Indexed in Journament

PLoS computational biology

ISSN 1553-734X· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
40.5/100
Journament Score
#8,815
Journament Rank
137
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name PLoS Comput Biol
Abbreviated Name plos computational biology
ISSN 1553-734X
URL http://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol

Indexings

scopus ncbi doaj ulakbim sci

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (137)

2018
Differential tissue growth and cell adhesion alone drive early tooth morphogenesis: An ex vivo and in silico study.
Vol. 14 , No. 2 , pp. e1005981
562 views DOI Abstract
2019
ProtFus: A Comprehensive Method Characterizing Protein-Protein Interactions of Fusion Proteins.
Vol. 15 , No. 8 , pp. e1007239
528 views DOI Abstract
2013
Steered molecular dynamics simulations of a type IV pilus probe initial stages of a force-induced conformational transition.
Vol. 9 , No. 4 , pp. e1003032-
501 views Abstract
2019
miRWoods: Enhanced precursor detection and stacked random forests for the sensitive detection of microRNAs.
Vol. 15 , No. 10 , pp. e1007309
498 views DOI Abstract
2014
Learning gene networks under SNP perturbations using eQTL datasets.
Vol. 10 , No. 2 , pp. e1003420
471 views DOI Abstract
2020
Notch signaling and taxis mechanims regulate early stage angiogenesis: A mathematical and computational model.
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. e1006919
449 views DOI Abstract
2012
Joint modelling of confounding factors and prominent genetic regulators provides increased accuracy in genetical genomics studies.
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. e1002330
441 views DOI Abstract
2015
A Large-Scale Assessment of Nucleic Acids Binding Site Prediction Programs.
Vol. 11 , No. 12 , pp. e1004639-
430 views Abstract
2019
Searching algorithm for Type IV effector proteins (S4TE) 2.0: Improved tools for Type IV effector prediction, analysis and comparison in proteobacteria.
Vol. 15 , No. 3 , pp. e1006847
428 views DOI Abstract
2021
Machine learning reveals mesenchymal breast carcinoma cell adaptation in response to matrix stiffness.
Vol. 17 , No. 7 , pp. e1009193
224 views DOI Abstract
2020
A mechanism for epithelial-mesenchymal heterogeneity in a population of cancer cells.
Vol. 16 , No. 2 , pp. e1007619
313 views DOI Abstract
2020
Notch signaling and taxis mechanims regulate early stage angiogenesis: A mathematical and computational model.
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. e1006919
449 views DOI Abstract
2020
Interpreting neural decoding models using grouped model reliance.
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. e1007148
343 views DOI Abstract
2019
Evolutionary multiplayer games on graphs with edge diversity.
Vol. 15 , No. 4 , pp. e1006947
217 views DOI Abstract
2019
Autistic traits influence the strategic diversity of information sampling: Insights from two-stage decision models.
Vol. 15 , No. 12 , pp. e1006964
211 views DOI Abstract
2019
miRWoods: Enhanced precursor detection and stacked random forests for the sensitive detection of microRNAs.
Vol. 15 , No. 10 , pp. e1007309
498 views DOI Abstract
2019
Multi-Cell ECM compaction is predictable via superposition of nonlinear cell dynamics linearized in augmented state space.
Vol. 15 , No. 9 , pp. e1006798
340 views DOI Abstract
2019
Perspective: Dimensions of the scientific method.
Vol. 15 , No. 9 , pp. e1007279
331 views DOI Abstract
41
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

40.5/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.