Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation | Journament

Journal Ranking

#5394 / 33,972
📉 Poor
Overall Score
40.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 day ago

Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name Qual Life Res
Abbreviated Name qual life res
ISSN 1573-2649
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (21 total)

2019
A validation study of the ICECAP-O in informal carers of people with dementia from eight European Countries.
Perry-Duxbury, Meg;van Exel, Job;Brouwer, Werner;Sköldunger, Anders;Gonçalves-Pereira, Manuel;Irving, Kate;Meyer, Gabriele;Selbæk, Geir;Woods, Bob;Zanetti, Orazio;Verhey, Frans;Wimo, Anders;Handels, Ron L H;, ;
405 views DOI Abstract
2019
Positive balance: a hierarchical perspective of positive mental health.
Sirgy, M Joseph;
Vol. 28 , No. 7 , pp. 1921-1930
394 views DOI Abstract
2019
How do psychological characteristics of family members affected by substance use influence quality of life?
Vederhus, John-Kåre;Kristensen, Øistein;Timko, Christine;
Vol. 28 , No. 8 , pp. 2161-2170
389 views DOI Abstract
2020
Quality of life in people with dementia living in nursing homes: validation of an eight-item version of the QUALIDEM for intensive longitudinal assessment.
Junge, Stefan;Gellert, Paul;O'Sullivan, Julie Lorraine;Möller, Sebastian;Voigt-Antons, Jan-Niklas;Kuhlmey, Adelheid;Nordheim, Johanna;
371 views DOI Abstract
2019
Socioeconomic status, social support, oral health beliefs, psychosocial factors, health behaviours and health-related quality of life in adolescents.
Gomes, Andressa Coelho;Rebelo, Maria Augusta Bessa;de Queiroz, Adriana Correa;de Queiroz Herkrath, Ana Paula Correa;Herkrath, Fernando José;Rebelo Vieira, Janete Maria;Pereira, Juliana Vianna;Vettore, Mario Vianna;
362 views DOI Abstract
2019
Resilience is strongly associated with health-related quality of life but does not buffer work-related stress in employed persons 1 year after acute myocardial infarction.
Kirchberger, Inge;Burkhardt, Katrin;Heier, Margit;Thilo, Christian;Meisinger, Christine;
360 views DOI Abstract
2020
Expressive writing intervention for posttraumatic stress disorder among Chinese American breast cancer survivors: the moderating role of social constraints.
Chu, Qiao;Wu, Ivan H C;Lu, Qian;
355 views DOI Abstract
2019
Personality types and subjective well-being among people living with HIV: a latent profile analysis.
Rzeszutek, Marcin;Gruszczyńska, Ewa;
343 views DOI Abstract
2019
'Diabetes is a gift from god' a qualitative study coping with diabetes distress by Indonesian outpatients.
Arifin, Bustanul;Probandari, Ari;Purba, Abdul Khairul Rizki;Perwitasari, Dyah Aryani;Schuiling-Veninga, Catharina C M;Atthobari, Jarir;Krabbe, Paul F M;Postma, Maarten J;
335 views DOI Abstract
2019
Difficulties in emotion regulation and quality of life in patients with acne.
Cengiz, Gül Ferda;Gürel, Gülhan;
327 views DOI Abstract
View All 21 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.