Indexed in Journament

Frontiers in pharmacology

ISSN 1663-9812· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
50.4 / 100
Journament Score
Average
Ranked #55 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
309 Articles
Scores higher than 99.8% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →
AI Quality Analysis
65.8 / 100
Separate paid analysis — does not affect the Journament Score or ranking.

About This Journal

Open access publisher of peer-reviewed scientific articles across the entire spectrum of academia. Research network for academics to stay up-to-date with the latest scientific publications, events, blogs and news.
Short Name Front Pharmacol
Abbreviated Name front pharmacol
ISSN 1663-9812
URL https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/pharmacology

Quality Profile

12 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing
Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.3 30.4
Accessibility 35.0 20.4
Timeliness 60.0 5.8
Diversity 83.1 24.4
Innovation 70.0 25.7
Community Impact 14.3 5.8
Content Distribution 52.4 88.6
Content Quality 72.0 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 75.0 40.2
Editorial Standards 50.0 33.4
Publication Regularity 68.0 53.2
Geographic Reach 55.0 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (309)

2018
Lignans From Forsythia x Intermedia Leaves and Flowers Attenuate the Pro-inflammatory Function of Leukocytes and Their Interaction With Endothelial Cells
Michalak, Barbara;Filipek, Agnieszka;Chomicki, Piotr;Pyza, Małgorzata;Woźniak, Marta;Żyżyńska-Granica, Barbara;Piwowarski, Jakub P.;Kicel, Agnieszka;Olszewska, Monika A.;Kiss, Anna K.;
Vol. 9 , pp. -
825 views DOI Abstract
2018
Phytochemical Characterization of L. Under Differential Dried-Conditions and Associated Nephrotoxicity Screening of Main Compound With Organ-on-a-Chip.
Li, Xian;Tian, Tian;
Vol. 9 , pp. 1067
630 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effects of Tianshu Capsule on Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats as Revealed by H-NMR-Based Metabolic Profiling.
Gao, Jian;Wang, Tieshan;Wang, Chao;Wang, Shuai;Wang, Wei;Ma, Di;Li, Yongbiao;Zhao, Haibin;Chen, Jianxin;
Vol. 10 , pp. 989
593 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effect of Grape Pomace Polyphenols With or Without Pectin on TMAO Serum Levels Assessed by LC/MS-Based Assay: A Preliminary Clinical Study on Overweight/Obese Subjects.
Annunziata, Giuseppe;Maisto, Maria;Schisano, Connie;Ciampaglia, Roberto;Narciso, Viviana;Hassan, Sherif T S;Tenore, Gian Carlo;Novellino, Ettore;
Vol. 10 , pp. 575
561 views DOI Abstract
2019
Medicinal Plants and Natural Products Used in Cataract Management.
Tewari, Devesh;Samoilă, Ovidiu;Gocan, Diana;Mocan, Andrei;Moldovan, Cadmiel;Devkota, Hari Prasad;Atanasov, Atanas G;Zengin, Gokhan;Echeverría, Javier;Vodnar, Dan;Szabo, Bianca;Crişan, Gianina;
Vol. 10 , pp. 466
560 views DOI Abstract
2019
Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants for Secondary Prevention of Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Prospective Cohort Studies.
Wang, Yunsong;Lv, Haichen;Li, Daobo;Chen, Cheng;Gu, Guangming;Sun, Yang;Yang, Xiaolei;Liu, Ying;Fang, Fengqi;Liu, Jiwei;Tse, Gary;Xia, Yunlong;
Vol. 10 , pp. 773
536 views DOI Abstract
2020
Knowledge Mapping of (Danggui) Research: A Scientometric Study.
Lu, Cuncun;Liu, Ming;Shang, Wenru;Yuan, Yuan;Li, Meixuan;Deng, Xiuxiu;Li, Huijuan;Yang, Kehu;
Vol. 11 , pp. 294
535 views DOI Abstract
2019
Combined and Extracts (WS 1541) Exert Anti-proliferative and Anti-inflammatory Effects in a Mouse Model of Benign Prostate Hyperplasia.
Pigat, Natascha;Reyes-Gomez, Edouard;Boutillon, Florence;Palea, Stefano;Barry Delongchamps, Nicolas;Koch, Egon;Goffin, Vincent;
Vol. 10 , pp. 311
508 views DOI Abstract
2010
colon mucinous adenocarcinoma in childhood: a case report with emphasis on image findings
;Antonio Muccillo;Edson Marchiori;Cláudia Renata Penna;Regina Rodrigues Guimarães;Gláucia Zanetti;Guilherme Abdalla;Nina Ventura;Carolina Lamas Constantino;Mariana Leite Pereira;Viviane Brandão;Pedro Martins;Rodrigo Canellas;Romulo Varella de Oliveira
Vol. 2010 , pp. -
487 views DOI Abstract
2019
Editorial: Ethnopharmacology in Central and Eastern Europe in the Context of Global Research Developments.
Tewari, Devesh;Hohmann, Judit;Kiss, Anna K;Rollinger, Judith M;Atanasov, Atanas G;
Vol. 10 , pp. 341
473 views DOI
2025
Editorial: Diverse functions of drug transporters
Prasad, Bhagwat
Vol. 16 , pp. 1697775-
40 views DOI Abstract
2025
A phase I study of HEC73543, an oral FLT3 inhibitor: the effect of food on pharmacokinetics after oral dosing in healthy Chinese volunteers
Ding, Yanhua
Vol. 16 , pp. 1636504-
55 views DOI Abstract
2025
Forced intensity-controlled endurance training on a small-animal treadmill machine inducing murine cardiac hypertrophy: insights and comparison to voluntary running models
Weckbach, Ludwig T.
Vol. 16 , pp. 1682751-
35 views DOI Abstract
2025
Cost-effectiveness analysis of cabozantinib plus atezolizumab for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
Xia, Tong-Xia
Vol. 16 , pp. 1556304-
47 views DOI Abstract
2025
Digital interventions in medication adherence: a narrative review of current evidence and challenges
Walsh, Jane
Vol. 16 , pp. 1632474-
43 views DOI Abstract
2025
Pharmacologic treatment of fibromyalgia: an update
Jiao, Juan
Vol. 16 , pp. 1651181-
36 views DOI Abstract
2025
The efficacy and safety of low-intensity focused ultrasound pulses on prolonged disorders of consciousness: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial
36 views DOI
2025
Safeguarding the polar regions from dangerous geoengineering: a critical assessment of proposed concepts and future prospects
Truffer, Martin
Vol. 3 , pp. 1527393-
37 views DOI Abstract
2025
Harnessing agri-food system microbiomes for sustainability and human health
Cotter, Paul D.
Vol. 3 , pp. 1575468-
45 views DOI Abstract
2025
Advances in Traditional Chinese Medicine for Burn Treatment: Mechanisms, Therapeutic Approaches, and Innovative Preparations
41 views DOI
Journament Score
50.4/100 · Average
Ranked #55 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis 65.8/100
Journament

Overall Quality Score

50.4/100

Tier: Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

83.1/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

Estimated 20 countries represented

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

14.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

60.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

52.4/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

75.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

72.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

50.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

68.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

55.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Estimated 20 countries represented

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.