Indexed in Journament

European journal of applied physiology

ISSN 1439-6327· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
50.0 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #75 of 29,298 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
16 Articles
Scores higher than 99.7% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Eur J Appl Physiol
Abbreviated Name eur j appl physiol
ISSN 1439-6327

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.7
Timeliness 20.0
Diversity 80.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 9.3
Content Distribution 80.3
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for European journal of applied physiology
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.7 30.4
Accessibility 22.5
Timeliness 20.0 3.0
Diversity 80.0 22.7
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 9.3 4.2
Content Distribution 80.3 88.7
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (16)

2019
Peripheral fatigue: new mechanistic insights from recent technologies.
404 views DOI Abstract
2017
The metabolic costs of walking and running up a 30-degree incline: implications for vertical kilometer foot races.
Vol. 117 , No. 9 , pp. 1869-1876
402 views DOI Abstract
2019
Is the joint-angle specificity of isometric resistance training real? And if so, does it have a neural basis?
375 views DOI Abstract
2020
Age differences in cardiac autonomic regulation during intermittent exercise in the heat.
368 views DOI Abstract
2020
Influence of aerobic fitness on gastrointestinal barrier integrity and microbial translocation following a fixed-intensity military exertional heat stress test.
Vol. 120 , No. 10 , pp. 2325-2337
365 views DOI Abstract
2019
Changes in oxidative stress, inflammation and muscle damage markers following eccentric versus concentric cycling in older adults.
357 views DOI Abstract
2018
The effectiveness of bench press training with or without throws on strength and shot put distance of competitive university athletes.
Vol. 118 , No. 9 , pp. 1821-1830
349 views DOI Abstract
2019
Treadmill running using an RPE-clamp model: mediators of perception and implications for exercise prescription.
Vol. 119 , No. 9 , pp. 2083-2094
344 views DOI Abstract
2020
Alterations in energy system contribution following upper body sprint interval training.
331 views DOI Abstract
2024
Hypoxia matters: comparison of external and internal training load markers during an 8-week resistance training program in normoxia, normobaric hypoxia and hypobaric hypoxia.
132 views DOI Abstract
2020
Influence of aerobic fitness on gastrointestinal barrier integrity and microbial translocation following a fixed-intensity military exertional heat stress test.
Vol. 120 , No. 10 , pp. 2325-2337
365 views DOI Abstract
2020
Does α-adrenergic receptor blockade modulate sweating during incremental exercise in young endurance-trained men?
295 views DOI Abstract
2020
Alterations in energy system contribution following upper body sprint interval training.
331 views DOI Abstract
2020
Reliability and validity of methods in the assessment of cold-induced shivering thermogenesis.
329 views DOI Abstract
2020
Age differences in cardiac autonomic regulation during intermittent exercise in the heat.
368 views DOI Abstract
2019
Peripheral fatigue: new mechanistic insights from recent technologies.
404 views DOI Abstract
2019
Treadmill running using an RPE-clamp model: mediators of perception and implications for exercise prescription.
Vol. 119 , No. 9 , pp. 2083-2094
344 views DOI Abstract
2019
Is the joint-angle specificity of isometric resistance training real? And if so, does it have a neural basis?
375 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
50.0/100 · Below Average
Ranked #75 of 29,298 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

50.0/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

80.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

9.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

80.3/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.