Indexed in Journament

journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the international association for the study of lung cancer

ISSN 1556-1380· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
35.6 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #7,384 of 29,297 scored journals (34,015 indexed)
10 Articles
Scores higher than 74.7% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name j thorac oncol
Abbreviated Name j thorac oncol
ISSN 1556-1380

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 31.5
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 34.5
Community Impact 9.3
Content Distribution 93.4
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the international association for the study of lung cancer
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.5 30.4
Accessibility — 23.1
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity — 26.3
Innovation 34.5 24.1
Community Impact 9.3 4.3
Content Distribution 93.4 89.2
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (10)

2019
Spatial and temporal heterogeneity of panel-based tumor mutational burden (TMB) in pulmonary adenocarcinoma: separating biology from technical artifacts.
493 views DOI Abstract
2019
Radiologic Considerations And Standardization Of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (MPM) Imaging Within Clinical Trials: Consensus Statement From The NCI Thoracic Malignancy Steering Committee - International Association For The Study Of Lung Cancer - Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation Clinical Trials Planning Meeting.
463 views DOI Abstract
2020
F-FDG uptake in Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) patient, referred to PET/CT for Non-Small Cells Lung Cancer restaging.
452 views DOI
2019
Asian Thoracic Oncology Research Group expert consensus statement on optimal management of stage III non-small cell lung cancer.
433 views DOI Abstract
2020
COVID-19 or Lung Cancer: what should we treat?
423 views DOI
2020
COVID-19 in the perioperative period of lung resection: a brief report from a single thoracic surgery department in Wuhan, China.
411 views DOI Abstract
2020
Early appearance of COVID-19 associated pulmonary infiltrates during daily radiotherapy imaging for lung cancer.
396 views DOI
2020
LUNG CANCER SURGICAL MANAGEMENT DURING THE OUTBREAK OF COVID-19.
392 views DOI
2019
Impact of Specimen Characteristics on PD-L1 Testing in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Validation of the IASLC PD-L1 Testing Guidelines.
378 views DOI Abstract
2020
A rapid fatal evolution of Coronavirus Disease-19 (COVID-19) in an advanced lung cancer patient with a long time response to nivolumab.
376 views DOI
2020
COVID-19 in the perioperative period of lung resection: a brief report from a single thoracic surgery department in Wuhan, China.
411 views DOI Abstract
2020
LUNG CANCER SURGICAL MANAGEMENT DURING THE OUTBREAK OF COVID-19.
392 views DOI
2020
COVID-19 or Lung Cancer: what should we treat?
423 views DOI
2020
Early appearance of COVID-19 associated pulmonary infiltrates during daily radiotherapy imaging for lung cancer.
396 views DOI
2020
A rapid fatal evolution of Coronavirus Disease-19 (COVID-19) in an advanced lung cancer patient with a long time response to nivolumab.
376 views DOI
2020
F-FDG uptake in Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) patient, referred to PET/CT for Non-Small Cells Lung Cancer restaging.
452 views DOI
2019
Asian Thoracic Oncology Research Group expert consensus statement on optimal management of stage III non-small cell lung cancer.
433 views DOI Abstract
2019
Impact of Specimen Characteristics on PD-L1 Testing in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Validation of the IASLC PD-L1 Testing Guidelines.
378 views DOI Abstract
2019
Spatial and temporal heterogeneity of panel-based tumor mutational burden (TMB) in pulmonary adenocarcinoma: separating biology from technical artifacts.
493 views DOI Abstract
2019
Radiologic Considerations And Standardization Of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (MPM) Imaging Within Clinical Trials: Consensus Statement From The NCI Thoracic Malignancy Steering Committee - International Association For The Study Of Lung Cancer - Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation Clinical Trials Planning Meeting.
463 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
35.6/100 · Poor
Ranked #7,384 of 29,297 scored
(34,015 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

35.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

34.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

9.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

93.4/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.