jmir mental health | Journament

Journal Ranking

#7554 / 33,973
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 4 days ago

jmir mental health

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi
Short Name jmir ment health
Abbreviated Name jmir ment health
ISSN 2368-7959
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (13 total)

2019
Public Opinions on Using Social Media Content to Identify Users With Depression and Target Mental Health Care Advertising: Mixed Methods Survey.
Ford, Elizabeth;Curlewis, Keegan;Wongkoblap, Akkapon;Curcin, Vasa;
Vol. 6 , No. 11 , pp. e12942
456 views DOI Abstract
2020
Involving End Users in Adapting a Spanish Version of a Web-Based Mental Health Clinic for Young People in Colombia: Exploratory Study Using Participatory Design Methodologies.
Ospina-Pinillos, Laura;Davenport, Tracey A;Navarro-Mancilla, Alvaro Andres;Cheng, Vanessa Wan Sze;Cardozo Alarcón, Andrés Camilo;Rangel, Andres M;Rueda-Jaimes, German Eduardo;Gomez-Restrepo, Carlos;Hickie, Ian B;
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. e15914
453 views DOI Abstract
2019
Digital Presence of a Research Center as a Research Dissemination Platform: Reach and Resources.
Lord, Sarah E;Seavey, Katherine M;Oren, Sonia D;Budney, Alan J;Marsch, Lisa A;
Vol. 6 , No. 4 , pp. e11686
417 views DOI Abstract
2019
Patient Privacy Perspectives on Health Information Exchange in a Mental Health Context: Qualitative Study.
Shen, Nelson;Sequeira, Lydia;Silver, Michelle Pannor;Carter-Langford, Abigail;Strauss, John;Wiljer, David;
Vol. 6 , No. 11 , pp. e13306
400 views DOI Abstract
2020
Digital Cognitive Behavior Therapy Intervention for Depression and Anxiety: Retrospective Study
Christopher Mosunic;
Vol. 7 , No. 8 , pp. e21304-
389 views DOI Abstract
2020
Combining Web-Based Attentional Bias Modification and Approach Bias Modification as a Self-Help Smoking Intervention for Adult Smokers Seeking Online Help: Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.
Wen, Si;Larsen, Helle;Boffo, Marilisa;Grasman, Raoul P P P;Pronk, Thomas;van Wijngaarden, Joeri B G;Wiers, Reinout W;
Vol. 7 , No. 5 , pp. e16342
353 views DOI Abstract
2020
Assessing the Usability, Appeal, and Impact of a Web-Based Training for Adults Responding to Concerning Posts on Social Media: Pilot Suicide Prevention Study.
Kerr, Bradley;Stephens, David;Pham, Daniel;Ghost Dog, Thomas;McCray, Celena;Caughlan, Colbie;Gaston, Amanda;Gritton, Jesse;Jenkins, Marina;Craig Rushing, Stephanie;Moreno, Megan A;
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. e14949
336 views DOI Abstract
2019
Evaluation of eMentalHealth.ca, a Canadian Mental Health Website Portal: Mixed Methods Assessment.
Jeong, Dahn;Cheng, Michael;St-Jean, Mireille;Jalali, Alireza;
Vol. 6 , No. 9 , pp. e13639
336 views DOI Abstract
2016
Finding Web-Based Anxiety Interventions on the World Wide Web: A Scoping Review.
Ashford, Miriam Thiel;Olander, Ellinor K;Ayers, Susan;
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. e14
258 views DOI Abstract
2021
Effects of Web-Based Group Mindfulness Training on Stress and Sleep Quality in Singapore During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Retrospective Equivalence Analysis
Eric Lim;
Vol. 8 , No. 3 , pp. e21757-
212 views DOI Abstract
View All 13 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.