Indexed in Journament

zhonghua fu chan ke za zhi

ISSN 0529-567X· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
28.5 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #24,288 of 29,324 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
21 Articles
Scores higher than 17.1% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Nombre Corto zhonghua fu chan ke za zhi
Nombre Abreviado zhonghua fu chan ke za zhi
ISSN 0529-567X

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.6
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 39.0
Community Impact 4.3
Content Distribution 59.7
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for zhonghua fu chan ke za zhi
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.4
Accessibility 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 25.8
Innovation 39.0 27.4
Community Impact 4.3 7.8
Content Distribution 59.7 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (21)

2020
[Preliminary study of PD-1 inhibitor in the treatment of drug-resistant recurrent gestational trophoblastic neoplasia]
Vol. 55 , No. 6 , pp. -
494 views Abstract
2019
[Chromosomal abnormalities in spontaneous miscarriage specimens detected by combinatorial probe anchor synthesis-based high-throughput low coverage whole genome sequencing].
Vol. 54 , No. 12 , pp. 808-814
385 views DOI Abstract
2015
surgimiento de la escuela de obstetricia en el mapa social de costa rica: finales del siglo xix y principios del xx
, No. 28 , pp. -
369 views DOI Abstract
2014
[Relationship between letrozole administration during the luteal phase after oocyte retrieval and the early-stage ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome oocurrence].
Vol. 49 , No. 12 , pp. 909-13
355 views Abstract
2019
[Expression and significance of MAPK/ERK in the specimens and cells of epithelial ovarian cancer].
Vol. 54 , No. 8 , pp. 541-547
335 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Analysis of recurrence and its influencing factors in patients with cervical HSIL within 24 months after LEEP].
Vol. 54 , No. 8 , pp. 534-540
326 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Success rate and influencing factors of external cephalic version for singleton pregnancies in the third trimester].
Vol. 54 , No. 8 , pp. 516-521
302 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Investigation on endometrium from menstrual blood as a source of non-invasive tissue].
Vol. 54 , No. 8 , pp. 527-533
280 views DOI Abstract
2014
analysis of the relevance of public policy for mental health care in costa rica1
, No. 26 , pp. -
258 views DOI Abstract
2020
[Preliminary study of PD-1 inhibitor in the treatment of drug-resistant recurrent gestational trophoblastic neoplasia]
Vol. 55 , No. 6 , pp. -
494 views Abstract
2019
[Chromosomal abnormalities in spontaneous miscarriage specimens detected by combinatorial probe anchor synthesis-based high-throughput low coverage whole genome sequencing].
Vol. 54 , No. 12 , pp. 808-814
385 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Success rate and influencing factors of external cephalic version for singleton pregnancies in the third trimester].
Vol. 54 , No. 8 , pp. 516-521
302 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Investigation on endometrium from menstrual blood as a source of non-invasive tissue].
Vol. 54 , No. 8 , pp. 527-533
280 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Analysis of recurrence and its influencing factors in patients with cervical HSIL within 24 months after LEEP].
Vol. 54 , No. 8 , pp. 534-540
326 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Expression and significance of MAPK/ERK in the specimens and cells of epithelial ovarian cancer].
Vol. 54 , No. 8 , pp. 541-547
335 views DOI Abstract
2015
the management of care: a social and legal function of chilean nursing
, No. 29 , pp. -
238 views DOI Abstract
2015
surgimiento de la escuela de obstetricia en el mapa social de costa rica: finales del siglo xix y principios del xx
, No. 28 , pp. -
369 views DOI Abstract
2015
experiencias de familias que conviven con una persona con diagnóstico de alzheimer
, No. 30 , pp. -
214 views DOI Abstract
2014
analysis of the relevance of public policy for mental health care in costa rica1
, No. 26 , pp. -
258 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
28.5/100 · Poor
Ranked #24,288 of 29,324 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

28.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

39.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

4.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

59.7/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.