zhonghua fu chan ke za zhi | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1266 / 33,917
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 days ago

zhonghua fu chan ke za zhi

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name zhonghua fu chan ke za zhi
Abbreviated Name zhonghua fu chan ke za zhi
ISSN 0529-567X
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (21 total)

2020
[Preliminary study of PD-1 inhibitor in the treatment of drug-resistant recurrent gestational trophoblastic neoplasia]
Cheng HY;Yang JJ;Zhao J;Ren T;Feng FZ;Wan XR;Xiang Y;;
Vol. 55 , No. 6 , pp. -
446 views Abstract
2015
surgimiento de la escuela de obstetricia en el mapa social de costa rica: finales del siglo xix y principios del xx
;Daniel Martínez Esquivel;María de los Ángeles Meza Benavides
, No. 28 , pp. -
328 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Chromosomal abnormalities in spontaneous miscarriage specimens detected by combinatorial probe anchor synthesis-based high-throughput low coverage whole genome sequencing].
Wang, X H;Bai, R F;Zhou, Y;Dong, H;Ji, Y P;Hou, D X;Wu, R G M L;Yang, X L;Ji, X P;
Vol. 54 , No. 12 , pp. 808-814
325 views DOI Abstract
2014
[Relationship between letrozole administration during the luteal phase after oocyte retrieval and the early-stage ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome oocurrence].
He, Qiaohua;Xu, Jianing;Cui, Shihong;Li, Hangsheng;Zhang, Cuilian;
Vol. 49 , No. 12 , pp. 909-13
320 views Abstract
2019
[Expression and significance of MAPK/ERK in the specimens and cells of epithelial ovarian cancer].
Jiang, X L;Gao, J C;Jiang, L;Zhang, P X;Kang, T J;Sun, Q;Qi, W J;Zhang, Q P;Guan, H W;Shi, H;
Vol. 54 , No. 8 , pp. 541-547
291 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Analysis of recurrence and its influencing factors in patients with cervical HSIL within 24 months after LEEP].
Chen, L M;Liu, L;Tao, X;He, Y;Guo, L P;Zhang, H W;Zhou, X R;Sui, L;
Vol. 54 , No. 8 , pp. 534-540
279 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Success rate and influencing factors of external cephalic version for singleton pregnancies in the third trimester].
Long, J Q;Wei, H W;Xia, H W;Kong, L;Song, L;Yang, Q L;Qin, Y Q;
Vol. 54 , No. 8 , pp. 516-521
267 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Investigation on endometrium from menstrual blood as a source of non-invasive tissue].
Shu, S;Fan, Q B;Lang, J H;
Vol. 54 , No. 8 , pp. 527-533
245 views DOI Abstract
2014
analysis of the relevance of public policy for mental health care in costa rica1
;Daniel Martínez Esquivel
, No. 26 , pp. -
229 views DOI Abstract
2011
el aprendizaje basado en problemas para la intervención de la enfermería con la persona adulta mayor.
;Elena Mora Escalante
, No. 20 , pp. -
216 views DOI Abstract
View All 21 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.