journal of health and safety at work | Journament

Journal Ranking

#8547 / 33,982
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
33
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

journal of health and safety at work

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
doaj
Short Name journal of health and safety at work
Abbreviated Name journal of health and safety at work
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (15 total)

2018
incidence of diabetes mellitus-related comorbidities among patients attending two major hiv clinics in botswana: a 12-year retrospective cohort study
;Goabaone Rankgoane-Pono;Jose Gaby Tshikuka;Mgaywa Gilbert Mjungu Damas Magafu;Tiny Masupe;Mooketsi Molefi;Shimeles Genna Hamda;Vincent Setlhare;Roy Tapera;Bontle Mbongwe
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 1-5
713 views DOI Abstract
2020
trypanosome infection rate in glossina tachinoides: infested rivers of limmu kosa district jimma zone, western ethiopia
;Behablom Meharenet;Dereje Alemu
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 1-5
524 views DOI Abstract
2018
comparing 16s rdna amplicon sequencing and hybridization capture for pea aphid microbiota diversity analysis
;Marie Cariou;Céline Ribière;Stéphanie Morlière;Jean-Pierre Gauthier;Jean-Christophe Simon;Pierre Peyret;Sylvain Charlat
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 1-5
424 views DOI Abstract
2019
a case series of venous thromboembolic disease in a semi-urban setting in cameroon
;Clovis Nkoke;Denis Teuwafeu;Alice Mapina;Cyrille Nkouonlack
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 1-3
402 views DOI Abstract
2018
grass is not always greener: rodenticide exposure of a threatened species near marijuana growing operations
;Alan B. Franklin;Peter C. Carlson;Angela Rex;Jeremy T. Rockweit;David Garza;Emily Culhane;Steven F. Volker;Robert J. Dusek;Valerie I. Shearn-Bochsler;Mourad W. Gabriel;Katherine E. Horak
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 1-7
353 views DOI Abstract
2018
effect of fto rs9939609 variant on insulin resistance in obese female adolescents
;Kristy Iskandar;Suryono Yudha Patria;Emy Huriyati;Harry Freitag Luglio;Madarina Julia;Rina Susilowati
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 1-5
305 views DOI Abstract
2019
“there is no reward penny for going out and picking up youths”: issues in the design of accessible youth healthcare services in rural northern sweden
;Cecilia Hultstrand Ahlin;Dean Carson;Isabel Goicolea
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 1-6
304 views DOI Abstract
2012
Investigating workload and its relationship with fatigue among train drivers in Keshesh section of Iranian Railway Company
, ;, ;, ;, ;, ;
Vol. 2 , No. 3 , pp. 1-8
296 views Abstract
2015
Accident investigation of construction sites in Qom city using Pareto chart (2009-2012)
Beheshti, M. H.;Khodaparast, E.;Talebe, S.;, ;
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 75-84
279 views Abstract
2015
Ergonomic Assessment and Design of Electronic Ticket Booths in Mashhad City
Razavi, H. ;Behbudi, A. ;
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 75-88
270 views Abstract
View All 15 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

32.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.