Indexed in Journament

jmir mental health

ISSN 2368-7959· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
37.7/100
Journament Score
#10,264
Journament Rank
13
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name jmir ment health
Abbreviated Name jmir ment health
ISSN 2368-7959

Indexings

scopus ncbi

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (13)

2020
Involving End Users in Adapting a Spanish Version of a Web-Based Mental Health Clinic for Young People in Colombia: Exploratory Study Using Participatory Design Methodologies.
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. e15914
470 views DOI Abstract
2019
Public Opinions on Using Social Media Content to Identify Users With Depression and Target Mental Health Care Advertising: Mixed Methods Survey.
Vol. 6 , No. 11 , pp. e12942
469 views DOI Abstract
2019
Digital Presence of a Research Center as a Research Dissemination Platform: Reach and Resources.
Vol. 6 , No. 4 , pp. e11686
429 views DOI Abstract
2019
Patient Privacy Perspectives on Health Information Exchange in a Mental Health Context: Qualitative Study.
Vol. 6 , No. 11 , pp. e13306
414 views DOI Abstract
2020
Digital Cognitive Behavior Therapy Intervention for Depression and Anxiety: Retrospective Study
Vol. 7 , No. 8 , pp. e21304-
399 views DOI Abstract
2020
Combining Web-Based Attentional Bias Modification and Approach Bias Modification as a Self-Help Smoking Intervention for Adult Smokers Seeking Online Help: Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.
Vol. 7 , No. 5 , pp. e16342
366 views DOI Abstract
2019
Evaluation of eMentalHealth.ca, a Canadian Mental Health Website Portal: Mixed Methods Assessment.
Vol. 6 , No. 9 , pp. e13639
349 views DOI Abstract
2020
Assessing the Usability, Appeal, and Impact of a Web-Based Training for Adults Responding to Concerning Posts on Social Media: Pilot Suicide Prevention Study.
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. e14949
345 views DOI Abstract
2016
Finding Web-Based Anxiety Interventions on the World Wide Web: A Scoping Review.
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. e14
268 views DOI Abstract
2025
Game Design, Effectiveness, and Implementation of Serious Games Promoting Aspects of Mental Health Literacy Among Children and Adolescents: Systematic Review.
Vol. 12 , pp. e67418
70 views DOI Abstract
2020
Digital Cognitive Behavior Therapy Intervention for Depression and Anxiety: Retrospective Study
Vol. 7 , No. 8 , pp. e21304-
399 views DOI Abstract
2020
Combining Web-Based Attentional Bias Modification and Approach Bias Modification as a Self-Help Smoking Intervention for Adult Smokers Seeking Online Help: Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.
Vol. 7 , No. 5 , pp. e16342
366 views DOI Abstract
2020
Involving End Users in Adapting a Spanish Version of a Web-Based Mental Health Clinic for Young People in Colombia: Exploratory Study Using Participatory Design Methodologies.
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. e15914
470 views DOI Abstract
2020
Assessing the Usability, Appeal, and Impact of a Web-Based Training for Adults Responding to Concerning Posts on Social Media: Pilot Suicide Prevention Study.
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. e14949
345 views DOI Abstract
2019
Patient Privacy Perspectives on Health Information Exchange in a Mental Health Context: Qualitative Study.
Vol. 6 , No. 11 , pp. e13306
414 views DOI Abstract
2019
Public Opinions on Using Social Media Content to Identify Users With Depression and Target Mental Health Care Advertising: Mixed Methods Survey.
Vol. 6 , No. 11 , pp. e12942
469 views DOI Abstract
2019
Digital Presence of a Research Center as a Research Dissemination Platform: Reach and Resources.
Vol. 6 , No. 4 , pp. e11686
429 views DOI Abstract
38
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

37.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.