Indexed in Journament

micro and nano systems letters

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
40.4/100
Journament Score
#6,809
Journament Rank
28
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name micro and nano systems letters
Abbreviated Name micro and nano systems letters

Indexings

scopus

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (28)

2014
safety and potential risks of prolonged use of proton pump inhibitors
Vol. 48 , No. 1.51 , pp. 102-109
332 views DOI Abstract
2017
population changes of colon lumen microbiota in patients with chronic hepatitis c
Vol. 51 , No. 2 , pp. 121-126
311 views DOI Abstract
2017
development of a non-invasive model to improve the accuracy of determining liver fibrosis stage in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
Vol. 51 , No. 4 , pp. 256-271
290 views DOI Abstract
2015
essential phospholipids in the treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
Vol. 49 , No. 4.58 , pp. 69-73
274 views DOI Abstract
2017
state of igg4-positive plasma cells in the colon mucosa of chronic inflammatory bowel disease
Vol. 51 , No. 2 , pp. 111-114
273 views DOI Abstract
2016
the state of pancreatobiliary system and intestinal microflora in children with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
Vol. 50 , No. 4.62 , pp. 37-42
254 views DOI Abstract
2013
editor-in-Сhief’s opening remarks
Vol. 47 , No. 1.47 , pp. -
250 views DOI Abstract
2015
diagnostic value of 200-minute postprandial esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance-ph-monitoring in comparison with 24-hour variant
Vol. 49 , No. 2.56 , pp. 5-11
241 views DOI Abstract
2017
development of a non-invasive model to improve the accuracy of determining liver fibrosis stage in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
Vol. 51 , No. 4 , pp. 256-271
290 views DOI Abstract
2017
katerynoslav doctors with german origin
Vol. 51 , No. 3 , pp. 222-228
164 views DOI Abstract
2017
population changes of colon lumen microbiota in patients with chronic hepatitis c
Vol. 51 , No. 2 , pp. 121-126
311 views DOI Abstract
2017
state of igg4-positive plasma cells in the colon mucosa of chronic inflammatory bowel disease
Vol. 51 , No. 2 , pp. 111-114
273 views DOI Abstract
2017
past, present and future of surgical treatment of peptic ulcer (50-year experience of the institute)
Vol. 51 , No. 4 , pp. 281-286
181 views DOI Abstract
2016
the experience of using parenteral nutrition in the treatment of liver insufficiency
Vol. 50 , No. 1.59 , pp. 53-57
234 views DOI Abstract
2016
application of 5-aminosalicylic acid preparations in the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases
Vol. 50 , No. 3.61 , pp. 80-87
199 views DOI Abstract
2016
gastroesophageal reflux disease and alkaline reflux: the mechanisms of the development and therapeutic approach
Vol. 50 , No. 4.62 , pp. 21-25
197 views DOI Abstract
40
Overall
Below Average
30
15
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

40.4/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

32.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.