Indexed in Journament

proceedings of indian national science academy

ISSN 2454-9983· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
30.0 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #18,010 of 29,298 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
27 Articles
Scores higher than 38.5% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name proceedings of indian national science academy
Abbreviated Name proceedings of indian national science academy
ISSN 2454-9983
URL http://insa.nic.in/UI/Archivesection.aspx

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.6
Accessibility 20.0
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 55.5
Community Impact 7.9
Content Distribution 58.6
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for proceedings of indian national science academy
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 22.5
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 22.7
Innovation 55.5 24.1
Community Impact 7.9 4.2
Content Distribution 58.6 88.7
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (27)

2015
QUATERNION VALUED FUNCTION OF A REAL VARIABLE SERRET-FRENET FORMULAE
Vol. 18 , No. 6 , pp. -
764 views Abstract
2015
percepções de docentes e discentes sobre uso educativo de mídias sociais
Vol. 40 , No. 3 , pp. -
439 views DOI Abstract
2014
associação entre prática religiosa e estilo de vida saudável em escolares de pelotas, rs
Vol. 39 , No. 2 , pp. -
397 views DOI Abstract
2015
Phospholopid Organisation: Hydrophobic Channels in Biological Membranes
Vol. 45 , No. 6A , pp. -
382 views Abstract
2014
use of psychoactive substances in students at a public university
Vol. 39 , No. 3 , pp. -
371 views DOI Abstract
2015
Biological Indicators of Pollution
Vol. 44 , No. 2B , pp. -
364 views Abstract
2015
residência multiprofissional em saúde: tem valido a pena?
Vol. 40 , No. 3 , pp. -
345 views DOI Abstract
2017
conhecimento dos acadêmicos e profissionais da fisioterapia sobre dor: uma revisão sistemática
Vol. 42 , No. 2 , pp. -
338 views DOI Abstract
2015
EFFECT OF THERMAL DIFFUSION ON THERMOHALINE INTERLEAVING IN A POROUS MEDIUM DUE TO HORIZONTAL GRADIENTS
Vol. 20 , No. 7 , pp. -
321 views Abstract
2018
percepção de pessoas submetidas ao transplante renal sobre a doação de órgãos
Vol. 43 , No. 1 , pp. -
205 views DOI Abstract
2018
queixas técnicas e reações adversas a medicamentos notificadas em um hospital regional (brasil): um estudo transversal
Vol. 43 , No. 1 , pp. -
86 views DOI Abstract
2017
2017
conhecimento dos acadêmicos e profissionais da fisioterapia sobre dor: uma revisão sistemática
Vol. 42 , No. 2 , pp. -
338 views DOI Abstract
2017
importância clínica do músculo esternal e suas variações anatômicas: uma revisão sistemática da literatura
Vol. 42 , No. 2 , pp. -
98 views DOI Abstract
2016
agradecimento aos revisores
Vol. 41 , No. 1 , pp. -
33 views DOI Abstract
2016
hidroterapia no equilíbrio dinâmico e nas atividades de vida diária de pacientes com neurotoxoplasmose associada à síndrome da imunodeficiência adquirida
Vol. 41 , No. 1 , pp. -
213 views DOI Abstract
2016
análise da confiabilidade e concordância dos métodos paquímetro e polpas digitais na mensuração da diástase do músculo reto abdominal
Vol. 41 , No. 3 , pp. -
168 views DOI Abstract
2016
impacto do diabetes mellitus gestacional sobre a massa placentária humana
Vol. 41 , No. 1 , pp. -
225 views DOI Abstract
2015
perfil de recém-nascidos pré-termo internados na unidade de terapia intensiva de hospital de alta complexidade
Vol. 40 , No. 1 , pp. -
150 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
30.0/100 · Poor
Ranked #18,010 of 29,298 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

30.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

55.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

58.6/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.