Indexed in Journament

journal of human kinetics

ISSN 1640-5544· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
41.2 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #1,693 of 29,297 scored journals (34,027 indexed)
6 Articles
Scores higher than 94.2% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name j hum kinet
Abbreviated Name journal of human kinetics
ISSN 1640-5544

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 31.0
Timeliness 0.0
Diversity 65.6
Innovation 36.0
Community Impact 10.0
Content Distribution 92.7
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.0 30.5
Accessibility — 23.0
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 65.6 25.9
Innovation 36.0 24.1
Community Impact 10.0 5.7
Content Distribution 92.7 89.4
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (6)

2016
Does the MTHFR A1298C Polymorphism Modulate the Cardiorespiratory Response to Training?
Paweł, Cięszczyk;Aleksandra, Zarębska;Zbigniew, Jastrzębski;Michał, Sawczyn;Izabela, Kozakiewicz-Drobnik;Agata, Leońska-Duniec;Mariusz, Kaczmarczyk;Agnieszka, Maciejewska-Skrendo;Piotr, Żmijewski;Grzegorz, Trybek;Wojciech, Smółka;Jan, Pilch;Katarzyna, Leźnicka;Ewelina, Lulińska-Kuklik;Marek, Sawczuk;Myosotis, Massidda;
Vol. 54 , No. 1 , pp. 43-53
486 views Abstract
2019
Sloppy, But Acceptable, Control of Biological Movement: Algorithm-Based Stabilization of Subspaces in Abundant Spaces.
Akulin, Vladimir M;Carlier, Frederic;Solnik, Stanislaw;Latash, Mark L;
Vol. 67 , pp. 49-72
392 views DOI Abstract
2019
Drive for Muscularity and Disordered Eating Behavior in Males: The Mediating Role of Cognitive Appraisal.
Gomes, A Rui;Simães, Clara;Dias, Olga;Almeida, Catarina;Gonçalves, Sónia;
Vol. 70 , pp. 287-295
388 views DOI Abstract
2019
Perceived Training Load, Muscle Soreness, Stress, Fatigue, and Sleep Quality in Professional Basketball: A Full Season Study
Clemente, F.
Vol. 67 , pp. 199-207
385 views DOI
2019
A Comparison between the Recovery Responses Following an Eccentrically Loaded Bench Press Protocol Vs. Regular Loading in Highly Trained Men.
Bartolomei, Sandro;Totti, Valentina;Nigro, Federico;Ciacci, Simone;Semprini, Gabriele;Michele, Rocco Di;Cortesi, Matteo;Hoffman, Jay R;
Vol. 68 , pp. 59-67
377 views DOI Abstract
2019
Genetic Markers Associated with Power Athlete Status.
Maciejewska-Skrendo, Agnieszka;Cięszczyk, Paweł;Chycki, Jakub;Sawczuk, Marek;Smółka, Wojciech;
Vol. 68 , pp. 17-36
355 views DOI Abstract
2019
Drive for Muscularity and Disordered Eating Behavior in Males: The Mediating Role of Cognitive Appraisal.
Gomes, A Rui;Simães, Clara;Dias, Olga;Almeida, Catarina;Gonçalves, Sónia;
Vol. 70 , pp. 287-295
388 views DOI Abstract
2019
Genetic Markers Associated with Power Athlete Status.
Maciejewska-Skrendo, Agnieszka;Cięszczyk, Paweł;Chycki, Jakub;Sawczuk, Marek;Smółka, Wojciech;
Vol. 68 , pp. 17-36
355 views DOI Abstract
2019
A Comparison between the Recovery Responses Following an Eccentrically Loaded Bench Press Protocol Vs. Regular Loading in Highly Trained Men.
Bartolomei, Sandro;Totti, Valentina;Nigro, Federico;Ciacci, Simone;Semprini, Gabriele;Michele, Rocco Di;Cortesi, Matteo;Hoffman, Jay R;
Vol. 68 , pp. 59-67
377 views DOI Abstract
2019
Sloppy, But Acceptable, Control of Biological Movement: Algorithm-Based Stabilization of Subspaces in Abundant Spaces.
Akulin, Vladimir M;Carlier, Frederic;Solnik, Stanislaw;Latash, Mark L;
Vol. 67 , pp. 49-72
392 views DOI Abstract
2019
Perceived Training Load, Muscle Soreness, Stress, Fatigue, and Sleep Quality in Professional Basketball: A Full Season Study
Clemente, F.
Vol. 67 , pp. 199-207
385 views DOI
2016
Does the MTHFR A1298C Polymorphism Modulate the Cardiorespiratory Response to Training?
Paweł, Cięszczyk;Aleksandra, Zarębska;Zbigniew, Jastrzębski;Michał, Sawczyn;Izabela, Kozakiewicz-Drobnik;Agata, Leońska-Duniec;Mariusz, Kaczmarczyk;Agnieszka, Maciejewska-Skrendo;Piotr, Żmijewski;Grzegorz, Trybek;Wojciech, Smółka;Jan, Pilch;Katarzyna, Leźnicka;Ewelina, Lulińska-Kuklik;Marek, Sawczuk;Myosotis, Massidda;
Vol. 54 , No. 1 , pp. 43-53
486 views Abstract
Journament Score
41.2/100 · Below Average
Ranked #1,693 of 29,297 scored
(34,027 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.2/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

65.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

36.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

92.7/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.