journal of sports medicine and physical fitness | Journament

Journal Ranking

#8433 / 33,973
📉 Poor
Overall Score
34.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
32
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 days ago

journal of sports medicine and physical fitness

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ulakbim
Short Name journal of sports medicine and physical fitness
Abbreviated Name journal of sports medicine and physical fitness
ISSN 0022-4707
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (27 total)

2013
atrophic vulvovaginitis: new trends in pharmacotherapy
;V N Prilepskaya;A V Ledina
Vol. 15 , No. 6 , pp. 54-56
261 views Abstract
2010
referat: o vozmozhnostyakh primeneniyau podrostkov kombinirovannykh oral'nykhprotivozachatochnykh preparatovs antiandrogennymi svoystvami
;I V Kuznetsova
Vol. 12 , No. 4 , pp. 28-31
256 views
2019
Tissue flossing: A new short-term compression therapy for reducing exercise-induced delayed-onset muscle soreness A randomized, controlled and double-blind pilot crossover trial
Prill, R.
Vol. 59 , pp. 861-867
251 views DOI
2019
cancer risks and benefits of hormonal contraception: a literature review and practical issues
;Antonina V Ledina;Liubov' I Korolenkova;Evgenii V Ledin
Vol. 21 , No. 1 , pp. 75-79
243 views DOI Abstract
2016
the results of the russian non-interventional (observational) data monitoring program for the drug recommendation and prevention of hypovitaminosis and mineral deficiency «prognostic» in pregnant women
;V N Prilepskaya;F R Kutueva;V M Kuleshov;M D Andreeva;L V Tkachenko;T D Zaitseva;T A Pogodina
Vol. 18 , No. 4 , pp. 5-12
214 views Abstract
2018
to the question about diagnostics, prevention and therapy of pathology of the cervix
;S O Dubrovina;O A Ardintseva;L V Krasilnikova;M V Varicheva;O A Afrikyan
Vol. 20 , No. 5 , pp. 33-36
206 views DOI Abstract
2018
menopausal hormone treatments and risk of cardiovascular diseases: modern view
;I A Ilovayskaya
Vol. 20 , No. 4 , pp. 40-43
202 views DOI Abstract
2015
optimization of the treatment of patients with proliferative diseases of the uterus
;I A Lapina;N I Nasyrova
Vol. 17 , No. 4 , pp. 27-31
189 views Abstract
2007
rol' ksenikala pri kompleksnom lechenii prostoy giperplazii endometriya u zhenshchin reproduktivnogo vozrasta, stradayushchikh ozhireniem
;D O Santa-Mariya Fernandes;I V Kuznetsova
Vol. 9 , No. 2 , pp. 23-27
182 views Abstract
2015
evaluation of menopausal disorders in women with different levels of bone mineral density
;I S Zakharov
Vol. 17 , No. 6 , pp. 14-16
180 views Abstract
View All 27 Articles
34
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
32
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

34.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

32.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.