Indexed in Journament

micro and nano systems letters

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
32.6 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #14,120 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
28 Articles
Scores higher than 51.8% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name micro and nano systems letters
Abbreviated Name micro and nano systems letters

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 31.0
Timeliness 0.0
Diversity 5.6
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 5.0
Content Distribution 79.6
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for micro and nano systems letters
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.0 30.4
Accessibility 20.4
Timeliness 0.0 5.8
Diversity 5.6 24.4
Innovation 70.0 25.7
Community Impact 5.0 5.8
Content Distribution 79.6 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (28)

2014
safety and potential risks of prolonged use of proton pump inhibitors
Vol. 48 , No. 1.51 , pp. 102-109
359 views DOI Abstract
2017
population changes of colon lumen microbiota in patients with chronic hepatitis c
Vol. 51 , No. 2 , pp. 121-126
339 views DOI Abstract
2017
development of a non-invasive model to improve the accuracy of determining liver fibrosis stage in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
Vol. 51 , No. 4 , pp. 256-271
314 views DOI Abstract
2015
essential phospholipids in the treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
Vol. 49 , No. 4.58 , pp. 69-73
305 views DOI Abstract
2016
the state of pancreatobiliary system and intestinal microflora in children with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
Vol. 50 , No. 4.62 , pp. 37-42
290 views DOI Abstract
2017
state of igg4-positive plasma cells in the colon mucosa of chronic inflammatory bowel disease
Vol. 51 , No. 2 , pp. 111-114
287 views DOI Abstract
2016
the experience of using parenteral nutrition in the treatment of liver insufficiency
Vol. 50 , No. 1.59 , pp. 53-57
278 views DOI Abstract
2015
diagnostic value of 200-minute postprandial esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance-ph-monitoring in comparison with 24-hour variant
Vol. 49 , No. 2.56 , pp. 5-11
272 views DOI Abstract
2013
editor-in-Сhief’s opening remarks
Vol. 47 , No. 1.47 , pp. -
268 views DOI Abstract
2017
development of a non-invasive model to improve the accuracy of determining liver fibrosis stage in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
Vol. 51 , No. 4 , pp. 256-271
314 views DOI Abstract
2017
katerynoslav doctors with german origin
Vol. 51 , No. 3 , pp. 222-228
187 views DOI Abstract
2017
population changes of colon lumen microbiota in patients with chronic hepatitis c
Vol. 51 , No. 2 , pp. 121-126
339 views DOI Abstract
2017
state of igg4-positive plasma cells in the colon mucosa of chronic inflammatory bowel disease
Vol. 51 , No. 2 , pp. 111-114
287 views DOI Abstract
2017
past, present and future of surgical treatment of peptic ulcer (50-year experience of the institute)
Vol. 51 , No. 4 , pp. 281-286
220 views DOI Abstract
2016
the experience of using parenteral nutrition in the treatment of liver insufficiency
Vol. 50 , No. 1.59 , pp. 53-57
278 views DOI Abstract
2016
application of 5-aminosalicylic acid preparations in the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases
Vol. 50 , No. 3.61 , pp. 80-87
225 views DOI Abstract
2016
gastroesophageal reflux disease and alkaline reflux: the mechanisms of the development and therapeutic approach
Vol. 50 , No. 4.62 , pp. 21-25
226 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
32.6/100 · Poor
Ranked #14,120 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

32.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

79.6/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.