Indexed in Journament

Aging clinical and experimental research

ISSN 1720-8319· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
53.3 / 100
Journament Score
Average
Ranked #12 of 29,298 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
13 Articles
Scores higher than 99.9% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Aging Clin Exp Res
Abbreviated Name aging clin exp res
ISSN 1720-8319

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.7
Timeliness 60.0
Diversity 70.4
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 10.7
Content Distribution 73.3
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Aging clinical and experimental research
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.7 30.4
Accessibility 22.5
Timeliness 60.0 3.0
Diversity 70.4 22.7
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 10.7 4.2
Content Distribution 73.3 88.7
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (13)

2018
Temporal characteristics of imagined and actual walking in frail older adults - Aging Clinical and Experimental Research
Vol. 30 , No. 12 , pp. 1453-1457
467 views DOI Abstract
2020
European Collaborative and Interprofessional Capability Framework for Prevention and Management of Frailty-a consensus process supported by the Joint Action for Frailty Prevention (ADVANTAGE) and the European Geriatric Medicine Society (EuGMS).
457 views DOI Abstract
2020
Senior physical activity contests in nursing homes: a feasibility study.
436 views DOI Abstract
2016
The relative and absolute reliability of the Functional Independence and Difficulty Scale in community-dwelling frail elderly Japanese people using long-term care insurance services - Aging Clinical and Experimental Research
Vol. 29 , No. 3 , pp. 549-556
355 views DOI Abstract
2017
Elder abuse in Europe's "most elderly" city: an assessment of the phenomenon and an analysis of the data from the Penal Court of Genoa from 2010 to 2015.
Vol. 29 , No. 6 , pp. 1285-1290
338 views DOI Abstract
2019
Association of phase angle with sarcopenia and its components in physically active older women.
322 views DOI Abstract
2020
Neural substrate of a cognitive intervention program using Go game: a positron emission tomography study.
302 views DOI Abstract
2019
Osteoarticular infections: a specific program for older patients?
293 views DOI Abstract
2025
Impact of extreme weather events on food security among older people: a systematic review.
Vol. 37 , pp. 137
81 views DOI Abstract
2022
Attributes and definitions of locomotor capacity in older people: a World Health Organisation (WHO) locomotor capacity working group meeting report.
Vol. 34 , No. 3 , pp. 481-483
186 views DOI
2020
Senior physical activity contests in nursing homes: a feasibility study.
436 views DOI Abstract
2020
European Collaborative and Interprofessional Capability Framework for Prevention and Management of Frailty-a consensus process supported by the Joint Action for Frailty Prevention (ADVANTAGE) and the European Geriatric Medicine Society (EuGMS).
457 views DOI Abstract
2020
Neural substrate of a cognitive intervention program using Go game: a positron emission tomography study.
302 views DOI Abstract
2019
Osteoarticular infections: a specific program for older patients?
293 views DOI Abstract
2019
Association of phase angle with sarcopenia and its components in physically active older women.
322 views DOI Abstract
2018
Temporal characteristics of imagined and actual walking in frail older adults - Aging Clinical and Experimental Research
Vol. 30 , No. 12 , pp. 1453-1457
467 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
53.3/100 · Average
Ranked #12 of 29,298 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

53.3/100

Tier: Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

70.4/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

60.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

73.3/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.