip fractured older patients with diabetes: A randomized controlled trial.
Tseng, Ming-Yueh;Liang, Jersey;Wang, Jong-Shyan;Yang, Ching-Tzu;Wu, Chi-Chuan;Cheng, Huey-Shinn;Chen, Ching-Yen;Lin, Yueh-E;Wang, Woan-Shyuan;Shyu, Yea-Ing L;
Vol. 126 , pp. 110689
312 views DOI Abstract
2019
Pharmacological investigation of 'HIM-CHX': A herbal combination in the experimental muscle wasting condition.
Mukhram, Mohammed Azeemuddin;Rao, Chamallamudi Mallikarjuna;Rafiq, Mohamed;Babu, Uddagiri Venkanna;Paramesh, Rangesh;
, pp. 110663
424 views DOI Abstract
2018
the google earth engine digitisation tool (geedit) and the margin change quantification tool (maqit) – simple tools for the rapid mapping and quantification of changing earth surface margins
;J. M. Lea
Vol. 6 , pp. 551-561
237 views DOI Abstract
2018
drainage reorganization and divide migration induced by the excavation of the ebro basin (ne spain)
;A. Vacherat;S. Bonnet;F. Mouthereau
Vol. 6 , pp. 369-387
246 views DOI Abstract
2017
model predictions of long-lived storage of organic carbon in river deposits
;M. A. Torres;A. B. Limaye;V. Ganti;M. P. Lamb;A. J. West;W. W. Fischer
Vol. 5 , pp. 711-730
208 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
29.4/100 · Poor
Ranked #20,765 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

29.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

37.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

71.3/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.