Pharmaceutical research | Journament

Journal Ranking

#4248 / 33,981
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 6 days ago

Pharmaceutical research

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name Pharm Res
Abbreviated Name pharm res
ISSN 1573-904X
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (13 total)

2020
Comparison of the Hepatotoxic Potential of Two Treatments for Autosomal-Dominant Polycystic Kidney DiseaseUsing Quantitative Systems Toxicology Modeling.
Woodhead, J L;Pellegrini, L;Shoda, L K M;Howell, B A;
Vol. 37 , No. 2 , pp. 24
412 views DOI Abstract
2020
Thermodynamic Unfolding and Aggregation Fingerprints of Monoclonal Antibodies Using Thermal Profiling.
Melien, Richard;Garidel, Patrick;Hinderberger, Dariush;Blech, Michaela;
Vol. 37 , No. 4 , pp. 78
388 views DOI Abstract
2019
Utilization of In Vitro, In Vivo and In Silico Tools to Evaluate the pH-Dependent Absorption of a BCS Class II Compound and Identify a pH-Effect Mitigating Strategy.
Gesenberg, Christoph;Mathias, Neil R;Xu, Yan;Crison, John;Savant, Ishani;Saari, Amy;Good, David J;Hemenway, Jeffrey N;Narang, Ajit S;Schartman, Richard R;Zheng, Naiyu;Buzescu, Adela;Patel, Jatin;
Vol. 36 , No. 12 , pp. 164
382 views DOI Abstract
2020
Preformulation Studies of a Stable PTEN-PDZ Lipopeptide Able to Cross an In Vitro Blood-Brain-Barrier Model as a Potential Therapy for Alzheimer's Disease.
Lalatsa, Aikaterini;Sun, Yujiao;Gamboa, Jose Ignacio;Knafo, Shira;
Vol. 37 , No. 10 , pp. 183
370 views DOI Abstract
2019
Glycine-Poly-L-Lactic Acid Copolymeric Nanoparticles for the Efficient Delivery of Bortezomib.
Rajoria, Sudhakar;Rani, Sarita;Chaudhari, Dasharath;Jain, Sanyog;Gupta, Umesh;
Vol. 36 , No. 11 , pp. 160
356 views DOI Abstract
2019
Sugar Modification Enhances Cytotoxic Activity of PAMAM-Doxorubicin Conjugate in Glucose-Deprived MCF-7 Cells - Possible Role of GLUT1 Transporter.
Sztandera, Krzysztof;Działak, Paula;Marcinkowska, Monika;Stańczyk, Maciej;Gorzkiewicz, Michał;Janaszewska, Anna;Klajnert-Maculewicz, Barbara;
Vol. 36 , No. 10 , pp. 140
344 views DOI Abstract
2019
Anti-GPC3 Antibody Tagged Cationic Switchable Lipid-Based Nanoparticles for the Co-Delivery of Anti-miRNA27a And Sorafenib in Liver Cancers.
Wang, Zhengfeng;Zhao, Kun;Zhang, Yingxuan;Duan, Xinxin;Zhao, Yongfu;
Vol. 36 , No. 10 , pp. 145
343 views DOI Abstract
2018
Development of a Clinically Relevant Dissolution Method for Metaxalone Immediate Release Formulations Based on an IVIVC Model.
Vuletić, Lucija;Khan, M Zahirul I;Špoljarić, Drago;Radić, Maja;Cetina-Čižmek, Biserka;Filipović-Grčić, Jelena;
Vol. 35 , No. 8 , pp. 163
341 views DOI Abstract
2019
Efficacy of Surface-Modified PLGA Nanoparticles as a Function of Cervical Cancer Type.
Sims, Lee B;Curry, Keegan C;Parupalli, Sindhu;Horner, Gwynneth;Frieboes, Hermann B;Steinbach-Rankins, Jill M;
Vol. 36 , No. 5 , pp. 66
306 views DOI Abstract
2019
Polyelectrolyte Carboxymethyl Cellulose for Enhanced Delivery of Doxorubicin in MCF7 Breast Cancer Cells: Toxicological Evaluations in Mice Model.
Shafiei-Irannejad, Vahid;Rahimi, Mahdi;Zarei, Mojtaba;Dinparast-Isaleh, Roshan;Bahrambeigi, Saman;Alihemmati, Alireza;Shojaei, Salman;Ghasemi, Zarrin;Yousefi, Bahman;
Vol. 36 , No. 5 , pp. 68
303 views DOI Abstract
View All 13 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
30
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.8/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.