Indexed in Journament

khirurgiia

ISSN 0023-1207· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
23.6 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #27,689 of 29,298 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
41 Articles
Scores higher than 5.4% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name khirurgiia (mosk)
Abbreviated Name khirurgiia (mosk)
ISSN 0023-1207
URL https://www.medscape.com/viewpublication/7231

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for khirurgiia
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 22.5
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 5.6 22.7
Innovation 12.0 24.1
Community Impact 6.4 4.2
Content Distribution 81.9 88.7
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (41)

2016
amenizaÇÃo de estresse tÉrmico via aplicaÇÃo de bioestimulante em sementes de meloeiro cantaloupe / thermal stress alleviation by biostimulant application on cantaloupe melon seeds
Vol. 10 , No. 3 , pp. 241-247
347 views DOI Abstract
2017
avaliaÇÃo do consumo de combustÍvel de um conjunto motomecanizado no manejo de plantas daninhas na cultura da acerola (malpighia ermaginata) em cultivo orgÂnico
Vol. 11 , No. 3 , pp. 239-246
344 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Intensification of the organism detoxification ability under surgical endogenous intoxication].
, No. 6 , pp. 73-79
307 views DOI Abstract
2016
uso da laranja lima e seus resÍduos no desenvolvimento de novos produtos / use of ‘lime’ orange and their wastes in the development of new products
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 69-96
300 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Estimation of the place of the Russian Federation in the world publication activity ranking on priority trends in biomedicine].
, No. 5 , pp. 120-127
293 views DOI Abstract
2017
doses de extrato de prÓpolis no controle do fungo aspergillus sp e no tratamento de sementes de pepino / extract of propolis in the treatment of cucumber seeds and control of aspergillus sp
Vol. 11 , No. 4 , pp. 360-364
270 views DOI Abstract
2001
[Current principles of the use of laparoscopic surgery in gastroduodenal ulcer].
, No. 6 , pp. 12-7
270 views Abstract
2019
[Estimation of the place of the Russian Federation in the world publication activity ranking on priority trends in biomedicine].
, No. 5 , pp. 120-127
293 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Intensification of the organism detoxification ability under surgical endogenous intoxication].
, No. 6 , pp. 73-79
307 views DOI Abstract
2017
seguranÇa do trabalho em unidades de beneficiamento de produtos olerÍcolas / work safety in agricultural packing houses
Vol. 11 , No. 2 , pp. 206-216
161 views DOI Abstract
2017
utilizaÇÃo da bucha vegetal de curcubitÁcea como material suporte em reator anaerÓbio de leito fixo / use of cucurbitaceous bush as support material in anaerobic fixed bed reactor
Vol. 11 , No. 2 , pp. 142-153
237 views DOI Abstract
2017
doses de extrato de prÓpolis no controle do fungo aspergillus sp e no tratamento de sementes de pepino / extract of propolis in the treatment of cucumber seeds and control of aspergillus sp
Vol. 11 , No. 4 , pp. 360-364
270 views DOI Abstract
2017
avaliaÇÃo do consumo de combustÍvel de um conjunto motomecanizado no manejo de plantas daninhas na cultura da acerola (malpighia ermaginata) em cultivo orgÂnico
Vol. 11 , No. 3 , pp. 239-246
344 views DOI Abstract
2016
amenizaÇÃo de estresse tÉrmico via aplicaÇÃo de bioestimulante em sementes de meloeiro cantaloupe / thermal stress alleviation by biostimulant application on cantaloupe melon seeds
Vol. 10 , No. 3 , pp. 241-247
347 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
23.6/100 · Poor
Ranked #27,689 of 29,298 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

23.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

12.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

6.4/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

81.9/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.