Frontiers in pharmacology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3 / 33,622
🥈 Very Good
Overall Score
78.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
65
Accessibility
95
Timeliness
60
Diversity
45
Innovation
68
Community Impact
70
Ethics & Transparency
75
Content Quality
72
Editorial Diversity
50
Publication Regularity
68
Geographic Reach
55
Updated 2 weeks ago

Frontiers in pharmacology

Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi doaj ulakbim sci
Short Name Front Pharmacol
Abbreviated Name front pharmacol
ISSN 1663-9812
Aim and Scope Open access publisher of peer-reviewed scientific articles across the entire spectrum of academia. Research network for academics to stay up-to-date with the latest scientific publications, events, blogs and news.
URL https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/pharmacology
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (309 total)

2018
Lignans From Forsythia x Intermedia Leaves and Flowers Attenuate the Pro-inflammatory Function of Leukocytes and Their Interaction With Endothelial Cells
Vol. 9 , pp. -
677 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effects of Tianshu Capsule on Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats as Revealed by H-NMR-Based Metabolic Profiling.
Vol. 10 , pp. 989
447 views DOI Abstract
2019
Medicinal Plants and Natural Products Used in Cataract Management.
Vol. 10 , pp. 466
424 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effect of Grape Pomace Polyphenols With or Without Pectin on TMAO Serum Levels Assessed by LC/MS-Based Assay: A Preliminary Clinical Study on Overweight/Obese Subjects.
Vol. 10 , pp. 575
422 views DOI Abstract
2019
Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants for Secondary Prevention of Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Prospective Cohort Studies.
Vol. 10 , pp. 773
408 views DOI Abstract
2019
Combined and Extracts (WS 1541) Exert Anti-proliferative and Anti-inflammatory Effects in a Mouse Model of Benign Prostate Hyperplasia.
Vol. 10 , pp. 311
381 views DOI Abstract
2020
Knowledge Mapping of (Danggui) Research: A Scientometric Study.
Vol. 11 , pp. 294
375 views DOI Abstract
2019
Editorial: Ethnopharmacology in Central and Eastern Europe in the Context of Global Research Developments.
Vol. 10 , pp. 341
343 views DOI
2010
colon mucinous adenocarcinoma in childhood: a case report with emphasis on image findings
Vol. 2010 , pp. -
335 views DOI Abstract
78
Overall
Very Good
65
95
45
68
70
60
75
72
50
68
55

Overall Quality Score

78.0/100

Tier: Very Good

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

65.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

95.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

45.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

Estimated 20 countries represented

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

68.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

70.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

60.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

75.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

72.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

50.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

68.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

55.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Estimated 20 countries represented

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.