Indexed in Journament

nuclear medicine and biology

ISSN 1872-9614· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
26.2 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #25,866 of 29,298 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
38 Articles
Scores higher than 11.7% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name nucl med biol
Abbreviated Name nucl med biol
ISSN 1872-9614
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/nuclear-medicine-and-biology

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.3
Accessibility 20.0
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 45.0
Community Impact 3.6
Content Distribution 50.1
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for nuclear medicine and biology
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.3 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 22.5
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 22.7
Innovation 45.0 24.1
Community Impact 3.6 4.2
Content Distribution 50.1 88.7
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (38)

2015
Automated radiosynthesis of GMP quality [18F]HX4 for PET imaging of hypoxia.
Vol. 42 , No. 5 , pp. 494-498
310 views DOI Abstract
1970
Rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2 using a radiolabeled antibody
Vol. 98-99 , pp. -
261 views Abstract
2017
primary clear cell microcystic adenoma of the sinonasal cavity: pathological or fortuitous association?
Vol. 2017 , pp. -
247 views DOI Abstract
2015
anaplastic transformation of papillary thyroid cancer in the retroperitoneum
Vol. 2015 , pp. -
233 views DOI Abstract
2011
odontogenic keratocyst looks can be deceptive, causing endodontic misdiagnosis
Vol. 2011 , pp. -
231 views DOI Abstract
2012
primary uterine cervix schwannoma: a case report and review of the literature
Vol. 2012 , pp. -
215 views DOI Abstract
2016
solitary fibrous tumor of the sigmoid colon masquerading as an adnexal neoplasm
Vol. 2016 , pp. -
212 views DOI Abstract
2015
tumor-to-tumor metastasis: lung carcinoma metastasizing to thyroid neoplasms
Vol. 2015 , pp. -
203 views DOI
2018
vaginal bleeding as initial presentation of an aggressive renal cell carcinoma: a case report and review of the literature
Vol. 2018 , pp. -
184 views DOI Abstract
2018
two surgical cases of combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma, intermediate-cell subtype: potentially characteristic gross features
Vol. 2018 , pp. -
126 views DOI Abstract
2017
glomangioma of the kidney: a rare case of glomus tumor and review of the literature
Vol. 2017 , pp. -
21 views DOI Abstract
2017
primary clear cell microcystic adenoma of the sinonasal cavity: pathological or fortuitous association?
Vol. 2017 , pp. -
247 views DOI Abstract
2016
postpartum granulomatous hypophysitis: a case study, review of the literature, and discussion of pathogenesis
Vol. 2016 , pp. -
50 views DOI Abstract
2016
solitary fibrous tumor of the sigmoid colon masquerading as an adnexal neoplasm
Vol. 2016 , pp. -
212 views DOI Abstract
2016
histiocytic sarcoma in a kidney transplant patient: a case report and review of the literature
Vol. 2016 , pp. -
117 views DOI Abstract
2016
a previously undescribed presentation of mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma
Vol. 2016 , pp. -
123 views DOI Abstract
2016
from the gut to the liver: another organ to watch in fap patients
Vol. 2016 , pp. -
88 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
26.2/100 · Poor
Ranked #25,866 of 29,298 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

26.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

45.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

3.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

50.1/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.