Indexed in Journament

mustansiriyah journal of science

ISSN 1814-635X· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
19.9 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #28,922 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
22 Articles
Scores higher than 1.3% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name mustansiriyah journal of science
Abbreviated Name mustansiriyah journal of science
ISSN 1814-635X
URL http://mjs.uomustansiriyah.edu.iq

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.7
Accessibility 20.0
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 10.5
Community Impact 5.0
Content Distribution 43.8
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.7 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 20.4
Timeliness 0.0 5.8
Diversity — 24.4
Innovation 10.5 25.7
Community Impact 5.0 5.8
Content Distribution 43.8 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (22)

2018
Facile Synthesis, Characterization of New Quinazolinones with Different Azo Compounds, 1,2,3-Triazole Moieties and Evaluation Their Anti-bacterial Activity.
Khan, Ayad Kareem;
Vol. 28 , No. 3 , pp. 122-133
401 views Abstract
2017
a survey of digital preservation challenges in nigerian libraries: librarians' perspectives
;Atanda Saliu Sambo;Enite Anita Urhefe;Stella Ejitagha
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. -
401 views DOI Abstract
2018
Biodegradation Effect of some Bacterial Isolates on some Endocrine Disruptors (EDCS)
Al-Hashimi, Amna mohmmed Ali;
Vol. 29 , No. 2 , pp. 43-49
396 views Abstract
2013
here, kaptur this! identifying and selecting the infrastructure required to support the curation and preservation of visual arts research data
;Leigh Garrett;Marie-Therese Gramstadt;Carlos Silva
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. 68-88
388 views DOI Abstract
2007
data curation standards and social science occupational information resources
;Paul Lambert;Vernon Gayle;Larry Tan;Ken Turner;Richard Sinnott;Ken Prandy
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 73-91
377 views DOI Abstract
2018
Fractal Image Compression Based on High Entropy Values Technique
Abbaas, Douaa Younis;
Vol. 28 , No. 2 , pp. 119-133
325 views Abstract
2009
one for many: a metadata concept for mixed digital content at a state archive
;Kai Naumann;Christian Keitel;Rolf Lang
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 80-92
273 views DOI Abstract
2013
informative provenance for repurposed data: a case study using clinical research data
;Richard Bache;Simon Miles;Bolaji Coker;Adel Taweel
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. 27-46
261 views DOI Abstract
2014
data management in metagenomics: a risk management approach
;Filipe Ferreira;Miguel E. Coimbra;Raquel Bairrão;Ricardo Viera;Ana T. Freitas;Luís M. S. Russo;José Borbinha
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 41-56
241 views DOI Abstract
2008
bringing self-assessment home: repository profiling and key lines of enquiry within drambora
;Andrew McHugh;Seamus Ross;Perla Innocenti;Ravio Ruusalepp;Hans Hofman
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 130-142
227 views DOI Abstract
2018
Fractal Image Compression Based on High Entropy Values Technique
Abbaas, Douaa Younis;
Vol. 28 , No. 2 , pp. 119-133
325 views Abstract
2018
Biodegradation Effect of some Bacterial Isolates on some Endocrine Disruptors (EDCS)
Al-Hashimi, Amna mohmmed Ali;
Vol. 29 , No. 2 , pp. 43-49
396 views Abstract
2018
Facile Synthesis, Characterization of New Quinazolinones with Different Azo Compounds, 1,2,3-Triazole Moieties and Evaluation Their Anti-bacterial Activity.
Khan, Ayad Kareem;
Vol. 28 , No. 3 , pp. 122-133
401 views Abstract
2017
a survey of digital preservation challenges in nigerian libraries: librarians' perspectives
;Atanda Saliu Sambo;Enite Anita Urhefe;Stella Ejitagha
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. -
401 views DOI Abstract
2015
what factors influence where researchers deposit their data? a survey of researchers submitting to data repositories
;Shea Swauger;Todd J. Vision
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 68-81
96 views DOI Abstract
2015
ten years back, five years forward: the data seal of approval
;Ingrid Dillo;Lisa de Leeuw
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 230-239
105 views DOI Abstract
2014
persistent identifiers for scholarly assets and the web: the need for an unambiguous mapping
;Herbert Van de Sompel;Robert Sanderson;Harihar Shankar;Martin Klein
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 331-342
43 views DOI Abstract
2014
the front office–back office model: supporting research data management in the netherlands
;Ingrid Dillo;Peter Doorn
Vol. 9 , No. 2 , pp. 39-46
189 views DOI Abstract
2014
data management in metagenomics: a risk management approach
;Filipe Ferreira;Miguel E. Coimbra;Raquel Bairrão;Ricardo Viera;Ana T. Freitas;Luís M. S. Russo;José Borbinha
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 41-56
241 views DOI Abstract
2014
creating an online television archive, 1987–2013
;Robert Browning
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 1-11
197 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
19.9/100 · Poor
Ranked #28,922 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

19.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

10.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

43.8/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.