Indexed in Journament

jmir rehabilitation and assistive technologies

ISSN 2369-2529· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
32.0 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #17,380 of 29,330 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
14 Articles
Scores higher than 40.7% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name jmir rehabil assist technol
Abbreviated Name jmir rehabil assist technol
ISSN 2369-2529

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 31.0
Timeliness 0.0
Diversity 5.6
Innovation 64.5
Community Impact 22.9
Content Distribution 68.3
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.0 30.3
Accessibility — 18.3
Timeliness 0.0 12.6
Diversity 5.6 27.3
Innovation 64.5 28.9
Community Impact 22.9 9.7
Content Distribution 68.3 88.5
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (14)

2016
Community-Based Hip Fracture Rehabilitation Interventions for Older Adults With Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review
Paula M van Wyk;
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. e3-
500 views DOI Abstract
2018
Adapting the Wii Fit Balance Board to Enable Active Video Game Play by Wheelchair Users: User-Centered Design and Usability Evaluation
Laurie A Malone;
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. e2-
495 views DOI Abstract
2020
A Mobile App Directory of Occupational Therapists Who Provide Home Modifications: Development and Preliminary Usability Evaluation.
Nguyen, An Thi;Somerville, Emily Kling;Espín-Tello, Sandra Martina;Keglovits, Marian;Stark, Susan Lynn;
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. e14465
480 views DOI Abstract
2017
Technologies to Support Community-Dwelling Persons With Dementia: A Position Paper on Issues Regarding Development, Usability, Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness, Deployment, and Ethics.
Meiland, Franka;Innes, Anthea;Mountain, Gail;Robinson, Louise;van der Roest, Henriëtte;García-Casal, J Antonio;Gove, Dianne;Thyrian, Jochen René;Evans, Shirley;Dröes, Rose-Marie;Kelly, Fiona;Kurz, Alexander;Casey, Dympna;Szcześniak, Dorota;Dening, Tom;Craven, Michael P;Span, Marijke;Felzmann, Heike;Tsolaki, Magda;Franco-Martin, Manuel;
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. e1
448 views DOI Abstract
2021
Parents' Perspectives on a Computer Game–Assisted Rehabilitation Program for Manual Dexterity in Children With Cerebral Palsy: Qualitative Analysis of Expectations, Child Engagement, and Benefits
Nariman Sepehri;
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. e24337-
401 views DOI Abstract
2019
A Collaboration Between Game Developers and Rehabilitation Researchers to Develop a Web-Based App for Persons With Physical Disabilities: Case Study.
Terrill, Alexandra L;MacKenzie, Justin J;Reblin, Maija;Einerson, Jackie;Ferraro, Jesse;Altizer, Roger;
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. e13511
396 views DOI Abstract
2020
Therapist-guided telerehabilitation for adult cochlear implant users: Developmental and feasibility study.
Völter, Christiane;Schirmer, Christiane;Hinsen, Dorothee;Roeber, Marieke;Dazert, Stefan;Bilda, Kerstin;
378 views DOI Abstract
2019
Amputees' Attitudes Toward Participation in Amputee Support Groups and the Role of Virtual Technology in Supporting Amputees: Survey Study.
Nathan, Edward P;Winkler, Sandra L;
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 14887
364 views DOI Abstract
2021
Technology Acceptance and Usability of the BrainFx SCREEN in Canadian Military Members and Veterans With Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Mixed Methods UTAUT Study
Suzette Brémault-Phillips;
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. e26078-
307 views DOI Abstract
2020
An Internet-Based Consumer Resource for People with Low Back Pain (MyBackPain): Development and Evaluation
Mandy Nielsen;
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. e16101-
270 views DOI Abstract
2021
Parents' Perspectives on a Computer Game–Assisted Rehabilitation Program for Manual Dexterity in Children With Cerebral Palsy: Qualitative Analysis of Expectations, Child Engagement, and Benefits
Nariman Sepehri;
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. e24337-
401 views DOI Abstract
2021
Integrating Behavior of Children with Profound Intellectual, Multiple, or Severe Motor Disabilities With Location and Environment Data Sensors for Independent Communication and Mobility: App Development and Pilot Testing
Tatsuo Saeki;
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. e28020-
28 views DOI Abstract
2021
Adapting a Person’s Home in 3D Using a Mobile App (MapIt): Participatory Design Framework Investigating the App’s Acceptability
François Michaud;
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. e24669-
157 views DOI Abstract
2021
Technology Acceptance and Usability of the BrainFx SCREEN in Canadian Military Members and Veterans With Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Mixed Methods UTAUT Study
Suzette Brémault-Phillips;
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. e26078-
307 views DOI Abstract
2021
Feasibility of an Internet-Based Intervention to Promote Exercise for People With Spinal Cord Injury: Observational Pilot Study
Katherine Froehlich-Grobe;
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. e24276-
179 views DOI Abstract
2020
An Internet-Based Consumer Resource for People with Low Back Pain (MyBackPain): Development and Evaluation
Mandy Nielsen;
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. e16101-
270 views DOI Abstract
2020
Web-Based Consumer Health Education About Back Pain: Findings of Potential Tensions From a Photo-Elicitation and Observational Study
Paul Hodges;
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. e17130-
176 views DOI Abstract
2020
A Mobile App Directory of Occupational Therapists Who Provide Home Modifications: Development and Preliminary Usability Evaluation.
Nguyen, An Thi;Somerville, Emily Kling;Espín-Tello, Sandra Martina;Keglovits, Marian;Stark, Susan Lynn;
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. e14465
480 views DOI Abstract
2020
Therapist-guided telerehabilitation for adult cochlear implant users: Developmental and feasibility study.
Völter, Christiane;Schirmer, Christiane;Hinsen, Dorothee;Roeber, Marieke;Dazert, Stefan;Bilda, Kerstin;
378 views DOI Abstract
2019
A Collaboration Between Game Developers and Rehabilitation Researchers to Develop a Web-Based App for Persons With Physical Disabilities: Case Study.
Terrill, Alexandra L;MacKenzie, Justin J;Reblin, Maija;Einerson, Jackie;Ferraro, Jesse;Altizer, Roger;
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. e13511
396 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
32.0/100 · Poor
Ranked #17,380 of 29,330 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

32.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

64.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

22.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

68.3/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.