Indexed in Journament

Aging clinical and experimental research

ISSN 1720-8319· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
38.9/100
Journament Score
#9,950
Journament Rank
13
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name Aging Clin Exp Res
Abbreviated Name aging clin exp res
ISSN 1720-8319

Indexings

scopus ncbi ulakbim

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (13)

2018
Temporal characteristics of imagined and actual walking in frail older adults - Aging Clinical and Experimental Research
Vol. 30 , No. 12 , pp. 1453-1457
448 views DOI Abstract
2020
European Collaborative and Interprofessional Capability Framework for Prevention and Management of Frailty-a consensus process supported by the Joint Action for Frailty Prevention (ADVANTAGE) and the European Geriatric Medicine Society (EuGMS).
434 views DOI Abstract
2020
Senior physical activity contests in nursing homes: a feasibility study.
416 views DOI Abstract
2016
The relative and absolute reliability of the Functional Independence and Difficulty Scale in community-dwelling frail elderly Japanese people using long-term care insurance services - Aging Clinical and Experimental Research
Vol. 29 , No. 3 , pp. 549-556
326 views DOI Abstract
2017
Elder abuse in Europe's "most elderly" city: an assessment of the phenomenon and an analysis of the data from the Penal Court of Genoa from 2010 to 2015.
Vol. 29 , No. 6 , pp. 1285-1290
317 views DOI Abstract
2019
Association of phase angle with sarcopenia and its components in physically active older women.
294 views DOI Abstract
2020
Neural substrate of a cognitive intervention program using Go game: a positron emission tomography study.
286 views DOI Abstract
2019
Osteoarticular infections: a specific program for older patients?
257 views DOI Abstract
2025
Impact of extreme weather events on food security among older people: a systematic review.
Vol. 37 , pp. 137
54 views DOI Abstract
2022
Attributes and definitions of locomotor capacity in older people: a World Health Organisation (WHO) locomotor capacity working group meeting report.
Vol. 34 , No. 3 , pp. 481-483
150 views DOI
2020
Senior physical activity contests in nursing homes: a feasibility study.
416 views DOI Abstract
2020
European Collaborative and Interprofessional Capability Framework for Prevention and Management of Frailty-a consensus process supported by the Joint Action for Frailty Prevention (ADVANTAGE) and the European Geriatric Medicine Society (EuGMS).
434 views DOI Abstract
2020
Neural substrate of a cognitive intervention program using Go game: a positron emission tomography study.
286 views DOI Abstract
2019
Osteoarticular infections: a specific program for older patients?
257 views DOI Abstract
2019
Association of phase angle with sarcopenia and its components in physically active older women.
294 views DOI Abstract
2018
Temporal characteristics of imagined and actual walking in frail older adults - Aging Clinical and Experimental Research
Vol. 30 , No. 12 , pp. 1453-1457
448 views DOI Abstract
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

38.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.